Summary of Study on Error Evaluation Indices of Power System Simulation Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The integrity, objectivity and science of the evaluation index system will be directly related to the accuracy of the evaluation results. However, studies on the quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of the simulation model are not still perfect, comprehensive, and links between relevant literatures are not close enough. The main thing is the lack of systematic summary of the theoretical literatures. Therefore, this paper is summarized in three aspects, the research results, indices classification and their respective advantages and disadvantages, the applicable range of indicators.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)

Pages:

572-576

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Renmu He. Research into veracity of power system dynamic simulation[J]. Power System Technology, 2000, 24(12): 1-4(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Cheng Zhou and Renmu He. Assessment on simulation a accuracy of power system component models[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(14): 12-15(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Huang Z Y, Kosterev M and Guttromson R. Model validation with hybrid dynamic simulation[C]. Proceedings of IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting 2006, Montreal, Canada, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2006.1709399

Google Scholar

[4] Huang Z, Guttromson R and Hauer J. Large-scale hybrid dynamic simulation employing field measurements[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004, Denver, USA, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2004.1373135

Google Scholar

[5] Pereira L, Undrill J and Kosterev D. A new thermal governor modeling approach in the WECC[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2): 819-829.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.811007

Google Scholar

[6] Patterson S, Kosterev D, Davies D. New thermal governor model selection and validation in the WECC[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1): 517-523.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.818701

Google Scholar

[7] Kosterev D. Hydro turbine-governor model validation in pacific northwest power systems[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 2004, 19(2): 1144-1149.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.821464

Google Scholar

[8] Kosterev D N, Tylor C W, et al. Model validation for the august10, 1996 WSCC system outage[J]. IEEE Trans on Power Sys-tems, 1999, 14(3).

DOI: 10.1109/59.780909

Google Scholar

[9] Jin Ma, Wenjin Sheng, Renmu He. A simulation validation strategy based on wide area measurement[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2007, 31(18): 11-16(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Bo Bo, Ma Jin. A hybrid dynamic simulation validation strategy based on time-varied impedance[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2009, 33(6): 6-10(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Song Gao, Renmu He, Jin Ma. Error Criteriaon Power System Dynamie Simulation Validation [J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2006, 30(4):6-10.

Google Scholar

[12] Cheng Zhou, Renmu He, Jili Wang. Dynamic Evaluation of Effectiveness of Power System Simulation Models[J]. Power System Technology, 2009, 33(14):12-15.

Google Scholar

[13] Han Dong, Ma Jin, He Renmu, et al.Uncertainty analysis in dynamic characteristics of load model based on probabilistic collocation method[J] . Proceedings of the CSEE , 2008 , 28(19) : 71-76(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Wu Di, Xin Huanhai, Gan Deqiang.Evaluation on impact ofparameter uncertainty in power system dynamic simulation[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2008, 32(5):15-19(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Zhu Fang, Tang Yong, Zhang Dongxia, et al.Influence of excitation and governor model parameters on simulation of large-disturbance test in Northeast China power grid[J].Power System Technology, 2007, 31(4):69-74(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] Shikao Liu, Xingtang Liu, Wen Zhang. Fixed Quantity Evaluation to Reliability of Simulation System with Similar Degree[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2002, 14(2):143-145.

Google Scholar

[17] Cheng Zhou, Renmu He. Accuracy Assessment of Power System Dynamic Simulation Based on Landmark Method[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2010, 30(7):42-47.

Google Scholar

[18] Jin Zhang. Research on Validation of Power System Dynamic Simulation[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, (2005).

Google Scholar

[19] Hongjun Li. Researches on Power System Dynamic Simulation Error[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, (2005).

Google Scholar

[20] Jiang He. Research on Validity Evaluation and Paramter Calibration of Generator Model Based on Hybrid Dynamic Simulation[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, (2011).

Google Scholar

[21] Zhaoqiang Wu. Research on Power System Dynamic Simulation Error Criteria[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, (2008).

Google Scholar