Comparison of Functional Properties of Thin Layers on Titanium and Cobalt Implant Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The development of arthroplastics places high demands on the materials used for load-bearing elements of orthopedic implants. The most common of implant materials are titanium and cobalt alloys due to their excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Titanium alloys have desirable properties, such as relatively low modulus, good fatigue strength, formability, machinability, superior corrosion resistance and so are frequently used for long-term implants. However, poor wear resistance limits their application for tribological systems of artificial joints. Research on improvement of titanium alloys tribological properties have been undertaken, mainly by using thin coatings. The TiN-layers are reported to be most promising in biomedical applications such. Many authors stress that application of TiN layer improve wear resistance of titanium implant alloys. Presented work is focused on comparison of effect of TiN coating on properties of TiAlV and CoCrMo implant alloys. The structure, microhardness, corrosion resistance as well as tribological properties were analysed. The research did not confirmed the good properties of titanium alloy with TiN coating. The results show that matrix metal hardness definitely affects the efficiency of TiN layers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 297-301)

Pages:

1053-1058

Citation:

Online since:

April 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Burny, M. Donkerwolcke, D. Muster: Materials Science and Engineering A 199 (1995), p.53.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Long M., H.J. Rack: Biomaterials Vol. 19 (1998), p.1621.

Google Scholar

[3] J.I. Oñate, F. Alonso, A. Garcia: Thin Solid Films 317 (1998), p.471.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Alonso, A. Arizaga, S. Quainton, J.J. Ugarte, J.L. Viviente, J.I. Oñate: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 74-75 (1995), p.986.

DOI: 10.1016/0257-8972(95)08291-3

Google Scholar

[5] W. Feng, D. Yan, J. He, X. Li, Y. Dong: Wear Vol. 258 (2005), p.806.

Google Scholar

[6] C. Liu, Q. Bi, A. Matthews: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 163-164 (2003), p.597.

Google Scholar

[7] H. -H. Huang, C. -H. Hsu, S. -H. Pan, J. -L. He, C. -C. Chen, T. -L. Lee: Applied Surface ScienceVol. 244 (2005), p.252.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Shenhar, I. Gotman, S. Radin, P. Ducheyne, E.Y. Gutmanas: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 126 (2000), p.210.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(00)00524-7

Google Scholar

[9] M. Grądzka-Dahlke: Journal of Vibroengineering Vol. 8 (2006), p.24.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Grądzka-Dahlke, A. Bukrym, E. Choińska: Solid State Phenomena Vol. 147-149 (2009), p.782.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.147-149.782

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Werner, M. Barlak, M. Grądzka-Dahlke, R. Diduszko, W. Szymczyk, J. Dąbrowski, J. Piekoszewski, K. Borkowska: Vacuum Vol. 81 (2007), p.1191.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2007.01.014

Google Scholar

[12] M.T. Rimondi, R. Pietrabissa: Biomaterials Vol. 21 (2000), p.907.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Grądzka-Dahlke: Surface engineering - conference materials, Brest (2007), p.16.

Google Scholar