A Fusion Method of Point-Cloud Based on Parallel Estimation of Distribution Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper proposes a new method that utilizes Parallel Estimation of Distribution (PED) to obtain disparity map of two images and fuses 3D point-cloud by the disparity. Estimation of Distribution (ED) has several advantages such as low complexity and high efficiency while it also has the shortcoming that it’s sensitive to initial samples and the final solution is local optimum but global optimum. In order to exert its merit and overcome the shortcoming, this paper will improve the ED by parallel sampling to diminish the sensitivity with Adaptive Support-Weight method. We called it Parallel Estimation of Distribution (PED). After disparity map is obtained, the two images will be divided into high frequency and low frequency by lifting wavelet respectively and the frequency coefficient of each image will be averaged into fusion frequency. Finally, the fused frequency coefficient will be transformed by inverse lifting wavelet to the final fused image. The experiment has proved that the matching speed is outstanding without losing precision.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 989-994)

Pages:

1555-1560

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Liu Tianliang, Luo Limin. Segmentation –Based Stereo Matching Algorithm with Variable Support and Disparity Estimation. ACTA OPTICA SINICA, vol. 29, No. 4: (2009).

DOI: 10.3788/aos20092904.1002

Google Scholar

[2] Wu Chun-Hong, Fu Guo-Liang. A Stereo Matching Based on K-means Segmentation and Neighborhood Constraints Relaxation. Chinese Journal of Computers, vol. 34, No. 4, (2011).

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1016.2011.00755

Google Scholar

[3] L. De-Maeztu, A. Villanueva, and R. Cabeza. Stereo matching using gradient similarity and locally adaptive support-weight. Pattern Recognition Letters. vol. 32, No. 13, pp.1643-1651, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.06.027

Google Scholar

[4] Q. Yang, L. Wang, and N. Ahuja. A constant-space belief propagation algorithm for stereo matching. CVPR, (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] C. Cassisa. Local vs global energy minimization methods: Application To Stereo Matching. PIC, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/pic.2010.5687902

Google Scholar

[6] F. Besse, C. Rother, A. Fitzgibbon, and J. Kautz. PMBP: PatchMatch belief propagation for correspondence field estimation. BMVC, (2012).

DOI: 10.5244/c.26.132

Google Scholar

[7] N. Barzigar, A. Roozgard, S. Cheng, and P. Verma. SCoBeP: Dense image registration using sparse coding and belief propagation. JVIS, (2012).

DOI: 10.5430/ijdi.v2n1p54

Google Scholar

[8] C. Pham and J. Jeon. Domain transformation-based efficient cost aggregation for local stereo matching. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2012.2223794

Google Scholar

[9] X. Mei, X. Sun, W. Dong, H. Wang, and X. Zhang. Segment-tree based cost aggregation for stereo matching. CVPR, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.47

Google Scholar

[10] Kuk-Jin Yoon. Adaptive Support-Weight Approach for Correspondence Search. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 4, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2006.70

Google Scholar

[11] Zhou Xiu-Zhi, Wen Gong-jian, Wang Run-Sheng. Fast Stereo Matching Using Adaptive Window. Chinese Journal of Computers. vol. 29, No. 3, (2006).

Google Scholar

[12] Guo X, Wang L, Zeng J, Zhang X. VQ Codebook Design Algorithm Based on Copula Estimation of Distribution Algorithm. 2011 First International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing, pp.21-23, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/rvsp.2011.35

Google Scholar

[13] Salinas-Gutiérrez R, Hernández-Aguirre A, et al. D-vine EDA: a New Estimation of Distribution Algorithm Based on Regular Vines. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp.359-365, (2010).

DOI: 10.1145/1830483.1830550

Google Scholar

[14] Zhou Shu-De, Sun Zeng-Qi. A Survey on Estimation of Distribution Algorithms. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA. vol. 33, No. 2, (2007).

Google Scholar

[15] Neslehova J. On Rank Correlation Measures for Non-continuous Random Variables. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, No. 98, pp.544-567, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2005.11.007

Google Scholar

[16] Kolesarova A, Mordelova J. Quasi-copulas and copulas on a discrete scale. Soft Computing, No. 10, pp.459-501, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/s00500-005-0524-6

Google Scholar

[17] Cai Dun-Hu, Yi Xu-Ming. The Selection of Wavelet Basis in Image Denoising. Journal of MatheMatics, vol. 25, No. 2, (2005).

Google Scholar

[18] Deng, Na, and Chang-sen Jiang. Selection of optimal wavelet basis for signal denoising. Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2012 9th International Conference on IEEE, (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2012.6234211

Google Scholar