Evaluating the Impact of Skybridge on the Analysis, Design, and BIM Integration of a Multi-Tower Structure: A Case Study in Laboratory Building Construction

Abstract:

A well-designed structure that goes through proper construction stages will reduce the risk of losses that may be apparent in construction work. Consequently, the development of BIM technology becomes a solution for achieving it through the ability of information integration that it offers. In this study, analysis and design of a multi-tower structure are conducted with BIM usage during the design process. The study is carried out by redesigning two structures that have been separately designed previously, namely Tower Laboratory and Hangar Laboratory, with a skybridge connecting them. The study is started by joining both structures without any changes in element sizes to compare the changes in the structural behavior consistently. The study is then continued by doing design evaluations on the connected structure with response spectrum and time history analyses. BIM integration is then used to obtain concrete and bar volumes necessary for cost calculations. The results show that two separate structures will have changes in their dynamic behaviors when they are connected, which will affect their design especially in resisting lateral forces like earthquake load. Conclusively, a maximum change of 27,96% for Tower Laboratory and 31.77% for Hangar Laboratory was found when the two structures are subjected to Kocaeli ground motion with skybridge connecting them. Efficiency of total structural cost by 2.2047% was achieved for Tower Laboratory and 0.5523% for Hangar Laboratory with the use of time history analysis. Further, this study shows the potential of BIM in helping structural designs process despite its imperfections and further developments needed.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 19)
• Pages: 123-140
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-eP5v2D
• Online since: June 2025
• Authors: Jessica Sjah*, Michael Loreantz Steven Tambunan, Ayomi Dita Rarasati
• Keywords: Building Information Modelling, Cost, Multi-Tower, Skybridge, Time-History Analysis

References

[1] G.H. Powell, Modeling for Structural Analysis Behavior and Basics, Computers and Structures, Berkeley, 2010.

[2] A. Wood, Pavements in the sky: the skybridge in tall buildings, Arq 7 (2003) 325–332.

DOI: 10.1017/S1359135503002264

[3] R. Doroudi, S.H. Hosseini Lavassani, Connection of coupled buildings: A state-of-the-art review, Structures 33 (2021) 1299–1326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.017

[4] M. Krynski, D. Wittenberg, D. DeLong, Eaton's Center: Design of a Pedestrian Glass Sky Bridge, in: Structures Congress 2012, American Society of Civil Engineers, Chicago, 2012, p.438–447.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784412367.039

[5] S. Mahmoud, Horizontally connected high-rise buildings under earthquake loadings, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 10 (2019) 227–241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2018.12.007

[6] I.S. Abbood, M. Mahmod, A.N. Hanoon, M.S. Jaafar, M.H. Mussa, Seismic Response Analysis of Linked Twin Tall Buildings with Structural Coupling, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 9 (2018) 208–219.

[7] S.A. Hussain, M.A. Azeem, A. Minhajuddin, Effect on Seismic Behaviour of Structurally connected Tall Buildings, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 12 (2022) 143–151.

[8] Z. Jiang, A. Meier, J. Porretta, S. Belini, J. Caicedo, J. Wong, D. Shook, R. Henoch, J. Zhang, Improving Performance of Connected High-Rise Structures Through The Use of Skybridges, 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2020).

[9] J. Lim, B. Bienkiewicz, Effects of Structural and Aerodynamic Couplings on the Dynamic Response of Tall Twin Buildings with a Skybridge, in: Structures Congress 2009, American Society of Civil Engineers, Austin, Texas, United States, 2009, p.1–9.

DOI: 10.1061/41031(341)77

[10] J.A. Alomari, Conceptual Seismic Analysis of Two R.C. Adjacent Buildings with Different Dynamic Properties Connected Horizontally by Sky Bridges, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 16 (2021) 2610–2628.

[11] Y. Zhou, X. Lu, W. Lu, J. Qian, Study on the seismic performance of a multi-tower connected structure, Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build. 20 (2011) 387–401.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.533

[12] J.K. Wight, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Seventh edition, Pearson, Hoboken, 2016.

[13] A.K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Fifth edition, Pearson, Hoboken, 2017.

[14] F. Naeim, ed., The Seismic Design Handbook, Springer US, Boston, 2001.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1693-4

[15] J. Hancock, J. Watson-Lamprey, N.A. Abrahamson, J.J. Bommer, A. Markatis, E. McCoy, R. Mendis, An Improved Method of Matching Response Spectra of Recorded Earthquake Ground Motion Using Wavelets, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2006) 67–89.

DOI: 10.1080/13632460609350629

[16] C. Tura, K. Orakçal, Earthquake Response Analysis of Multiple Towers on a Common Podium: A Representative Case Study, Teknik Dergi (2019).

DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.467371

[17] K.T. Tse, J. Song, Modal Properties of Twin Buildings with Structural Coupling at Various Locations, in: Proceedings of the Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Research Publishing Services, 2013, p.862–869.

DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-8012-8_175

[18] J.S. Przemieniecki, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1968.

[19] I. Grytting, F. Svalestuen, J. Lohne, H. Sommerseth, S. Augdal, O. Lædre, Use of LoD Decision Plan in BIM-projects, Procedia Engineering 196 (2017) 407–414.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.217

[20] A.S. Hadi, A.M. Abd, M. Mahmood, Integrity of Revit with structural analysis softwares, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1076 (2021) 012119.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012119

[21] A.Z. Sampaio, A.M. Gomes, BIM Interoperability Analyses in Structure Design, CivilEng 2 (2021) 174–192.

DOI: 10.3390/civileng2010010

[22] Z. Xu, X. Lu, X. Zeng, Y. Xu, Y. Li, Seismic loss assessment for buildings with various-LOD BIM data, Advanced Engineering Informatics 39 (2019) 112–126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2018.12.003

[23] S. Fai, J. Rafeiro, Establishing an Appropriate Level of Detail (LoD) for a Building Information Model (BIM) – West Block, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Canada, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. II–5 (2014) 123–130.

DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-123-2014

[24] J.P. Moehle, J.D. Hooper, T.R. Meyer, Seismic Design of Cast-In-Place Concrete Diaphragms, Chords, And Collectors: A Guide for Practicing Engineers, Second Edition, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 2016.

DOI: 10.6028/NIST.GCR.16-917-42

[25] T. Brown, A. Elshaer, Pounding of structures at proximity: A state-of-the-art review, Journal of Building Engineering 48 (2022) 103991.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103991

[26] J.P. Moehle, J.D. Hooper, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Special Moment Frames: A Guide for Practicing Engineers, Second Edition, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gathersburg, 2016.

DOI: 10.6028/NIST.GCR.16-917-40