Scheme Optimization of Freezing Technology for Borehole Stability of Gas Drilling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The gas drilling mainly relies on the high speed air flow to carry the cuttings. The formation water or oil mixed with the cuttings and then they stick together in clumps after the formation water or oil went into the hole annulus, the clumps stick on the drill string and the borehole. The clumps may block the hole annulus and cause the stick or bury the drill string and many other complex accident. It could stop the cuttings from sticking with the liquid through freezing the formation fluid with the liquid nitrogen. And the natural geotechnical becomes into the frozen soil, and forms the temporary solid which is intact, high strength and low-permeability. In this paper, according to the characteristic of the gas drilling technology, we optimized the scheme of freezing technology for borehole stability to give the theoretical basis of the industrial application.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

465-468

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Harris, J. S. Ground freezing in practice. London, Thomas. Telford Publishing, 1995, 155-164.

Google Scholar

[2] Wind, H. The soil freezing method for large tunnel construction. Engineering Geol., 1979, Vol. 13, 417-423.

Google Scholar

[3] Konrad, J. M., Seto, J. T. C. Frost heave characteristics of undisturbed sensitive Champlain Sea clay. Can. Geotech. J., 1994, Vol. 31, 285-298.

DOI: 10.1139/t94-033

Google Scholar

[4] Konrad, J. M., Morgenstern, N. R., A mechanistic theory of ice lens formation in fine-grain soils. Can. Geotech. J., 1980, Vol. 17, 473-486.

DOI: 10.1139/t80-056

Google Scholar

[5] Sanger, F. J. Ground Freezing in Construction. J. of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Proceedings of ASCE, 1968, Vol. 94, 131-158.

DOI: 10.1061/jsfeaq.0001080

Google Scholar