Predicting Remaining Useful Life Using AdaBoost Algorithm

Abstract:

Predicting the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of machinery and critical components is crucial for proactive maintenance and operational efficiency in industrial settings. This paper presents an approach to RUL prediction using the AdaBoost algorithm, a technique that iteratively improves prediction accuracy by focusing on difficult-to-predict cases. The AdaBoost algorithm will be extended to handle both binary and multi-class classification, enabling it to distinguish between various stages of degradation. By providing more granular insights into the health status of components, this approach enhances maintenance planning by allowing for more targeted, condition-based interventions. Early detection of varying levels of wear allows maintenance teams to schedule repairs or part replacements precisely when needed, reducing unplanned downtime and optimizing resource allocation. This study demonstrates the adaptability of AdaBoost in handling complex RUL prediction scenarios, thus supporting a more effective and data-driven approach to predictive maintenance in industrial applications.

• Periodical: Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 165)
• Pages: 107-114
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-3vQCF6
• Online since: June 2025
• Authors: Olivér Hornyák*
• Keywords: AI, Machine Learning, Remaining Useful Life

References

[1] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 13381-1:2004 – Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Machines – Prognostics – General Guidelines, ISO, Geneva, 2004.

[2] D.A. Tobon-Mejia, K. Medjaher, N. Zerhouni, The ISO 13381-1 standard's failure prognostics process through an example, 2010 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, 2010, pp.1-12.

DOI: 10.1109/phm.2010.5413482

[3] M. Baur, P. Albertelli, M. Monno, A review of prognostics and health management of machine tools, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 110, no. 5-6, pp.1417-1438, 2020

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05202-3

[4] M. Ben-Daya, S.O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic, D. Ait-Kadi (Eds.), Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering, Springer, London, 2009

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0

[5] E.I. Basri, I.H. Abdul Razak, H. Ab-Samat, S. Kamaruddin, Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: a review, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 23, pp.114-143, 2017.

DOI: 10.1108/jqme-04-2016-0014

[6] A.K.S. Jardine, D. Lin, D. Banjevic, A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 20, pp.1483-1510, 2006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012

[7] M. Kordestani, M.E. Orchard, K. Khorasani, M. Saif, An overview of the state of the art in aircraft prognostic and health management strategies, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp.1-15, 2023.

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2023.3236342

[8] C. Li, S. Li, Y. Feng, K. Gryllias, F. Gu, M. Pecht, Small data challenges for intelligent prognostics and health management: a review, Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 8, p.214, 2024.

DOI: 10.1007/s10462-024-10820-4

[9] F.W. Taylor, On the art of cutting metals, vol. 23, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1906.

[10] A. Mosallam, K. Medjaher, N. Zerhouni, Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, pp.1037-1048, 2014.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0933-4

[11] A. Tayade, S. Patil, V. Phalle, F. Kazi, S. Powar, Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of bearing by using regression model and principal component analysis (PCA) technique, Vibroengineering Procedia, vol. 23, pp.30-36, 2019.

DOI: 10.21595/vp.2019.20617

[12] Z. Kang, C. Catal, B. Tekinerdogan, Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of equipment in production lines using artificial neural networks, Sensors, vol. 21, no. 3, p.932, 2021.

DOI: 10.3390/s21030932

[13] A. Widodo, B.S. Yang, Machine health prognostics using survival probability and support vector machine, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp.8430-8437, 2011.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.038

[14] C. Louen, S.X. Ding, C. Kandler, A new framework for remaining useful life estimation using support vector machine classifier, in: 2013 Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems (SysTol), IEEE, Oct. 2013, pp.228-233.

DOI: 10.1109/systol.2013.6693833

[15] L. Zhang, Z. Liu, D. Luo, J. Li, H.Z. Huang, "Review of remaining useful life prediction using support vector machine for engineering assets," in: 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), IEEE, July 2013, pp.1793-1799.

DOI: 10.1109/qr2mse.2013.6625925

[16] Y. Freund, R.E. Schapire, A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55 (1) (1997) 119–139

DOI: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504

[17] https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/m0ntecarl0/engine-time-to-failure

[18] O. Hornyák, Data-Driven Engine Health Monitoring with AI. Eng. Proc. 2024, 79, 39

DOI: 10.3390/engproc2024079039

[19] O. Hornyák, Predicting Remaining Useful Life Using AdaBoost Algorithm python code https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1S_QDf2M2AwQPD4N5JUQdwMxBefor_JC0