Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Tuning PI Controller Based Speed Control of Switched Reluctance Motor for Ship Propulsion Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electric ship propulsion is no longer a revolutionary idea in the marine sector today. Lights were the first thing that needed electricity on board a ship, and it later applied to an electric ship propeller that is powered by an electric motor. Eventually, the idea of all-electric ships enters the picture, allowing all ship power sources to run both auxiliary and propulsion loads. Due to the great electric power constraints, numerous electric motors are used in industrial and naval ships, and the development of power electronics has made it easier to manage and regulate these motors. The switching resistance motor is becoming more popular despite its low dependability and straightforward design. Such benefits make SR motors superior to conventional adjustable speed devices. Due to their significant torque fluctuations, variable reluctance motors have recently been used in restriction traction systems. On the other side, torque ripple reduces motor performance by generating repeated noise and vibration. The suggested system controls the speed of an 8/6 pole SRM using a metaheuristic Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (GWO), Proportional Integral (PI) controller, and a (n+1) Semiconductor (n+1) Diode power conversion. This article's goal is to increase the proposed Switched Reluctance Motor's output cogging torque. GWO algorithm has been chosen as a promising strategy when compared to other algorithms because of its generality, decreased complexity, stability, and accuracy. MATLAB/Simulink was used to create the simulation tool.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

55-63

Citation:

Online since:

September 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rubaai A, Kotaru R, Online identification and control of a DC motor using learning adaptation of neural networks. Ind Appl IEEE Trans 36(3):935–942; (2000)

DOI: 10.1109/28.845075

Google Scholar

[2] Yedamale P, Brushless DC (BLDC) Motor fundamentals. Microchip Technology Inc. 20:3–15; (2008)

Google Scholar

[3] Shi Y, Eberhart RC, A modified particle swarm optimizer. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146; (2018)

DOI: 10.1109/icec.1998.699146

Google Scholar

[4] Dutta P, Mahato SN, Design of mathematical model and performance analysis of BLBLDC motor. IEEE Int Conf Control Instrum Energy Commun India. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEC.2014.6959130; (2020)

DOI: 10.1109/ciec.2014.6959130

Google Scholar

[5] Fogel DB, Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence. Press Series on Computational Intelligence IEEE, 3rd Edition: 128-138; (2016)

Google Scholar

[6] Ziegler G, Nichols NB, Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME 64:759–768; (1942)

DOI: 10.1115/1.4019269

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang L "Simplex method based optimal design of PID controller." Inform Control 33:376–379; (2004)

Google Scholar

[8] Thomas Neenu, Poongodi Dr P, Position control of DC motor using genetic algorithm based PID controller. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineerin; (2009)

Google Scholar

[9] Kim Dong Hwa, Jin Ill Park, Intelligent PID controller tuning of AVR system using GA and PSO. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: ICIC, Part II, LNCS 3645: 366-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/1153835638; (2005)

DOI: 10.1007/11538356_38

Google Scholar

[10] Venkateshwara Rao D, Suresh Kumar B, Varun Raj D, Speed control of BLDC motor with PI controller and PWM technique for antenna's positioner; (2020)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32150-5_43

Google Scholar

[11] Daya FJL , Shyam A, A comparative study on the speed response of BLDC motor using conventional PI controller, ant windup PI controller and fuzzy controller, International Conference on Control Communication and Computing (ICCC): https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC.2013.6731626; (2019)

DOI: 10.1109/iccc.2013.6731626

Google Scholar

[12] K Ang, G Chong, Y Li, PID control system analysis, design, and technology. Control System Technology IEEE Transaction on, 13(4): 559 576; (2020)

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2005.847331

Google Scholar

[13] Kennedy J, Eberhart RC, Particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ: 1942- 1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968; (2021)

DOI: 10.1109/icnn.1995.488968

Google Scholar

[14] Bianchi N, Bolognani S, Jang JH, Sul SK, Comparison of PM motor structures and sensor less control techniques for zero-speed rotor position detection. Power Electron IEEE Trans 22(6):2466–2475; (2016)

DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2007.904238

Google Scholar

[15] Zarringhalami M, Hakimi S, Javadi M, Optimal regulation of STATCOM controllers and PSS parameters using hybrid particle swarm optimization, IEEE conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHQP.2010.5625436; (2019)

DOI: 10.1109/ichqp.2010.5625436

Google Scholar

[16] Kennedy J. Swarm Intelligence. In: Zomaya A.Y. (eds) Handbook of Nature-Inspired and Innovative Computing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27705-6_6; (2019)

Google Scholar

[17] Eberhart R, Shi Y, Kennedy J, Swarm intelligence. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-595-4.X5000-1; (2019)

Google Scholar

[18] Gaing ZL, A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system. Energy Convers IEEE Trans 19(2):384–391; (2018)

DOI: 10.1109/tec.2003.821821

Google Scholar

[19] Panda S, Padhy N, Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design. Int J Appl Soft Comput 8(4):1418–1427; (2018)

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.009

Google Scholar

[20] Shi, Y, Eberhart RC, "Empirical Study of Particle Swarm Optimization." Proceedings IEEE: 1945 –1950. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.1999.785511; (2019)

Google Scholar

[21] Mirjalili Seyedali, Mirjalili Seyed Mohammad, Lewis Andrew, Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007; (2020)

Google Scholar

[22] Potnuru D, Tummala ASLV, Grey wolf optimization-based improved closed-loop speed control for a BLDC motor drive. In: Satapathy S, Bhateja V, Das S (eds) Smart intelligent computing and applications smart innovation, systems and technologies. Springer, Singapore; (2019)

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1921-1_14

Google Scholar

[23] Muniraj M, Arulmozhiyal R, Kesavan D, An improved self-tuning control mechanism for BLDC motor using grey wolf optimization algorithm. In: Bindhu V, Chen J, Tavares J (eds) International conference on communication, computing and electronics systems lecture notes in electrical engineering. Springer, Singapore; (2020)

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2612-1_30

Google Scholar

[24] Zitzler Eckart, Simon Künzli, Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search parallel problem solving from nature-PPSN VIII. Springer, Berlin Heidelbergss; (2014)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_84

Google Scholar

[25] Shamseldin MA, EL-Samahy, AA, Speed control of BLDC motor by using PID control and self-tuning fuzzy PID controller," 15th International workshop on research and education in mechatronics (REM), El Gouna pp.1-9, https://doi.org/10.1109/REM.2014.6920443; (2019)

DOI: 10.1109/rem.2014.6920443

Google Scholar