Mini-Grid Sustainability Framework and its Application to Selected Mini-Grids in Kenya

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an indicator-based framework for the sustainability analysis of mini-grids and applies this to a selection of mini-grids in Kenya. Although various frameworks exist, they have been criticised for lack of attention to long-term perspectives, high data needs, prescriptive nature of the attributes and limited user-friendliness. Considering that data availability is a major concern and that data available is qualitative in nature, this paper proposes a set of indicators and a scoring system that can be used with a broad qualitative understanding of the sustainability attributes of the mini-grids. The paper first presents the framework and the scoring system and applies this to the data gathered from the fieldwork in Kenya. The results indicate that the significant variation in sustainability performance of the mini-grids covered and the performance is relatively good in technical and economic dimensions and relatively poor in social, institutional and environmental dimensions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-154

Citation:

Online since:

February 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank, WHO, Tracking SDG7: The Energy Progress Report, World Bank, World Bank, Washington DC, 2021. [2] World Bank, Mini-grids for half a billion people: market outlook and handbook for decision makers, World Bank, Washington DC, 2019. [3] D. Bukari, A. Hatamimarbini, S. C. Bhattacharyya, D. Kerr, L. Baker, E. Onsongo, T. Sesan, E. N. Sawe and A. Pueyo, On the technical sustainability of mini-grids in developing countries: A Comprehensive review of literature., SIGMA Working Paper Series, p. Working Paper No. 2, 2023. [4] E. Ilskog, Indicators for assessment of rural electrification—An approach for the comparison of pears and apples, Energy Policy, p.2665

DOI: 10.1596/42954

Google Scholar