Effect of Austenizing and Tempering Time on Corrosion Rate of Austenitic Stainless Steel in Oxalic Acid

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this work is to study the effect of austenizing time, tempering process and tempering time on corrosion rate of austenitic stainless steel in oxalic acid. The samples of typical 304 stainless steel were heated to 1050°C for 10, 20 and 30 minutes and quenched to room temperature in water, then tempered at 250°C, 400°C and 600°C for 30, 60 minutes for each tempering time. These samples were then immersed in 0.1M of oxalic acid and then their weight losses were measured after 30 days. The result obtained show that corrosion rate of all austenitic stainless steel samples decreased with an increase austenizing time, this behaviour is due to more homogenously of austenite, and the corrosion rate will be increased with increase the tempering temperature and tempering time, this behaviour is due different phases at microstructure below 400°C, and above of 400 to 600°C the corrosion rate will be increased due to formation of carbides which are non-uniform distributed at the grain boundaries and causes intergranular corrosion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

46-51

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] William F. Smith, Foundations of materials science and engineering, McGraw-Hill, Third edition, 1990, pp.494-497.

Google Scholar

[2] Raymond A. Higgins, Material for the engineering technician, The English university press ltd, First published 1972, p.161.

Google Scholar

[3] J. L, Pandey, S. Inder and, M. N. Singh. Electrochemical corrosion behaviour of heat treated AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel in inorganic acid mixture. Anti –Corrosion Methods and Materials 1997, Vol. 44, No1, p.6.

DOI: 10.1108/00035599710157413

Google Scholar

[4] M. Matula, L. Hyspecka, M. Svoboda, V. Vodarek, C. Dagbert, J. Galland, Z. Stonawska, and L. Tuma. Intergranular corrosion of AISI 316L steel. Materials Characterization 2001, Vol. 46, p.203 – 210.

DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(01)00125-5

Google Scholar

[5] Aydogdu, G. H. and Aydinol, M. K. (2006) Determination of susceptibility to intergranular corrosion and electrochemical reactivation behaviour of AISI 316L type stainless steel. Corrosion Science Vol. 48, p.3565 – 3583.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.01.003

Google Scholar

[6] L.W., Tsay, S.C., Yu, S. D. Chyou and D.Y. Lin. A comparison of hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of two austenitic stainless steel welds. Corrosion Science 2007, Vol. 49, p.4028 – 4039.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.04.005

Google Scholar

[7] M. Matula, C. Dagbert, L. Hyspecka, J. Galland and I. Martinakova. Detection of sensitization to intergranular corrosion in AISI 316Lstainless steel: electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation tests. ProcInt Conf Euro–corr, 2000, London.

DOI: 10.1016/s1044-5803(01)00125-5

Google Scholar

[8] I. Betova, M. Bojinov, P. Kinnunen, P. Pohjanne and T. Saario Influence of the electrolyte composition and temperature on the transpassive dissolution of austenitic stainless steels in simulated bleaching solutions. ElectrochimicaActa2002 Vol. 47, p.3335.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(02)00271-2

Google Scholar

[9] A. Galal, N. F. Atta and M. H. S. Al–Hassan. Effect of some thiophenederivatives on the electrochemical behaviour of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel in acidic solutions containing chloride ions. I Molecularstructure and inhibition efficiency relationship. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2005, Vol. 89, p.38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.08.019

Google Scholar

[10] S. Girija, U. Kamachi Mudali, H.S. Khatak and B. Raj. The application of electrochemical noise resistance to evaluate the corrosion resistance of AISI type 304 SS in nitric acid. Corrosion Science 2007, Vol. 49, p.4051– 4068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.04.007

Google Scholar

[11] S. Frangini and S. Loreti. The role of alkaline-earth additives on the molten carbonate corrosion of 316L stainless steel. Corrosion Science2007, Vol. 49, p.3969 – 3987.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.05.005

Google Scholar

[12] A. Rajan Heat treatment principles and techniques. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi. 1998, pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM A 262 – 90. Standard practices for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 1990: Section 3. Metals test methods and analytical procedures: Vol. 03. 02. Wear and erosion. Metal corrosion. Philadelpia, PA: ASTM, (1992).

DOI: 10.1520/a0262-02ar08

Google Scholar

[14] K. P. Balan, , A. Venugopal Reddy and D. S. Sarma. Austenite precipitation during tempering in 16Cr – 2Ni martensitic stainless steels. ScriptaMaterialia1998, Vol. 39, No 7, p.901 – 905.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(98)00267-x

Google Scholar

[15] L. C. Lim, M. O. Lai, and J. Ma, Tempering of AISI 403 stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering 1993, Vol. A171, p.13 – 19.

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(93)90388-u

Google Scholar

[16] B. Qin, Z. Y. Wang, and Q. S. Sun. Effect of tempering temperature on properties of 00Cr16Ni5Mo Stainless steel. Materials Characterization. 2007, Article in press.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.08.025

Google Scholar

[17] Husain Baker, Corrosion engineering and metal surface protection, Baghdad, 1989, p.81.

Google Scholar

[18] G.O. Ilevbare, and G.T. Burstein. The role of alloyed molybdenum in the inhibition of pitting corrosion in stainless steels. Corrosion Science2001, Vol. 43, pp.485-513.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-938x(00)00086-x

Google Scholar