Influence of Preparing of Specimen on Internal Stress Measurement of Aluminum Alloy Thick Plate

Abstract:

The cut, a main preparing means of specimen, will cause a difference in stress distribution between thick plate and the specimen, so this article focuses on the topic of evaluating impact of the cut on stress measurement results. Firstly, the real surface stress distribution of the plate and specimen were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and FEM. Secondly, according to the specimen dimension and machining procedure, the influence of the cut on internal stress measurement is obtained and compared with the FEM results. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the normal stress of cut plane steeply decreases and the stress gradient descends along with distance away from the cut. The range of distance is approximately one-thickness of specimen. (2) In order to obtain stable and reliable results, the plane size of specimen is taken three times larger than the thickness. (3) The milling processing of layer removal method (LRM) can change the surface stress state of specimen, but the machining effects on residual stresses can be removed by properly choosing milling parameters.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 97-101)
• Pages: 2658-2663
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.2658
• Online since: March 2010
• Authors: Kai Liao, Yun Xin Wu, Hai Gong
• Keywords: Finite Element Model (FEM), Machining Stress, Specimen, Thick Plates

References

[1] J. Matejicek , S. Sampath: Acta Mater. 49(2001), p. (1993).

[2] M.G. Bateman, O.H. Miller, T.J. Palmer, C.E.P. Breen, E.J. Kingston, D.J. Smith, M.J. Pavier: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 47(2005), p.1718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.011

[3] Sebastian Nervi, Barna A. Szabό: Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196(2007), p.3577.

[4] Gary S. Schajer, Michael B. Prime: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 7 (2006), p.375.

[5] S. Pratihar, V. Stelmukh, M.T. Hutchings, M.E. Fitzpatrick, U. Stuhr, L. Edwards: Materials Science and Engineering A. 437(2006), p.46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.061

[6] Michael B Prime, Thomas Gnäupel-Herold, John A. Baumann, Richard J. Lederich, David M. Bowden, ROBERT J. SEBRING: Acta Materialia. 54 (2006), p.4013.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.034

[7] Michael B Prime, Michael R Hill: Scripta Materialia. 46(2002), p.77.

[8] Muammer Koc, John Culp, Taylan Altan: Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 174(2006), p.342.

[9] Virkar, A. V: Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 73 (1990), p.2100.

[10] M. B. Prime，Michael R. Hill: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology. 11(2006), P. 175.

[11] E. Bendeka, I. Liraa, M. Franc-oisb, C. Vial: International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 48(2006), p.1429.

[12] Jaroslav Mackerle: Computational Materials Science. 27(2003), p.313.

[13] Shao-qiu Hu, Hui Zhang, Li-bin Yang, Gao-yong Lin, Ying Zhang: Natural Science Journal of Xiangtan University. 6(2004), p.66 (In Chinese).

[14] Gu Jian-feng, Pan Jian-sheng, Hu Ming-jua: Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University. 32(1998), p.19 (In Chinese).

[15] L. Li, J. Zhou, J. Duszczyk: Materials Processing Technology. 145(2004), p.360.

[16] Kai Liao, Yun-xin Wu, Yuan-yuan Zhang: Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment. 30(2009), p.192 (In Chinese).

[17] Fei Jia, jun-ze Jin: The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Meta. 11(2001), p.39 (In Chinese).

[18] Hu Shao-qiu, Zeng Su-min: Rare Metal Materials and Engineering. 35(2006), p.538 (In Chinese).

[19] Kai Liao, Wu, Gong Hai, Shu-yuan Zhang: The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Meta. 19(2009), p.1006 (In Chinese).

[20] Virkar, A. V: Journal of t Yun-xin he American Ceramic Society. 73(1990), p.2100.

[21] Kuang-hua Fuh, Chih-fu Wu: Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 51(1995), p.87.