Polyhydroxybutyrate/Polylactic Acid/Polybutylene Succinate Blend Filaments for 3D Printing Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biopolymers have gained increased attention as viable alternatives to petroleum-based polymers, driven by growing awareness of sustainability and environmental impact. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), a biopolymer derived from microorganisms, holds promise for biomedical applications due to its unique properties. However, its practical use has been hindered by certain limitations. In this study, we addressed these challenges by preparing blends of PHB with polylactic acid (PLA) and polybutylene succinate (PBS) using a twin-screw extruder. The thermal analysis revealed a reduction in the degree of crystallinity for PHB after blending, while its thermal transitions remained unaffected. The resulting immiscible blends exhibited partial compatibility, with dispersed phases of PLA and PBS uniformly distributed within the PHB matrix. Subsequently, we conducted a comprehensive examination of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed specimens. Our findings indicated a notable enhancement in the flexural modulus and flexural strength of the blends upon the addition of PLA and PBS.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

53-58

Citation:

Online since:

September 2024

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2024 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Baranwal, B. Barse, A. Fais, G.L. Delogu and A. Kumar: Polymers Vol. 14 (2022)

Google Scholar

[2] S. Moroni, S. Khorshid, A. Aluigi, M. Tiboni and L. Casettari: International Journal of Pharmaceutics Vol. 623 (2022), p.121960

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121960

Google Scholar

[3] J.C.C. Yeo, J.K. Muiruri, W. Thitsartarn, Z. Li and C. He: Materials Science and Engineering: C Vol. 92 (2018), p.1092

Google Scholar

[4] M.K.M. Smith, D.M. Paleri, M. Abdelwahab, D.F. Mielewski, M. Misra and A.K. Mohanty: Green Chemistry Vol. 22 (2020), p.3906

Google Scholar

[5] W. Kanabenja, K. Passarapark, T. Subchokpool, N. Nawaaukkaratharnant, A.J. Román, T.A. Osswald, C. Aumnate and P. Potiyaraj: Additive Manufacturing Vol. 59 (2022), p.103130

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.103130

Google Scholar

[6] D.M. Panaitescu, C.A. Nicolae, A.N. Frone, I. Chiulan, P.O. Stanescu, C. Draghici, M. Iorga and M. Mihailescu: Journal of Applied Polymer Science Vol. 134 (2017)

DOI: 10.1002/app.44810

Google Scholar

[7] M. Singhvi and D. Gokhale: RSC Advances Vol. 3 (2013), p.13558

Google Scholar

[8] M. Zhang and N.L. Thomas: Advances in Polymer Technology Vol. 30 (2011), p.67

Google Scholar

[9] D.A. D'Amico, M.L. Iglesias Montes, L.B. Manfredi and V.P. Cyras: Polymer Testing Vol. 49 (2016), p.22

Google Scholar

[10] O. Platnieks, S. Gaidukovs, V. Kumar Thakur, A. Barkane and S. Beluns: European Polymer Journal Vol. 161 (2021), p.110855

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110855

Google Scholar

[11] H. Peshne and B.K. Satapathy: Journal of Polymer Research Vol. 29 (2022), p.496

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Ou-Yang, B. Guo and J. Xu: ACS Omega Vol. 3 (2018), p.14309

Google Scholar

[13] A.A. Vaidya, C. Collet, M. Gaugler and G. Lloyd-Jones: Materials Today Communications Vol. 19 (2019), p.286

Google Scholar

[14] S.E. Fenni, J. Wang, N. Haddaoui, B.D. Favis, A.J. Müller and D. Cavallo: Thermochimica Acta Vol. 677 (2019), p.117

DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2019.03.015

Google Scholar

[15] O. Olejnik, A. Masek and J. Zawadziłło: Materials Vol. 14 (2021)

Google Scholar

[16] J. Surisaeng, W. Kanabenja, N. Passornraprasit, C. Aumnate and P. Potiyaraj: Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 2175 (2022), p.012021

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2175/1/012021

Google Scholar