Parametric Analysis of the Classification of Harrison Kinetics Regimes in Grain Boundary Diffusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Recently, the transition point between the Harrison Type-A and Type-B kinetics regimes as well as the emerging intermediate AB transition regime have been analysed in detail by making use of Lattice Monte Carlo (LMC) simulations of tracer depth concentration profiles as a function of diffusion time and distance between grain boundaries e.g. [1-3]. In the present study, we analyse Harrison Type-B to Type-C kinetics regimes in the transient grain boundary diffusion problem using the parallel slabs model and LMC numerical simulation. The transition point where the Harrison Type-B kinetics regime last occurs (transition point between the Harrison Type-B kinetics and the Type-BC kinetics) is estimated at  (= 0.5δ(Dlt)-1/2) = 0.1. The Harrison Type-C grain boundary diffusion kinetics regime is also analysed using LMC simulated concentration depth profiles. The transition point where the Harrison Type-C kinetics regime first occurs (transition point between the Type-BC kinetics and the Harrison Type-C kinetics) is estimated at  = 5.0. Therefore an intermediate Type-BC regime can be expected to occur between 0.1 <  < 5.0. Preliminary results for the cubic grain model show that the interval for the intermediate Type-BC regime is somewhat narrower for this model and occurs at 0.5 <  < 5.0.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 297-301)

Pages:

1226-1231

Citation:

Online since:

April 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I.V. Belova and G.E. Murch: Phil. Mag. Vol. 81 (2001), p.2447.

Google Scholar

[2] S.V. Divinski, F. Hisker, Y. -S. Kang, J. -S. Lee and Chr. Herzig.: Zeit. Metallk. Vol. 93 (2002), p.256.

Google Scholar

[3] I.V. Belova and G.E. Murch: Phil. Mag. Vol. 89 (2009), p.665.

Google Scholar

[4] L.G. Harrison: Trans. Farad. Soc. Vol. 57 (1961), p.1191.

Google Scholar

[5] E.W. Hart: Acta Metall. Vol. 5 (1957), p.597.

Google Scholar

[6] J.C. Maxwell-Garnett: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Vol. 203 (1904), p.386.

Google Scholar

[7] J.C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Elasticity and Magnetism, 3rd Ed. Clarendon Press, 1892, p.435.

Google Scholar

[8] I.V. Belova and G.E. Murch: J. Metastable Nanocryst. Matls. Vol. 19 (2004), p.25.

Google Scholar

[9] I. Kaur, Y. Mishin and W. Gust, Fundamentals of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion (Wiley, Chichester 1995).

Google Scholar

[10] S.V. Divinski, and L.N. Larikov: Defect and Diffusion Forum Vol. 143-147 (1997), p.1469.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.143-147.1469

Google Scholar

[11] I.V. Belova and G.E. Murch: Defect and Diffusion Forum. Vol 273-276 (2008), p.425.

Google Scholar

[12] I.V. Belova, G.E. Murch, T. Fiedler and A. Öchsner: Diffusion Fundamentals Vol. 4 (2007), p.15. 1 (electronically published).

Google Scholar

[13] T. Suzuoka : J. Phys. Soc. Japan Vol. 19 (1964), p.839.

Google Scholar

[14] R.T.P. Whipple: Phil. Mag. Vol. 45 (1954), p.1225.

Google Scholar

[15] A.D. Le Claire: Brit. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 14 (1963) p.351.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Levine and C.J. MacCallum: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 31 (1960), p.595.

Google Scholar