Effect of Epoxide Group in Thermoplastic Elastomer on the Properties of Polyamide6 and Low-Density Polyethylene Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

Studies on the effect of percentages of epoxide group in thermoplastic elastomer as a compatibilizer on properties of polyamide6 (PA6) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) blends was successfully carried out in this study. Thermoplastic epoxidized natural rubber (TPENR), made from epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) and LDPE, prepared from 3 types of ENR, i.e., ENR-20, ENR-50 and ENR-70, with the ratio of 90/10 of LDPE/ENR by weight. TPENR was applied as a compatibilizer into the blend of PA6/LDPE/TPENR at the ratio by weight of 80/20/1 by using a twin screw extruder at 235°C. All test specimens were characterized for phase morphology, impact strength and rheological behaviour. Results exhibited that phase morphology of PA6/LDPE blend was incompatible. The addition of TPENR improved the compatibility of PA6/LDPE blends. With inclusion of TPENR-20 as a compatibilizer, the uniformity and the maximum reduction of dispersed phase sized were observed. Moreover, it was revealed that the rheological properties such as shear viscosity increased when compared with PA6/LDPE incompatible blend. In addition, it was found that the highest shear viscosity and also the highest impact strength were obtained for the blend of PA6/LDPE compatibilized by TPENR-20. This result was further supported by SEM images, which showed that the smallest dispersed phase size occurred when a TPENR-20 was used as a compatibilizer. So, it was clearly demonstrated in this study that the suitable type of TPENR, i.e., TPENR-20, has an effect on improving phase morphology and properties of PA6/LDPE blends.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

143-146

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Gadekar, A. Kulkarni, J.P. Jog, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 69 (1998) 161-168.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Leewajanakul, R. Pattanaolarn, J.W. Ellis, M. Nithitanakul, B.P. Grady, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 89 (2003) 620-629.

DOI: 10.1002/app.11898

Google Scholar

[3] W.J. Macknight, R.W. Lenz, P.V. Musto, R.J. Somani, Polym. Eng. Sci. 25(18) (1985) 1124-1134.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Armat, A. Moet, Polymer 34(5) (1993) 977-985.

Google Scholar

[5] R.A. Kudva, H. Keskkula, D.R. Paul, Polymer 40 (1999) 6003-6021.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Halldén, M.J. Deriss, B. Wesslén, Polymer 42 (2001) 8743-8751.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(01)00452-9

Google Scholar

[7] L. Lamas, G.A. Mendez, A.J. Muller, M. Pracella, Eur. Polym. J. 34 (1998) 1865-1870.

Google Scholar

[8] L. Minkova, Hr. Yordanov, S. Filippi, Polymer 43 (2002) 6195-6204.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Psarski, M. Pracella, A. Galeski, Polymer 41 (2000) 4923-4932.

DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(99)00720-x

Google Scholar

[10] A. Valenza, A.M. Visco, D. Acierno, Polym. Test. 21 (2002) 101-109.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Raval, S. Devi, Y.P. Singh, M.H. Mehta, Polymer 32 (1991) 493-500.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Lahor, M. Nithitanakul, B.P. Grady, Eur. Polym. J. 40 (2004) 2409-2420.

Google Scholar

[13] P.L. Teh, Z.A. Mohd Ishak, A.S. Hashim, J. Karger-Kocsis, U.S. Ishiaku, Eur. Polym. J. 40 (2004) 2513-2521.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.06.025

Google Scholar

[14] V. Tanrattanakul, N. Sungthong, P. Raksa, Polym. Test. 27 (2008) 794-800.

Google Scholar