Assessment of the Influence of Surface Quality on the Bending Fatigue Strength of WAAM Ultra-High-Strength Steel

Abstract:

This investigation evaluates the influence of surface quality on the bending fatigue strength of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) Ultra-High-Strength (UHS) steel, The study is focused on structural integrity, hardness, surface roughness, tensile strength, and bending fatigue performance. Cross-sectional analysis reveals slight variations in wall thickness, averaging 5.5 mm, with an absence of discernible pores or defects, affirming the process's capability to yield high-quality results. Hardness assessments indicate uniformity across the deposited component, with an average hardness of 303 HV, emphasizing consistent material properties. Surface roughness analysis highlights superior fatigue strength in polished samples compared to machined and as-built ones, with roughness inversely impacting fatigue resistance. Tensile tests confirm satisfactory yield and tensile strength, with favorable ductility characteristics. Bending fatigue tests show that surface quality significantly influences fatigue strength, with polished samples exhibiting the highest fatigue limit. Conversely, as-built surfaces display the lowest fatigue strength due to increased sensitivity to crack initiation, emphasizing the critical role of surface quality in UHS steel fatigue performance. These findings underscore the suitability of WAAM-printed UHS steel for structural applications while emphasizing the importance of surface quality in determining fatigue resistance and overall component performance.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 157)
• Pages: 19-25
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-9q9SLs
• Online since: September 2024
• Authors: Mikko Hietala*, Markku Keskitalo, Matias Jaskari, Joonas Päkkilä, Antti Järvenpää
• Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, Fatigue Strength, Surface Roughness, Ultra-High-Strength Steel, Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing

References

[1] B. Weber, X. Meng, R. Zhang, M. Nitawaki, T. Sagawa and L. Gardner: Mater. Des. Vol. 237 (2024), p.112517

[2] J. Xiong, Y.J. Li and Z.Q. Yin: Chin. J. Mech. Eng. Vol. 31 (2018), p.74

[3] R. Konečná and G. Nicoletto: Procedia Struct. Integr. Vol. 23 (2019), p.384

[4] Y. Ayan and N. Kahraman: Mater. Chem. Phys. Vol. 315 (2024), p.128937

[5] K. Kozáková and J. Klusák: Procedia Struct. Integr. Vol. 43 (2023), p.178

[6] H. Zhang, C. Li, G. Yao, Y. Shi and Y. Zhang: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 160 (2022), p.106838

[7] M. Subasic, M. Olsson, S. Dadbakhsh, X. Zhao, P. Krakhmalev and R. Mansour: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 180 (2024), p.108077

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108077

[8] L.C. Araujo, L. Malcher, D. de Oliveira and J.A. Araújo: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 178 (2024) p.107981

[9] S. Zhou, J. Zhang, G. Yang, Y. Wang, B. Li, D. An, J. Zheng and W. Wei: J. Mater. Res. Technol. Vol. 28 (2024), p.347

[10] M. Dinovitzer, X. Chen, J. Laliberte, X. Huang and H. Frei: Addit. Manuf. Vol. 26 (2019), p.138

[11] Y. Zhang, X. Sang, G. Xu, G. Wang and M. Zhao: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 177 (2023), p.107921

[12] T.A. Rodrigues, V.R. Duarte, D. Tomás, J.A. Avila, J.D. Escobar, E. Rossinyol, N. Schell, T.G. Santos and J.P. Oliveira: Addit. Manuf. Vol. 34 (2020), p.101200

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101200

[13] M.T. Chen, T. Zhang, Z. Gong, W. Zuo, Z. Wang, L. Zong, O. Zhao and L. Hu: Eng. Struct. Vol. 300 (2024), p.117092

[14] F. Uriati and G. Nicoletto: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 162 (2022), p.107004

[15] N. Yamaguchi, Y. Tokita, T. Shiozaki, Y. Tamai, Y. Ichikawa and K. Ogawa: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 175 (2023), p.107819

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107819

[16] Information on https://www.iso.org/standard/78322.html, Metallic materials, Tensile testing, Part 1: Method of test at room temperature (ISO 6892-1:2019)