A Review on Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Seismic Analysis of Timber Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the last two decades, great progress in Machine Learning can be seen in various fields of structural engineering including seismic analysis. This paper focuses on the cross-filed of Machine Learning (ML) and seismic engineering and provides an overview on different ML techniques been used in seismic analysis studies, compare these techniques and their application to study the seismic response of timber structures. The comparison of common supervised ML techniques in this paper are Multi Linear Regression, Regression Tree, Regression Forest, K Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Regression and Artificial Neural Networks. The recent increase in studies of ML is largely focused on Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures but its application for the behavior of timber structures is still to be explored. Timber structures are considered as the best performing material under strong ground motions. However, the problems associated with timber structures are lack of experimental data, standard numerical models and design codes. It has been observed that application of ML in this domain is new but considered as an increasingly dynamic area of high impact result where new horizons of research topics are waiting to be investigated. The review of different studies demonstrated the potential of improving the prediction of seismic performance and structural behavior by the use of ML. These methods allow more efficient and accurate modelling of complex problems than traditional methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

139-147

Citation:

Online since:

April 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. M. Somasekharaiah, M. S. Y. B, and M. B. S, "A Comparative Study on Lateral Force Resisting System For Seismic Loads," p.1138–1144, 2016.

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Liu, W. Zhang, M. W. Bhatt, and A. Kumar, "No Title," Nonlinear Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, p.574–582, 2021, doi:.

DOI: 10.1515/nleng-2021-0048

Google Scholar

[3] S. Fenves and T. Norabhoompipat, "POTENTIALS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND DETAILING.," [No source Inf. available].

Google Scholar

[4] J. Bennett, L. Creary, and R. Englemore, "James Bennett, Lewis Creary, Robert Englemore and Robert klosh COMPUTER S C I E N C E D E P A R T M E N T School of Humanities and Sciences STANFORD UNIVERSITY," no. September, 1978.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Sun, "tngineering," vol. 5, 1990.

Google Scholar

[6] M. C. Porcu, C. Bosu, and I. Gavrić, "Non-linear dynamic analysis to assess the seismic performance of cross-laminated timber structures," J. Build. Eng., vol. 19, p.480–493, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.008

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Xie, M. Eeri, M. E. Sichani, J. E. Padgett, M. Eeri, and M. Eeri, "The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering : A state-of-the-art review," 2020.

DOI: 10.1177/8755293020919419

Google Scholar

[8] A. Alam, "Define machine learning and describe the main types of machine learning," no. August, 2023.

Google Scholar

[9] D. H. Maulud and A. M. Abdulazeez, "A Review on Linear Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning," vol. 01, no. 04, p.140–147, 2020.

DOI: 10.38094/jastt1457

Google Scholar

[10] O. Karayel and G. Özay, "Seismic Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Building Stock Using Artificial Neural Network and Linear Regression Analysis BT - Sustainable Civil Engineering at the Beginning of Third Millennium," 2024, p.374–386.

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-1781-1_35

Google Scholar

[11] M. Mondol, "Analysis and Prediction of Earthquakes using different Machine Learning techniques," p.2–10, 2021.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Kwag, D. Hahm, M. Kim, and S. Eem, "Development of a Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment Model of Slope Using Machine Learning Methods," 2020.

DOI: 10.3390/su12083269

Google Scholar

[13] B. U. Gokkaya, J. W. Baker, and G. G. Deierlein, "Estimation and impacts of model parameter correlation for seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete structures," Struct. Saf., vol. 69, p.68–78, 2017.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.07.005

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Jabari, S. Mohammad, I. Khodakarami, and F. Behnamfar, "Development of seismic fragility curves for RC / MR frames using machine learning methods," Asian J. Civ. Eng., vol. 24, no. 3, p.823–836, 2023.

DOI: 10.1007/s42107-022-00533-w

Google Scholar

[15] H. D. Nguyen, Y.-J. Lee, J. M. LaFave, and M. Shin, "Seismic fragility analysis of steel moment frames using machine learning models," Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 126, p.106976, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106976

Google Scholar

[16] H. Dabiri, A. Faramarzi, A. Dall'Asta, E. Tondi, and F. Micozzi, "A machine learning-based analysis for predicting fragility curve parameters of buildings," J. Build. Eng., vol. 62, p.105367, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105367

Google Scholar

[17] A. Cutler, D. R. Cutler, and J. R. Stevens, "Random Forests," no. February 2014, 2011.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7

Google Scholar

[18] J. Yang, H. Zhuang, G. Zhang, B. Tang, and C. Xu, "Seismic performance and fragility of two-story and three-span underground structures using a random forest model and a new damage description method," Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., vol. 135, p.104980, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104980

Google Scholar

[19] F. Kazemi, N. Asgarkhani, and R. Jankowski, "Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures," Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 166, p.107761, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761

Google Scholar

[20] R. Segura, J. E. Padgett, A. M. Asce, P. Paultre, and M. Asce, "Metamodel-Based Seismic Fragility Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams," vol. 146, no. 7, p.1–17, 2020.

DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002629

Google Scholar

[21] S. Mangalathu, "Stripe ‐ based fragility analysis of multispan concrete bridge classes using machine learning techniques," no. April, p.1–18, 2019.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3183

Google Scholar

[22] K. Taunk, S. De, S. Verma, and A. Swetapadma, "MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFICATION WITH K-NEAREST NEIGHBOURS," no. January 2021, 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/ICCS45141.2019.9065747

Google Scholar

[23] Y. Shi, K. Yang, Z. Yang, and Y. B. T.-M. E. A. I. Zhou, Eds., "Contents," Academic Press, 2022, pp. v–ix.

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823817-2.00004-8

Google Scholar

[24] L. Y. Hu, M. W. Huang, S. W. Ke, and C. F. Tsai, "The distance function effect on k ‑ nearest neighbor classification for medical datasets," 2016.

DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2941-7

Google Scholar

[25] V. Calofir, R. Munteanu, M. Simoiu, and K. Lemnaru, "Results in Engineering Innovative approach to estimate structural damage using linear regression and K-nearest neighbors machine learning algorithms," Results Eng., vol. 22, no. April, p.102250, 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102250

Google Scholar

[26] N. Saleem, S. Mangalathu, B. Ahmed, and J.-S. Jeon, "Machine learning-based peak ground acceleration models for structural risk assessment using spatial data analysis," Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 53, no. 1, p.152–178, Jan. 2024.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4021

Google Scholar

[27] S. Mangalathu, H. Sun, C. C. Nweke, Z. Yi, and H. V Burton, "Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning," Earthq. Spectra, vol. 36, no. 1, p.183–208, Jan. 2020.

DOI: 10.1177/8755293019878137

Google Scholar

[28] A. Roy and S. Chakraborty, "Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 233, p.109126, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109126

Google Scholar

[29] R. Sainct, C. Feau, J.-M. Martinez, and J. Garnier, "Efficient methodology for seismic fragility curves estimation by active learning on Support Vector Machines," Struct. Saf., vol. 86, p.101972, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101972

Google Scholar

[30] S. N. Mahmoudi and L. Chouinard, "Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges using support vector machines," Bull. Earthq. Eng., vol. 14, no. 6, p.1571–1587, 2016.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9894-7

Google Scholar

[31] M. S. B. Maind, "Research Paper on Basic of Artificial Neural Network," no. January, p.96–100, 2014.

Google Scholar

[32] E. Binali, "Activation functions used in artificial neural networks," no. October, 2023.

Google Scholar

[33] Z. Liu and Z. Zhang, "Artificial Neural Network based method for seismic fragility analysis of steel frames," KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 22, May 2017.

DOI: 10.1007/s12205-017-1329-8

Google Scholar

[34] Z. Wang, N. Pedroni, I. Zentner, and E. Zio, "Seismic fragility analysis with artificial neural networks: Application to nuclear power plant equipment," Eng. Struct., vol. 162, p.213–225, 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.024

Google Scholar

[35] G. Quinci, H. N. Phan, and F. Paolacci, On the Use of Artificial Neural Network Technique for Seismic Fragility Analysis of a Three-Dimensional Industrial Frame. 2022.

DOI: 10.1115/PVP2022-83874

Google Scholar

[36] S. Hwang, S. Mangalathu, J. Shin, and J. Jeon, "Jo ur na l P re of," J. Build. Eng., p.101905, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101905

Google Scholar

[37] S. Bhatta and J. Dang, "Seismic damage prediction of RC buildings using machine learning," no. September 2022, p.3504–3527, 2023.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3907

Google Scholar

[38] M. Noureldin, T. Ali, and J. Kim, "Machine learning-based seismic assessment of framed structures with soil-structure interaction," vol. 17, no. 2, p.205–223, 2023.

DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0909-y

Google Scholar

[39] D. Asta, "University of Birmingham A machine learning-based analysis for predicting fragility curve parameters of buildings Fragility curves of buildings ; a critical review and a machine learning-based study," 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105367

Google Scholar

[40] M. Ludian, "Seismic vulnerability assessment model of civil structure using machine learning algorithms : a case study of the 2014," Nat. Hazards, vol. 120, no. 7, p.6481–6508, 2024.

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06465-9

Google Scholar

[41] E. Nazarian, T. Taylor, T. Weifeng, and F. Ansari, "Machine-learning-based approach for post event assessment of damage in a turn-of-the-century building structure," J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit., vol. 8, no. 2, p.237–251, 2018.

DOI: 10.1007/s13349-018-0275-6

Google Scholar

[42] J. Chen, H. Xiong, and C. E. Ventura, "Seismic reliability evaluation of a tall concrete-timber hybrid structural system," Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., vol. 31, no. 10, p. e1933, Jul. 2022.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1933

Google Scholar

[43] Z. Xin, D. Ke, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, and F. Liu, "Non-destructive evaluating the density and mechanical properties of ancient timber members based on machine learning approach," Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 341, p.127855, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127855

Google Scholar

[44] Y. Xinzhe, L. Liujun, Z. Haibin, Z. Yanping, C. Genda, and D. Cihan, "Machine Learning-Based Seismic Damage Assessment of Residential Buildings Considering Multiple Earthquake and Structure Uncertainties," Nat. Hazards Rev., vol. 24, no. 3, p.4023024, Aug. 2023.

DOI: 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1681

Google Scholar

[45] K. Chawgien and E. Junda, "Interpretable machine learning models for the estimation of seismic drifts in CLT buildings," vol. 70, no. December 2022, 2023.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106365

Google Scholar