The Application of Identification of Fault by Well-Seismic Comprehensive Method - Taking Xingbei Oilfield as Example

Article Preview

Abstract:

For small faults have great influence on remaining oil distribution and injection-production relation in the latter period of high water-cut oilfield, an accurate distribution of these minor faults is one of the main control factors of injection-production adjustment. So, the little fault location predication accurately is necessary. But, research that only rely on logging data description of fault and reservoir characteristics have certain limitation, especially in the fault-points, crosswell faults combination and extension length, plane position and continuity between wells sand body, etc. The seismic forward modeling analysis, 3D visualization, various fault classification identification describe integration technology was used, and the fine structure interpretation method was formed, which integrated technology of the first big to small, first simple to complex, slice confirm fault strike, seismic section ensure fault dip, common fixed fault attitude. Fault The remaining potential of fault nearby, crosswell sand body and enlarge transitional are developed by reunderstanding reservoir which was studied in well-seismic interpretation technology. It’s important to improve the fine remaining oil descriptiont for further increaseing understanding of reservoir and of high water-cut old oilfields.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 962-965)

Pages:

494-499

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yan Liu, Xiao-hong Meng, Jin-min Hu, et al. Faults identifying technique and it's application in MB oil gas field [J]. Progress in geophysics, 2008, 23(2): 515~521. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Li-deng Gan, Xiao-feng Dai, Xin Zhang , et al. Key technologies for the seismic reservoir characterization of high water-cut oilfields [J]. Petroleum exploration and development, 2012, 39(3): 365 ~376. In Chinese.

DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(12)60056-1

Google Scholar

[3] Wei-sen Deng, Cheng-yan Lin. Seismic identification of low-level faults in PuI reservoir of Putaohua and Aobaota Oilfields [J]. Geophysical prospecting for petroleum, 2010, 49(1): 9 ~84. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Xin Zhang, Li-deng Gan, Wen-ling Liu , et al. Joint well-seismic interpretation of loe-grade faults in dense well pattern block [J]. Oil geophysical prospecting, 2012, 47(3): 462 ~468. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Rui-zhao Yang, Yuan-yuan Wang, Xing-yuan Wang , et al. Interpretation of small faults in coalfield 3D seismic survey: methods and application [J]. Mineral Engineering Res earch, 2010, 25(1): 12~15. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Hua-feng Tian, Wen-qiang Yang, Ming-wei Liu, et al. Application Layer sliced ​​forecast little coherence tomography [J]. Energy technology and management, 2010, (2): 83~84. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] Xi-wen Wang, Kong-qing Yang, Li-hong Zhou, et al. Methods of calculating coherence cube on the basis of wavelet transform [J]. Chinese journal of geophysics, 2002, 45(6): 847~85. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Xi-Ping Sun, Shi-tong Du. An application of power algorithm in the seismic attribute analysis [J]. Computing techniques for geophysical and geochemical exploration, 2000, 22(4): 316~32. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Wei-qi Song, Jiang-hua Liu. The calculation and application of coherence data body of seismic multi-vector attributes, 2003, 27(2): 128~130. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Duo-nian Xu, Chun-ling Jiang, Jian-guo Pan, et al. Application of Epos 3. 0 seismic interpretation system to volcanic reservoir exploration in Chepaizi area of Junggar Basin [J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2009, 21(1): 112~114. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Ke-yang Chen, Qing-ling Wu, Lai-lin Li, et al. Key technologies of 3D seismic data multi-survey joint processing and its application effect analysis in Songliao Basin [J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2012, 24(2): 87~88. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Bing Xia. Application of new seism ic technique in identification of low-grade fault [J]. Fault-block oil& gas field, 2007, 14(2): 24~26. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] Feng-lin Cui, Yun-qing Wang, Shu min Chen. The interpretation method and its effects for seismic data from the thin interbedded formations in the north of Songliao Basin [J]. Geophysical prospection for petroleum, 2001, 40(2) : 63~76. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[14] Yan Zhao, Zhen-hua He, De-ji Huang. Application of edge preserving smoothing to the calculation of seismic coherence cube [J]. Lithologic reservoirs , 2010, 22(2): 95~96. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] Yan-jun Wang, Xue-shan Yong, Ying-ru Liu et al. Research and application of small faults identification technology[J]. Progress in exploration geophysics, 2007, 30(2): 135- 139. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] Marfurt KJ, Sudhakar V, Gersztenkorn A et al. Cohereney caleulations in the presence of struetural dip [J]. Geophysies, 1999, 64(1): 104~111.

Google Scholar

[17] Li-juan Ma, Zhi-jun Jin. Accurate interpretation of complicated fault-block[J]. Oil geophysical prospecting, 2005, 40(6): 688-692. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[18] Yan-qing Zhang, Xiao-dong Wei, Ya-nan Wang et al. Application of spectral factorization in recognition and interpretation of minor faults in QL oilfield [J]. Oil geophysical prospecting, 2006, 41(5): 584~591. In Chinese.

Google Scholar