Thermal and Shear Characteristics Study of Various Mechanical Polishing Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Mechanical polishing is a primary technique for planarization of material surface in manufacture fabrication. Because the theoretical polishing mechanism is inadequately understood and because higher levels of polishing performance are desired, the investigation of experiment becomes more important. In this paper, a high precision polishing machine has established. With an improved design, a test rig can be easily used to simulate the mechanical polishing process and acquire the signals of polishing. The temperature-rise and shear force are measured for three different materials (i.e. copper, aluminum and silicon wafer) during mechanical polishing process. For the self-design test rig in the mechanical polishing process, its surface temperature is measured by T-type thermocouples screwed behind the polishing interface of the carrier. And shear force is measured by a load transducer mounted on the lever and connected with the polishing head. Furthermore, the roughness and particle size effects during polishing are demonstrated. The experimental results not only provide a good index to end-point-detection, but also increase the understanding of mechanical polishing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 97-101)

Pages:

2076-2079

Citation:

Online since:

March 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Taniguchi: Precis. Eng. Vol. 16 (1994), p.4.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Khan: Thin Solid Film Vol. 220 (1992), p.222.

Google Scholar

[3] L. M. Cook: Journal of Non-Crystal Solids Vol. 120 (1990), p.152.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Nanz and L. E. Camilletti: IEEE Trans. Semiconductor Manufacturing Vol. 8 (1995), p.382.

Google Scholar

[5] S. R. Runnels and L. M. Eyman: Journal of Electrochemical. Soc. Vol. 141 (1994), p.1698.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Sundararajan, D. G. Thakurta, D. W. Schwendeman, S. P. Murarka and W. N. Gill: J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 146 (1999), p.761.

Google Scholar

[7] H. J. Tsai, Y. R. Jeng and P. Y. Huang: Proc. IMechE Part J: J. Engineering Tribology Vol. 222 (2008), p.761.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Liang, F. Kaufman, R. Sevilla and S. Aniur: Wear (1997), p.271.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Lu, J. Coppeta, C. Rogers, L. Racz, A. Philipossian, M. Moinpour and F. Kaufman: Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 613 (2000), p. E1. 2. 1.

Google Scholar

[10] D. J. Stein and D. L. Hetherington, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4406 (2001), p.157.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Hocheng and Y. L. Huang, IEEE Trans. Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 17 (2004), p.180.

Google Scholar