The Application of Correlation Dimension in the Multi-Objective Comprehensive Evaluation of the Large Complex Equipment Procurement Scheme

Article Preview

Abstract:

The multi-objectives of procurement scheme evaluation and the complicated nonlinear are pointed out in this paper according to the definition and characteristics of large complex equipments, and with regard to the defects present in the existing multi-objective comprehensive evaluation method, the assessment method of using fractal correlation dimension as the comprehensive quantitative index of multi-objective decision making in the large complex equipment procurement scheme is put forward, and the efficiency of such method is verified by the example of combat aircraft, which provides a new idea for the multiple objective decision making in the large complex equipment procurement scheme.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 989-994)

Pages:

2507-2510

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hobday, M. Product Complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Research Policy, 1998, 26: 689-710.

DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00044-9

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Qishan. Difference information entropy in grey theory[J]. The Journal of Grey System(UK), 2001, 13(2): 111)116.

Google Scholar

[3] Guo Yajun. A new dynamic comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2002, 5(2): 49-54.

Google Scholar

[4] XlU Guo-yi, CHEN Xiao-hua. Selection and evaluation of TPL based on information entropy[J]. China Management Science, 2011, 19(10): 459-463.

Google Scholar

[5] Lin Yuanqing. A correction of the peers appraisal—The off_set method and its applications[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 1998, 16(4): 69-75.

Google Scholar

[6] Dimitras A I , Slowinski R , Susmaga R , et al. Business failure prediction using rough sets[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 95: 24-37.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00255-0

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Ji-zhong. Fractal[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1995: 1-66.

Google Scholar

[8] HanYi, Tang Xiao-wo, Optimization of multi-index comprehensive evaluation method in some distribution[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 1999, (3): 55-58.

Google Scholar

[9] GuJifa. Methods of Comprehensive Evaluation[M]. Beijing: Science Technology Press of China, 1990. 22-26.

Google Scholar

[10] Huang Run-sheng. Chaos and its applications [M]. Wuhan: Wuhan university press, 2005: 183-190.

Google Scholar

[11] Li Jun, Song Bi-feng, Fei Yang. Project assessment of modern combat aircraft based on hierarchy systems[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(10): 1824-1834.

Google Scholar

[12] Zhang Heng-xi. Modern aircraft cost-effectiveness ratio analysis [M]. Beijing: Aviation industry press, 2001: 131-138.

Google Scholar