Optimization of a Thermoelectric Air Conditioning Systems

Abstract:

This paper studies the optimization of a thermoelectric cooling system of air. Based on both results obtained experimentally and from a mathematical model, we evaluated the available features of thermoelectric modules and parameters subject to optimization. In the thermoelectric cooling air process based on the effect discovered by Jean Peltier Charles Athanase in 1834, when an electrical current is conducted through a semiconductor junction between two materials with different properties, heat is absorbed and dissipated. Thermoelectric modules are made of semiconductor materials and sealed between two plates. According to the shape of the plate, the current flow cools the one hand and the other is heated. The most important parameters to evaluate the efficiency of the thermoelectric cooling is the coefficient of performance, the rate of heat transfer and temperature difference between the maximum possible to the cold and hot sides of the thermoelectric module. In this evaluation were used thermoelectric modules and heat sinks, commercially available temperature sensors and a software for obtaining, storing and comparing the data. The prototype auxiliary allows the surface temperatures of thermoelectric modules of the hot and cold sides, the air inlet and outlet temperatures of the heat sink sides of the hot and cold air flow, the voltage and the electrical current to be applied to the modules. A simulation is performed using two air flows at a speed controlled for the hot and cold sides of the module and a set of tests for various modules, i.e. one, two, three and four coupled in parallel. Using this system, the performance data is analyzed making it possible to check the power, voltage and electrical current to maximize the coefficient of performance of the system.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 336)
• Pages: 111-120
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.336.111
• Online since: March 2013
• Authors: Jamir Machado da Silva, Renan Eduardo da Silva, José Rui Camargo, Ederaldo Godoy Junior
• Keywords: Air-Conditioning, Peltier Effect, Thermoelectric Cooling, Thermoelectric Module

References

[1] J. M. Gordon and K. Choon: Predictive and diagnostic aspects of a universal thermodynamic model for chillers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 1995; 38 (5): 807-818.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(94)00208-d

[2] S. Göktun: Design considerations for a thermoelectric refrigerator. Energy Conversion and Management 1995; 36 (12): 1197-1200.

DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00005-x

[3] H. Sofrata: Heat rejection alternatives for thermoelectric refrigerators. Energy Conversion and Management 1996 37 (3): 269-280.

DOI: 10.1016/0196-8904(95)00189-1

[4] M. Bojic, G. Savanovic, N. Trifunovic, L. Radovic and D. Saljic: Thermoelectric cooling of a train carriage by using a coldness-recovery device. Energy 1997; 22 (5): 493-500.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-5442(96)00150-8

[5] K.W. Lindler: Use of multi-stage cascades to improve performance of thermoelectric heat pumps. Energy Conversion and Management 1998; 39 (10): 1009-1014.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(97)10044-9

[6] B.J. Huang and C.L. Duang: System dynamic model and temperature control of a thermoelectric cooler. International Journal of Refrigeration 2000; 23:197-207.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-7007(99)00045-6

[7] B.J. Huang, C.J. Chin and C.L. Duang: A design method of thermoelectric cooler. International Journal of Refrigeration 2000; 23: 208-218.

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-7007(99)00046-8

[8] N.F. Güler and R. Ahiska: Design and testing of a microprocessor-controlled portable thermoelectric medical cooling kit. Applied Thermal Engineering 2002; 22: 1271-1276.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(02)00039-x

[9] J. Chen, Y. Zhou, H. Wang and J.T. Wang: Comparison of the optimal performance of single- and two-stage thermoelectric refrigeration systems. Applied Energy 2002; 73: 285-298.

DOI: 10.1016/s0306-2619(02)00120-4

[10] J. Luo, L. Chen, F. Sun and C. Wu: Optimum allocation of heat transfer surface area for cooling load and coefficient of performance optimization of a thermoelectric refrigerator. Energy Conversion and Management 2003; 44: 3197-3206.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(03)00107-9

[11] Y.J. Dai, R.Z. Wang and L. Ni: Experimental investigation on a thermoelectric refrigerator driven by solar cells. Renewable Energy 2003; 28: 949-959.

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-1481(02)00055-1

[12] D. Astrain, J. G. Vián and M. Domínguez: Increase of coefficient of performance in the thermoelectric refrigeration by the optimization of heat dissipation. Applied Thermal Engineering 2003; 23: 2183-2200.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(03)00202-3

[13] R. Chein and G. Huang: Thermoelectric cooler application in electronic cooling. Applied Thermal Engineering 2004; 24: 2207-2217.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.03.001

[14] K. Hansen: Thermal performance of a 61-cell Si-drift detector module with thermoelectric cooler. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 2004; A 517: 254-263.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.09.067

[15] Y. Cheng and W. Lin: Geometric optimization of thermoelectric coolers in a confined volume using genetic algorithms. Applied Thermal Engineering 2005; 25: 2983-2997.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.007

[16] L.L. Vasiliev: Micro and miniature heat pipes – Electronic component coolers. Applied Thermal Engineering, article in press.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.02.023

[17] S.B. Riffat and X. Ma: Thermoelectrics: a review of present and potential applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 2003; 23: 913-935.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(03)00012-7

[18] R.R. Heikees, R.W. Ure Jr.: Thermoelectricity. New York: Science and Engineering Interscience Publisher's, 1961.

[19] Melcor Thermoelectric Design/Selection Guide. See: http://www.melcor.com.

[20] ISO 5725-1:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. General Principles and Definitions. Part 1.

DOI: 10.3403/30329298

[21] ISO 5725-2:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of Measurement Methods and Results. Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reprodutibility of a Standard Measurement Method. Part 2.

DOI: 10.3403/30329301