Modeling and Analysis of Surface Roughness with Statistical and Soft Computing Approach

Laxman B. Abhang; M. Hameedullah

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.106.109

Paper Titles

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Reverse Two-Step Sintering on Aluminium-Silicon Carbide Metal Matrix Composite
p.78

Manufacturing, Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of Stir Cast Aluminium 7075/SiC Metal Matrix Composite
p.84

Optimization of Process Parameters for Plasma Sprayed Lanthanum Zirconate TBCs on Nickel Based Superalloy
p.90

Simulation Modelling and Analysis of Due Date Assignment Methods and Scheduling Decision Rules in a Flexible Manufacturing System
p.99

Modeling and Analysis of Surface Roughness with Statistical and Soft Computing Approach
p.109

Experimental Investigation on a PCM Based Thermal Energy Storage System for a VCR System
p.116

Review on Energy Enhancement Techniques of Wind Turbine System
p.121

Damping Performance of Polychloroprene Rubber for Unconstrained Damping Applications
p.131

A Gaussian Process Based Model for Air-Jet Cooling of Mild Steel Plate in Run Out Table
p.137

HomeAdvances in Science and TechnologyAdvances in Science and Technology Vol. 106Modeling and Analysis of Surface Roughness with...

Modeling and Analysis of Surface Roughness with Statistical and Soft Computing Approach

Abstract:

The objective of this study focuses on developing empirical prediction models using response regression analysis and fuzzy-logic. These models latter can be used to predict surface roughness according to technological variables. The values of surface roughness produced by these models are compared with experimental results. Experimental investigation has been carried out by using scientific composite factorial design on precision lathe machine with tungsten carbide inserts. Surface roughness measured at end of each experimental trial (three times), to get the effect of machining conditions and tool geometry on the surface finish values. Research showed that soft computing fuzzy logic model developed produces smaller error and has satisfactory results as compared to response regression model during machining.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Material Science and Mechanical Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 106)

Pages:

109-115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.106.109

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2021

Authors:

Laxman B. Abhang*, M. Hameedullah

Keywords:

Composite Design, Fuzzy Model, Surface Smoothness

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Palanikumar K, Karunamoorthy L., karthikeyan R., and Latha B.Optimization of ma- chining parameters in turning GFRP composites using a carbide (k10) tool based on the Taguchi method with fuzzy logics, Metals and Materials International, 2006; 12 (6), 483-491.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03027748

Google Scholar

[2] Latha B, and Senthilkumar V S. Fuzzy rule based modelling of drilling parameters for de- limitation in drilling GFRP composites, Journal of Reinforced plastics and composites, 2009;.

DOI: 10.1177/0731684407087570

Google Scholar

[3] Wong S.V. and Hamouda A.M.S. A fuzzy logic based expert system for mach inability data-on-demand on the internet, Journals of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 2005; (124), 57-66.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00091-2

Google Scholar

[4] Suleyman Y. Faruk U. and Haci S.Comparisons of experimental results obtained by de- sign dynamometer to fuzzy model for predicting cutting forces in turning, Material and de- sign, vol. 2006; (27)1139-1147.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.010

Google Scholar

[5] Ozel T. Karpat Y.Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear inhard turning usingregression and neural networks, International Journal of Ma – chinetools and Manufacture2005; (45)467-479.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.007

Google Scholar

[6] Sivarao, Peter Brevern, N.S.M. EI- Tayeb, V.C. Venkatesh V. C. GUI based Mamdani fuzzy in-ference system modeling to predict surface roughness in Laser machining, Int. Journal of Electrical and Computer sciences 2008; (9) 281- 288.

Google Scholar

[7] Suresh P. V. S. Venkateswara Rao P., and Deshmukh S. G. A genetic algorithmicapproachfor optimization of surface roughness prediction model, International Journal of Machine tools and and Manufactures, 2002; (42) ,675-680.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00005-6

Google Scholar

[8] Abhang, L. B. and Hameedullah. M., Empirical modeling of turning parameters using grey relational analysis, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, Vol. 110-116, pp.2596-2603.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.110-116.2596

Google Scholar

[9] Mohd Iqbal, Muhammad Tadjuddin, Laxman B Abhang, Investigation of hole delamination in drillingkeblar composite panel using HSS drill tool, Defect and Diffusion Forum, 2020, Vol. 402, 108-114.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.402.108

Google Scholar

[10] Laxman B Abhang, Mohd Iqbal, M Hameedullah, Optimization of machining process parameters using moora method, Defect and Diffusion Forum, 2020, Volume 402, 81-89.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.402.81

Google Scholar

[11] Abhang L.B. and M Hameedullah M. Chip-tool interface temperature prediction model for turning process, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2010; 2 (4), 382-393.

Google Scholar

[12] Abhang L B and Hameedullah M. Power prediction model for Turning En-31 steel Using Response surface methodology, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 2010; 3 (1), 116-122.

DOI: 10.25103/jestr.031.20

Google Scholar

[13] Abhang L. B. and Hameedullah M. Determination of optimum parameters for multi-performan characteristics in turning by using grey relational analysis, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012,.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3857-6

Google Scholar