Damping Performance of Polychloroprene Rubber for Unconstrained Damping Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Damping properties are crucial in determining the dynamic structural response. In this paper, the experimental results for Neoprene rubber of 40, 50 and 60 shore A hardness are reported in view of improving structural damping to control noise and vibrations. Additionally, the system loss factors of the unconstrained layer damped structures of same material were predicted by Ross-Kerwin-Ungar equation to validate the obtained experimental results. The results showed that Neoprene rubber (also known as Polychloroprene) of 60 shore A showed better static and dynamic characteristics than those of the 40 and 50 shore A hardness. The system loss factor results reached the saturation when the applied viscoelastic layer thickness was increased from 40 mm to 50 mm in unconstrained damping. As such, the proposed method can help to build a database of the properties of various materials which are applicable in the design of noise and vibration control.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

131-136

Citation:

Online since:

May 2021

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2021 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Fahy, J. Walker, Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration, CRC Press, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] M.P. Norton, D.G. Karczub, Fundamentals of noise and vibration analysis for engineers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] A.D. Nashif, D.I.G. Jones, J.P. Henderson, Vibration Damping, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1985).

Google Scholar

[4] H. Oberst, K. Frankenfeld, On the damping of bending vibrations on thin sheet metal by firmly bonded coatings, Acustica. 2 (1952) 181–194.

Google Scholar

[5] E.M. Kerwin Jr, Damping of flexural waves by a constrained viscoelastic layer, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31 (1959) 952–962.

DOI: 10.1121/1.1907821

Google Scholar

[6] D.J. Mead, S. Markus, The forced vibration of a three-layer, damped sandwich beam with arbitrary boundary conditions, J. Sound Vib. 10 (1969) 163–175.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(69)90193-x

Google Scholar

[7] D. Rao, Frequency and loss factors of sandwich beams under various boundary conditions, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 20 (1978) 271–282.

DOI: 10.1243/jmes_jour_1978_020_047_02

Google Scholar

[8] B.C. Nakra, Vibration Control with Viscoelastic Materials,, Journal of the Shock & Vibration Digest, USA, 16, No. 5, p.13, (1984).

DOI: 10.1177/058310248401600505

Google Scholar

[9] VVS.BhaskaraRaju and T.Subrahmanyam, Development of EPDM Rubber Compound with White Filler for Constraint Layer Damping Technique,. International Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2012; 6(1): pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[10] H.Ismail, C.L.Ho,C.C. Lim, The Effects of A Multifunctional Additive on Curing Characteristics, Mechanical Properties, And Swelling Behavior of Natural Rubber/Polychloroprene Rubber Blends,. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2007; 40 (4): pp.505-517.

DOI: 10.1081/ppt-100002073

Google Scholar

[11] Prasanth Kumar M, Anivesh Reddy K, BhaskaraRaju VVS, N.Ramanaiah, Performance Study on Asymmetric FLD Using Rubber Coatings,. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Technology. 2016; 7(6): p.547–554.

Google Scholar

[12] Prasanth Kumar M, Mamatha B, BhaskaraRaju VVS,N.Ramanaiah,Effect of thickness on asymmetric Extensional Damping Treatment using Viscoelastic Materials,. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT).2017; 50(5): p.292–295.

DOI: 10.14445/22315381/ijett-v50p248

Google Scholar