Optimization of Infill Parameters for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS)

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, the infill parameters of fabricated samples of additively manufactured PEEK using FFF is analyzed and an optimized model of ANFIS tends to predict the tensile strength of printed part. The goal is to get the best “trade-off” between minimizing the amount of printing time and printed material and maximizing tensile strength. This is done through experimentation understanding the contribution of the combination of three infill type (IP): Gyroid, Line, and Tri-hexagon and three infill density (ID): 30, 50, and 70% to the tensile strength of the printed part. An Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is used to model the non-linear relationship between the two input and output factors. ANFIS combines the strength of both neural networks and fuzzy logic properties, the purpose is to leverage the learning capabilities of neural networks in defining complex rules for the fuzzy inference system. One-hot encoding is used to convert IP, categorical to numerical data. The generated FIS structure with grid partition of [3, 3] with gaussian membership function with a total of 15 rules. The FIS model is trained, tested, and checked with an RMSE of 2.2383, 1.0298, and 1.4846 respectively and coefficient of correlation of 0.8958. The ANFIS surface plot suggests two optimal points, both for Line IP and with two ID of 35% and 55% yielding approximately around 40 MPa and 50 MPa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-9

Citation:

Online since:

August 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. S. Saad, A. Mohd Nor, M. Z. Zakaria, M. E. Baharudin, and W. S. Yusoff, "Modelling and evolutionary computation optimization on FDM process for flexural strength using integrated approach RSM and PSO," Progress in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 6, no. 1, p.143–154, Feb. 2021.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-020-00157-z

Google Scholar

[2] J. Y. Lee, J. An, and C. K. Chua, "Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials," Jun. 01, 2017, Elsevier Ltd.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004

Google Scholar

[3] M. K. Pitchan, S. Bhowmik, M. Balachandran, and M. Abraham, "Process optimization of functionalized MWCNT/polyetherimide nanocomposites for aerospace application," Mater Des, vol. 127, p.193–203, Aug. 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.081

Google Scholar

[4] I. Blanco, G. Cicala, G. Ognibene, M. Rapisarda, and A. Recca, "Thermal properties of polyetherimide/polycarbonate blends for advanced applications," Polym Degrad Stab, vol. 154, p.234–238, Aug. 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.06.011

Google Scholar

[5] G. Nyiranzeyimana, J. M. Mutua, B. R. Mose, and T. O. Mbuya, "Optimization of process parameters in fused deposition modelling of thermoplastics: A review," Materwiss Werksttech, vol. 52, no. 6, p.682–694, Jun. 2021.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.202000193

Google Scholar

[6] A. Lustiger, F. S. Uralil, and G. M. Newaz, "Processing and Structural Optimization of PEEK Composites."

Google Scholar

[7] M. F. Arif, S. Kumar, K. M. Varadarajan, and W. J. Cantwell, "Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing," Mater Des, vol. 146, p.249–259, May 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015

Google Scholar

[8] N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, N. Mountakis, and E. Karapidakis, "Box-Behnken modeling to quantify the impact of control parameters on the energy and tensile efficiency of PEEK in MEX 3D-printing," Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 7, Jul. 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18363

Google Scholar

[9] K. Park, G. Kim, H. No, H. W. Jeon, and G. E. O. Kremer, "Identification of optimal process parameter settings based on manufacturing performance for fused filament fabrication of CFR-PEEK," Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 13, Jul. 2020.

DOI: 10.3390/app10134630

Google Scholar

[10] R. B. Kristiawan, F. Imaduddin, D. Ariawan, Ubaidillah, and Z. Arifin, "A review on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing: Filament processing, materials, and printing parameters," Jan. 01, 2021, De Gruyter Open Ltd.

DOI: 10.1515/eng-2021-0063

Google Scholar

[11] A. Pandzic, D. Hodzic, and A. Milovanovic, "Effect of infill type and density on tensile properties of pla material for fdm process," in Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium, Danube Adria Association for Automation and Manufacturing, DAAAM, 2019, p.545–554.

DOI: 10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.074

Google Scholar

[12] A. Forés-Garriga, M. A. Pérez, G. Gómez-Gras, and G. Reyes-Pozo, "Role of infill parameters on the mechanical performance and weight reduction of PEI Ultem processed by FFF," Mater Des, vol. 193, Aug. 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108810

Google Scholar

[13] C. C. Santiago et al., "Thermoplastic extrusion additive manufacturing of high-performance carbon fiber peek lattices," Crystals (Basel), vol. 11, no. 12, Dec. 2021.

DOI: 10.3390/cryst11121453

Google Scholar

[14] X. Deng, Z. Zeng, B. Peng, S. Yan, and W. Ke, "Mechanical properties optimization of poly-ether-ether-ketone via fused deposition modeling," Materials, vol. 11, no. 2, Jan. 2018.

DOI: 10.3390/ma11020216

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Wang, W. D. Müller, A. Rumjahn, F. Schmidt, and A. D. Schwitalla, "Mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated PEEK for biomedical applications depending on additive manufacturing parameters," J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, vol. 115, Mar. 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104250

Google Scholar

[16] M. S. Saad, A. M. Nor, M. E. Baharudin, M. Z. Zakaria, and A. F. Aiman, "Optimization of surface roughness in FDM 3D printer using response surface methodology, particle swarm optimization, and symbiotic organism search algorithms," International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 105, no. 12, p.5121–5137, Dec. 2019.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04568-3

Google Scholar

[17] D. Yadav, D. Chhabra, R. Kumar Garg, A. Ahlawat, and A. Phogat, "Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters for multi-material using artificial neural network," in Materials Today: Proceedings, Elsevier Ltd, 2020, p.1583–1591.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225

Google Scholar

[18] J. Borah and M. Chandrasekaran, "Experimental investigation and development of Artificial neural network modeling of 3D printed PEEK bio implants and its optimization," 2023.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3204960/v1

Google Scholar

[19] S. R. Rajpurohit and H. K. Dave, "Prediction and Optimization of Tensile Strength in FDM Based 3D Printing Using ANFIS," 2020, p.111–128.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19638-7_5

Google Scholar

[20] A. Peng, X. Xiao, and R. Yue, "Process parameter optimization for fused deposition modeling using response surface methodology combined with fuzzy inference system," International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 73, no. 1–4, p.87–100, 2014.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5

Google Scholar

[21] M. Srivastava, S. Rathee, S. Maheshwari, and T. K. Kundra, "Multi-objective optimisation of fused deposition modelling process parameters using RSM and fuzzy logic for build time and support material," International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, vol. 7, no. 1, p.25, 2018.

DOI: 10.1504/ijrapidm.2018.089727

Google Scholar

[22] B. Vinay et al., "Influence of Printing Parameters on Mechanical Behavior of 3D-Printed PLA Using Taguchi Based ANFIS Technique," Materials Science Forum, vol. 1110, p.159–174, Jul. 2023.

DOI: 10.4028/p-LsQr5J

Google Scholar

[23] "Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics 1".

DOI: 10.1520/D0638-14

Google Scholar

[24] V. D. Sagias, P. Zacharia, A. Tempeloudis, and C. Stergiou, "Mechanical Properties Predictive Model of Additive Manufacturing Specimens Using ANFIS," 2024.

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202407.0094.v1

Google Scholar