Paper Titles

Effects of Firing Temperature and Time on the Luminescency of Phosphors in Strontium Aluminate System Co-Doped by Eu₂O₃ and Dy₂O₃ and Prepared by Solid State Reaction Processing
p.82

Influences of Eu²⁺ and Dy³⁺ Contents on the Properties of Long Afterglow Strontium Aluminate Phosphors
p.88

Synthesis and Luminescence Properties of Rare-Earth Doped Gadolinium Silicon Oxynitride with Cuspidine Structure
p.95

Preparation and Characterization of New Oxyfluoride Phases (Ba,Na)(Ti,Mg)(O,F)
p.101

The Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics La₂O₃ Doped, Sol-Gel Derived Mullite
p.107

Sol-Gel Synthesis Assisted by Supercritical CO₂ - A Flexible Process for Ceramic Powder and Membrane Preparation
p.113

Production of Foundry Filters Using Al₂O₃ from the Al-Anodizing Process
p.119

Synthesis and Characterization of Al₂O₃(Matrix)-30%ZrO₂ and Al₂O₃(Matrix)- 30%Y_0.1Zr_0.9O₂ Nanocomposites
p.125

Theoretical and Experimental Analyses of Colloidal Processing of Nanoparticles
p.131

HomeAdvances in Science and TechnologyAdvances in Science and Technology Vol. 62The Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Crystallization...

The Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics La₂O₃ Doped, Sol-Gel Derived Mullite

Article Preview

Abstract:

The crystallization kinetic parameters of mullite formation from gels doped with La2O3 in 0.99, 1.96 and 2.91 mol% were determined by differential thermal analysis (DTA) under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. The gels were prepared by sol-gel process from aluminum and lanthanum nitrate precursors and TEOS dissolved in ethanol (molar ratio Al/Si=3:1) Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron microscopy analysis methods (SEM, EDS) were used to characterize the present phases. Lanthanum forms no separate crystal phases and its incorporation ability in mullite lattice is neglectable, yet by promoting amorphous phase formation lanthanum evidently influences the mullite composition by making it rich in Al2O3. The obtained activation energies for the mullite crystallization process in non-doped sample are higher than 1300 kJmol-1. The increase of doping level brings the activation energies below 1100 kJmol-1 for the sample with highest amount of lanthanum, i.e. with the greatest deviation from stoichiometric mullite composition.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

12th INTERNATIONAL CERAMICS CONGRESS PART A

Info:

Periodical:

Advances in Science and Technology (Volume 62)

Pages:

107-112

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.62.107

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2010

Authors:

Vilko Mandić, Emilija Tkalcec, Stanislav Kurajica

Keywords:

Activation Energy, Crystallization Kinetic, Lanthanum, Mullite, Sol-Gel (SG)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W.E. Cameron, Am. Mineral. 62 (1977) 747–755.

[2] R.J. Angel and C.T. Prewitt, Am. Mineral. 71 (1986) 1476–1482.

[3] H. Schneider, J. Schreuer, B. Hildmann, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 28, 2, (2008) 329-344.

[4] J.A. Pask and A.P. Tomsia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 2367–2373.

[5] D.X. Li, W.J. Thomson, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (1990) 964–969.

[6] J.C. Huling and G.L. Messing, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 147/148 (1992) 2: 13-22: 1.

[7] J.A. Pask, X.W. Zhang, A.P. Tomsia, B.E. Yoldas, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (1987) 704–707.

[8] U. Selvaraj, S. Komarnemi and R. Roy, J. Solid State Chem. 106 (1993) 73–82.

[9] K. Okada, N. Otsuka, S. Somiya, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 70.

[10] (1991) 1633–1640.

[10] M. Sales and J. Alarcón, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 16 (1996) 781–789.

[11] K. Okada, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28.

[2] (2008) 377-382.

[12] D. X. Li and W. J. Thomson, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73.

[4] (1990) 964–969.

[13] E. Tkalcec, R. Nass, J. Schmauch, H. Schmidt, S. Kurajica, A. Bezjak, H. Ivankovic, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 223.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(97)00429-8

[1] (1998) 57–72.

[14] B. R. Johnson, W. M. Kriven, J. Schneider, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 21.

[14] (2001) 2541–2562.

[15] K. Okada, J. Kaneda, Y. Kameshima, A. Yasumori, T. Takei, Mater. Lett, 57 (2003) 3155-3159.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(03)00013-2

[16] A. Douy, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 26.

[8] (2006) 1447–1454.

[17] H. Schneider, pp.135-57 in Ceramic Transactions, Vol. 6, Mullite and mullite matrix composites.

[18] K. Okada and N. Otsuka, Formation processes of mullite, pp.375-387 in Ceramic transactions, Vol. 6, Mullite and mullite composites, Eds. S. Somiya, R. F. Davies and J. A. Pask, American Ceramic Society, Westerville (1990).

[19] M. Ferreira de Souza, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85.

[1] (2002) 232–38.

[20] L.B. Kong, T.S. Zhang, J. Ma, F. Boey, R.F. Zhang, J. Alloys Comp 372 (2004) 290–299.

[21] I. Regiani, W.L.E. Magalhaes, D.P. Ferreira de Souza, C.O. Paiva-Santos, M.F. de Souza, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85.

[1] (2002) 232-238.

[22] W. A. Johnson and R. F. Mehl, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Engrs., 135 (1939) 416-458.

[23] V. Mandic, E. Tkalcec, S. Kurajica, Proceedings MTM2008, Ed. M. Nasr, CMRDI, Kairo, (2008).

[24] T. Akahira, T. Sunose, T. Trans. Joint Convention of Four Electrical Institutes, Paper No. 246, 1969. Research Report, Res. Rep. Chiba Inst. Technol. 16 22 (1971).

[25] J. W. Christian, part 1st, 2nd edition, Pergamon press, New York, (1975).