Medium to Long Term Engineering Properties and Performance of High-Strength Geopolymers for Structural Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

The medium to long term engineering performance of high-strength geopolymer concrete systems are largely dependent on fluid ingress and the transport phenomena that govern permeability of structural members exposed to aggressive environments. For the purpose of analysing durability performance, both high pressure water and gas permeability testing of fly-ash geopolymer(GP) concretes have been assessed for samples cured under ambient and steam exposure conditions at 65OC. The observed mean permeability coefficient values for gas(k) and water(Kw) of steam-cured structural grade concrete was respectively 6.19E-17m2 at 300kPa gas pressure and 1.52E-10m/s at 525kPa water pressure. While mean gas permeability values were comparable to reference steam-cured ordinary Portland cement(OPC) systems, the corresponding water permeability coefficient data for geopolymer concrete was ten-fold higher. The transport properties of OPC concrete systems are typically governed by water-to-cement ratio and the degree of hydration which is linked to the level of porosity and pore interconnectivity. However, corresponding permeability of geopolymer concrete appears to be dictated by an inherent mesoporous capillary pore network structure for which transport properties appear to be partly dependent on mode of concrete curing. The Paper examines global implications of increased permeability and key durability parameters such as chloride diffusion, carbonation rates and steel reinforcement corrosion on long-term engineering and durability performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

135-142

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L, Basheer, J. Kropp, D. J. Cleland Assessment of the durability of concrete from its permeation properties: a review. Construction and Building Materials 15, 93-103(2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-0618(00)00058-1

Google Scholar

[2] E.J. Garboczi Permeability, diffusivity and micro-structural parameters. A critical review. Cement Concr Res, 20 pp, 990: 591-601(1990).

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(90)90101-3

Google Scholar

[3] P. B Bamforth. The relationship between permeability coefficients for concrete obtained using liquid and gas. Mag Concr Res; 39(138): 3–10 (1987).

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1987.39.138.3

Google Scholar

[4] J. Merchand, B Gerard. Microstructure-based models for predicting transport properties. In: Reinhardt HW, editor. RILEM report no. 16: penetration and permeability of concrete. E&FN Spon; (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Davidovits, Properties of geopolymer cements, in: P.V. Krivenko (Ed. ), Alkaline cements and concretes, vol. 1, Vipol Stock, Kiev, Ukraine, p.131– 149. (1994).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Criado., A Palomo., A Fernandez-Jimenez. Alkali activation of fly ashes. Part 1: Effect of curing conditions on the carbonation of the reaction products. Fuel 84 2048–2054(2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.030

Google Scholar

[7] H. Xu, J.S. J Van Deventer. The geopolymerisation of aluminosilicate minerals. Int J Miner Process; 59 : 247–66. (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] J. M Miranda., A. Fernandez-Jimenez., J. A Gonzalez., A. Palomo. Corrosion resistance in activated fly ash mortars Cement and Concrete Research 35 1210– 1217(2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.030

Google Scholar

[9] P. V Krivenko,. Alkaline cements: terminology, classification aspects of durability, Proc. of 10th Int. Cong. Chem. Cem, pp. 4iv046– 4iv050. Goteborg (Sweden). (1997).

Google Scholar

[10] W.M. Kriven, J. L Bell, S. W. Mallicoat, and M Gordon, 'Intrinsic Microstructure and Properties of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers, p.71–86 in Int. Workshop on Geopolymer Binders, Interdependence of Composition, Structure and Properties. Edited by Bauhaus-Universitat¨ Weimar, Germany, (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] K K Aligizaki. Pore structure of cement-based materials: testing, interpretation and requirements. Taylor & Francis; (2006).

Google Scholar

[12] J W Figg. Methods of measuring the air and water permeability of concrete. Mag Concr Res, Lond ; 25( 85): 213-219 (1984).

Google Scholar

[13] G. J. Verbeck. Pore structure significance of tests and properties of concrete and concrete making materials. ASTM Special Tech Publ; 169A: 211-19(1982).

DOI: 10.1520/stp35618s

Google Scholar

[14] AS 1012. 9(1999)-Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens(1999).

Google Scholar

[15] R. P Khatri, V Sirivivatnanon, Methods for the determination of water permeability of concrete. ACI Mater J., 94 (3) 257-61(1997).

Google Scholar

[16] P.A. M Basheer. A brief review of methods for measuring the permeation properties of concrete in-situ. Build Struct Inst Civil Eng 1993; 99, 1. 74-83.

Google Scholar

[17] G. J Verbeck. Carbonation of hydrated Portland cement. Am Soc Test Mater; 17–36(1958).

Google Scholar

[18] J Merchand, Gerard B. Microstructure-based models for predicting transport properties. In: Reinhardt HW, editor. RILEM report no. 16: penetration and permeability of concrete. E&FN Spon; (1997).

Google Scholar

[19] L. O. Nilsson et al., Chloride penetration into concrete, State-of-the-art, transport processes, corrosion initiation, test methods and prediction models, The Report No. 53, Road Directorate, Copenhagen,: 151 pp. (1996).

Google Scholar