Analysis on the Consumer Decision Time of Online Shopping

Article Preview

Abstract:

In prior literature of consumer decision time has received scholars’ attention. Many researches have examined the elements which can affect the time of consumer decision.With the rate growing in online shopping, how long a consumer will pay for the goods has been concerned by companies.Factors impact on the consumer decision time has attracted scholars’ attention. For these reasons, clearing factors which influence the decision time is very necessary.Consumers engaged in a choice process can focus on information they bring with them from prior search or experience, or information variable in the choice situation itself. One seemingly obvious hypothesis might be that the relative degree of usage of “prior” information would increase directly with the level of prior knowledge and experience. Use of prior knowledge might also vary over the phase of the choice process. Prior information could be very useful in narrowing the scope of the choice task early in the process by allowing the consumer to decide quickly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 971-973)

Pages:

2289-2292

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Greenleaf E A, Lehmann D R. Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1995: 186-199.

DOI: 10.1086/209444

Google Scholar

[2] Park, C. Whan and V. Parker Lessig (1981), Familiarity and Its Impact on Decision Biases and Heuristics, Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (September), 223-230.

DOI: 10.1086/208859

Google Scholar

[3] Zaichkowsky J L. Familiarity: product use, involvement or expertise[J]. Advances in consumer research, 1985, 12(1): 296-299.

Google Scholar

[4] Kim D J, Ferrin D L, Rao H R. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents[J]. Decision support systems, 2008, 44(2): 544-564.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001

Google Scholar

[5] A. Bhatnagar, S. Misra, H.R. Rao, On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior, Communications of the ACM 43 (11) (2000) 98–114.

DOI: 10.1145/353360.353371

Google Scholar

[6] E.H. Fram, D.B. Grady, Internet shoppers: is there a surfer gender gap? Direct Marketing 59 (9) (1997) 46–50.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Jacoby, L. Kaplan, The components of perceived risk, Advances in Consumer Research 3 (1972) 382–383.

Google Scholar

[8] Anderson E T, Hansen K, Simester D. The option value of returns: Theory and empirical evidence[J]. Marketing Science, 2009, 28(3): 405-423.

DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0430

Google Scholar

[9] Rao A R, Monroe K B. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers' perceptions of product quality: an integrative review[J]. Journal of marketing Research, 1989: 351-357.

DOI: 10.1177/002224378902600309

Google Scholar

[10] Spence H E, Engel J F, Blackwell R D. Perceived risk in mail-order and retail store buying[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1970: 364-369.

DOI: 10.1177/002224377000700313

Google Scholar

[11] Keeney R L. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs[M]. Cambridge University Press, (1993).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139174084.001

Google Scholar

[12] Friedman M, Savage L J. The utility analysis of choices involving risk[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1948, 56(4): 279-304.

DOI: 10.1086/256692

Google Scholar

[13] Arrow K J. Essays in the theory of risk-bearing[M]. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, (1971).

Google Scholar

[14] Che Y K. Customer return policies for experience goods [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1996: 17-24.

Google Scholar

[15] Inman J J, Dyer J S, Jia J. A generalized utility model of disappointment and regret effects on post-choice valuation [J]. Marketing Science, 1997, 16(2): 97-111.

DOI: 10.1287/mksc.16.2.97

Google Scholar

[16] S. Antony, Z. Lin, B. Xu, Determinants of escrow service adoption in consumer-to-consumer online auction market: an experimental study, Decision Support Systems 42 (3) (2006) 1889–(1900).

DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.012

Google Scholar

[17] Kim D J, Ferrin D L, Rao H R. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents[J]. Decision support systems, 2008, 44(2): 544-564.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001

Google Scholar

[18] Limayem, Moez, Mohamed Khalifa, and AnissaFrini. What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping., Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on 30. 4 (2000): 421-432.

DOI: 10.1109/3468.852436

Google Scholar

[19] Pires, Guilherme, John Stanton, and Andrew Eckford. Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online., Journal of Consumer Behaviour 4. 2 (2004): 118-131.

DOI: 10.1002/cb.163

Google Scholar

[20] Shaw W D. Searching for the Opportunity Cost of an Individual's Time[J]. Land Economics, 1992: 107-115.

Google Scholar