Design Criteria for Designing Sustainable Commercial Buildings in Hot and Arid Climate

Article Preview

Abstract:

As climate change effect on our daily life is clear, and the awareness of greenhouse gases damages is increased, architects and many developers necessitate green and sustainable buildings design by focusing on energy efficiency, avoiding harmful materials, and taking care of indoor air quality to construct environmentally friend buildings. Also, adopting energy efficiency strategies and renewable energy applications in buildings design generally and particularly in commercial buildings will drop the produced amount of CO2 emissions, as well as operational emissions and embodied emissions are attributed to the building materials and energy required for construction.This research is proposing energy efficient commercial building design proposal as an approach to green architecture in Egypt. First, commercial buildings impact is studied, then choosing energy simulation tool to assess the solution as DesignBuilder software, the design of commercial building proposal respect the triple bottom line of sustainability, to introduce innovative, efficient and environmental building design respecting users’ needs and achieve high economic value, finally, after simulating the building model in DesignBuilder to reach the highest energy saving and ensure the thermal comfort for users, the design is evaluated by LEED criteria to measure the environmental impact of the building and indicate how this design is successful or not.Finally, this research focuses on proposing a design design cliteria and apply it on designing new commercial buildings to enhance the building performance and being environmentally integrated based on design design cliteria that represent the three major design principles and they are Nature, Culture and Art. Nature for respecting and integrating with the environment, Culture for respecting the location and user’s needs, Art for offering a unique architecture design leave strong mental image impression.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

15-23

Citation:

Online since:

June 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Simonen, K. e.. Benchmarking the Embodied Carbon of Buildings.". Technology|Architecture Design, (2017) 208–218.

DOI: 10.1080/24751448.2017.1354623

Google Scholar

[2] Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan.. Commercial Buildings Factsheet. Michigan: Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, (September 2021) Pub. No. CSS05-05.

Google Scholar

[3] Kneifel, J.. Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measure in new commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42, (2010) 333-340.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.09.011

Google Scholar

[4] David Sundfors, M. B.. Sustainability metrics for commercial buildings in Sweden. Property Management. (July 2018)

Google Scholar

[5] USGBC. Retrieved from www.usgbc.org: https://www.usgbc.org/leed, last access (2022, august 7th ).

Google Scholar

[6] Karmany, H. M.. Evaluation of green building rating systems for Egypt. American University in Cairo. (2016)

Google Scholar

[7] EIA, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) . Buildings Energy Data Book. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) . (Monthly Energy Review April 2021).

DOI: 10.2172/1216557

Google Scholar

[8] Ahmed Osama Daoud, A. A. Overcoming the limitations of the green pyramid rating system in the Egyptian construction industry: a critical analysis. Architectural Engineering and Design Manage. ( August 2020).

DOI: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1802218

Google Scholar

[9] U.S. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2021. U.S. EIA . (2022)

Google Scholar

[10] Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Commercial Buildings Factsheet, september2021, Pub No. CSS05-05

Google Scholar

[11] Altan, Haşim & Hajibandeh, Mona & Tabet Aoul, K. & Deep, Akash. (2016). Passive Design.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_8

Google Scholar

[12] https://www.usgbc.org/about/mission-vision , last access (2023, January 19th).

Google Scholar

[13] Rania Rushdy Moussa, The reasons for not implementing Green Pyramid Rating System in Egyptian buildings, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, (2019), 917-927

DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.003

Google Scholar

[14] Khaled Tarabieh, M. A. Teaching energy simulation in the architectural design studio: An experimental approach. Engineering of Science and Military Technologies, Volume (2)( Issue (2)). (2018). 1036.1043

Google Scholar

[15] designbuilder. designbuilder. Retrieved from designbuilder.co.uk/: https://designbuilder.co.uk/software/for-architects, last access (2022, November 22nd).

DOI: 10.1201/9781315368894-8

Google Scholar