Influence of Dimethyl Carbonate on Graphite Surface Film Formation Revealed by Potential-Resolved in situ Atomic Force Microscopy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ethylene carbonate (EC) is essential for establishing a passivating surface film on graphite; in practice, however, EC is commonly blended with dimethyl carbonate (DMC), which alters Li+ solvation and interfacial chemistry. Here, we compare 1 mol dm3 (M) LiClO4/EC+DMC with 1 M LiClO4/DMC using in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy (AFM) during cyclic voltammetry on the basal plane of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). Both media follow a two-stage pathway—solvent cointercalation (subsurface pre-insertion) followed by surface precipitate formation—yet their electrochemical responses and morphologies diverge. In EC+DMC, pronounced second-cycle suppression of the cathodic current accompanies the development of a laterally continuous, fine particulate precipitate layer after the first cycle. In the DMC‑only electrolyte, large cathodic currents persist and AFM reveals edge-dominated blistering, step disruption, and patchy deposits, indicative of sustained cointercalation and incomplete passivation. Taken together, these results indicate that the principal passivating film is EC-derived, whereas DMC chiefly modulates cointercalation and coalescence kinetics, thereby amplifying lateral heterogeneity. The measurements provide potential-resolved benchmarks for formation-protocol design and a reference for interpreting mixed-carbonate electrolytes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

47-52

Citation:

Online since:

May 2026

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Fong, U. von Sacken, and J.R. Dahn, Studies of lithium intercalation into carbons using nonaqueous electrochemical cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 2009–2013.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2086855

Google Scholar

[2] T. Ohzuku, Y. Iwakoshi, and K. Sawai, Formation of lithium‑graphite intercalation compounds in nonaqueous electrolytes and their application as a negative electrode for a lithium‑ion (shuttlecock) cell, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140 (1993) 2490–2498.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2220849

Google Scholar

[3] E. Peled, The electrochemical behavior of alkali and alkaline earth metals in nonaqueous battery systems—The solid electrolyte interphase model, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126 (1979) 2047–2051.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2128859

Google Scholar

[4] K. Xu, Electrolytes and interphases in Li‑ion batteries and beyond, Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 11503–11618.

DOI: 10.1021/cr500003w

Google Scholar

[5] P. Verma, P. Maire, and P. Novák, A review of the features and interpretations of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li‑ion batteries, Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 6332–6341.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.072

Google Scholar

[6] M. Inaba, Z. Siroma, A. Funabiki, Z. Ogumi, T. Abe, Y. Mizutani, and M. Asano, Electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy analysis of the surface reactions on graphite basal plane in ethylene carbonate‑based solvents and propylene carbonate, J. Power Sources 68 (1997) 221–226.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(96)02555-4

Google Scholar

[7] S.-K. Jeong, M. Inaba, T. Abe, and Z. Ogumi, Surface film formation on graphite negative electrode in lithium‑ion batteries: AFM study in an ethylene carbonate‑based solution, J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 (2001) A989–A993.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1387981

Google Scholar

[8] S.-K. Jeong, M. Inaba, Y. Iriyama, T. Abe, and Z. Ogumi, Surface film formation on a graphite negative electrode in lithium‑ion batteries: AFM study on the effects of co‑solvents in ethylene carbonate‑based solutions, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 1975–1982.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4686(02)00099-3

Google Scholar

[9] M. Inaba, H. Tomiyasu, A. Tasaka, S.-K. Jeong, Y. Iriyama, T. Abe, and Z. Ogumi, Surface film formation on graphite negative electrode at elevated temperatures, Electrochemistry 71 (2003) 1132–1135.

DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.71.1132

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Domi, M. Ochida, S. Tsubouchi, H. Nakagawa, T. Yamanaka, T. Doi, T. Abe, and Z. Ogumi, Thickness and plane dependence of the surface film formed on graphite in carbonate electrolytes studied by AFM, J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (2011) 25484–25490.

DOI: 10.1021/jp2064672

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Zhang, K. Smith, R. Jervis, P.R. Shearing, T.S. Miller, and D.J.L. Brett, Operando electrochemical atomic force microscopy of solid–electrolyte interphase formation on graphite anodes: The evolution of SEI morphology and mechanical properties, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 35132–35141.

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c11190

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Zhang, S. Said, K. Smith, R. Jervis, P.R. Shearing, T.S. Miller, and D.J.L. Brett, Characterizing batteries by in situ electrochemical atomic force microscopy: A critical review, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2101518.

DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202101518

Google Scholar

[13] J.E.N. Swallow, M.W. Fraser, N.-J.H. Kneusels, J.F. Charlton, C.G. Sole, C.M.E. Phelan, E. Björklund, P. Bencok, C. Escudero, V. Pérez‑Dieste, C.P. Grey, R.J. Nicholls, and R.S. Weatherup, Revealing solid electrolyte interphase formation through interface‑sensitive operando X‑ray absorption spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 13 (2022) 6070.

DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-q2bzh-v2

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Chen, W. Wu, S. Gonzalez‑Munoz, L. Forcieri, C. Wells, S.P. Jarvis, F. Wu, R. Young, A. Dey, M. Isaacs, M. Nagarathinam, R.G. Palgrave, N. Tapia‑Ruiz, and O.V. Kolosov, Nanoarchitecture factors of solid electrolyte interphase formation via 3D nano‑rheology microscopy and surface force‑distance spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 1321.

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37033-7

Google Scholar

[15] R. Lundström, N. Gogoi, T. Melin, and E.J. Berg, Unveiling reaction pathways of ethylene carbonate and vinylene carbonate in Li‑ion batteries, J. Phys. Chem. C 128 (2024) 8147–8153.

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00927

Google Scholar