Effect of Atomic Complexes Formation in Grain Boundaries on Grain Boundary Diffusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

The peculiarities of grain boundary diffusion in Cu connected with the effect of atomic pairs formation in grain boundaries (GB) were studied using the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. In present study Cu GB selfdiffusion was simulated with the use of semi-empirical potential. Besides, the ‘heterodiffusion’ simulation was performed with the artificially addеd energy of interaction (E) between identical atoms in arbitrary chosen pairs. To obtain reliable data on the mean square displacements (MSD) the simulation cell, consisted about three hundreds thousands atoms and two symmetrical GBs Σ5 (001)(012), was used. 70 pairs of identical Cu atoms in GBs, bonded into pairs, were chosen as initial state. Energy of interaction was varied between 0 and - 0.5eV/atomThe results obtained for selfdiffusion are in a good agreement with experimental results and other results of computer simulation. Two main effects for heterodiffusion are under discussion. The first is atomic exchange between GB zone and adjacent lattice zone, where the mobility of the atoms decreases significantly. As a result, the MSD decrease. Another effect is connected with attraction between the “marked” atoms, which leads to formation of relatively stable complexes and the MSD also decreases. The results obtained involve also dependence the number of the stable pairs on time and temperature and show the possibility of pairs to condense into ternary, quarterly and more numerous complexes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

103-111

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.S. Bokstein, A.O. Rodin, Grain Boundary Diffusion and Grain Boundary Segregation in Metals and Alloys. Diffusion Foundations. Diffusion in Advanced Materials 1 (2014) 99 – 124.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/df.1.99

Google Scholar

[2] B.S. Bokstein, V.A. Esin, A.O. Rodin, New model of grain boundary segregation with formation atomic complexes in grain boundary, Phys. Met. Metallography 109 (2010) 316.

DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x10040022

Google Scholar

[3] V.A. Esin, B.S. Bokstein, Effect of atomic interaction on grain boundary diffusion in B- regime, Acta. Mat. 60 (2012) 5109-16.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.011

Google Scholar

[4] V.A. Esin, B.S. Bokstein, A.O. Rodin, Concentration Profiles for Grain Boundary Diffusion in B-regime with regard to the formation of atomic complexes in grain boundary. Def. and Dif. Forum 309-310 (2011) 29-38.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.309-310.29

Google Scholar

[5] S. Bokstein, A.O. Rodin, A.N. Smirnov, Connection between Fe grain boundary diffusion in Al and phase formation in the bulk, Zt. fur Metkunde 10 (2004) 953-956.

DOI: 10.1515/ijmr-2004-0174

Google Scholar

[6] M. Guttmann, Grain-boundary segregation, 2 dimensional compound formation, and precipitation Met. Trans. 8A (1977) 1383.

Google Scholar

[7] M.I. Mendelev, A.O. Rodin, B.S. Bokstein, Computer simulation of diffusion in dilute Al-Fe alloys. Def. Dif. Forum, 309-310 (2011) 223-230.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.309-310.223

Google Scholar

[8] D. S. Prokoshkina, A.O. Rodin, V.A. Esin, About Fe Diffusion in Cu, Def. and Dif. Forum 323-325 (2012) 171.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.323-325.171

Google Scholar

[9] A.A. Itckovich, B.S. Bokstein, A.O. Rodin, Bulk and grain boundary diffusion of Co in Cu. Mat. Letters 135C (2014) 241-245.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.140

Google Scholar

[10] A.O. Rodin,N. Dolgopolov, A. Simanov, Cu diffusion along al grain boundaries, polish journal of chemistry 83 (2009) 1507-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.07.059

Google Scholar

[11] M.I. Mendelev, M.J. Kramer, C.A. Becker, Analysis of semi-empirical interatomic potentials appropriate for simulation of crystalline and liquid Al and Cu, M. Asta, Phil. Mag. 88 (2008) 1723.

DOI: 10.1080/14786430802206482

Google Scholar

[12] M.I. Mendelev, A.H. King, The interactions of self-interstitials with twin boundaries, Phil. Mag. 93 (2013) 1268-1278.

DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2012.747012

Google Scholar

[13] Yu. Mishin, M. Asta, M. Ju Li, Atomistic modeling of interfaces and their impact on microstructure and properties Acta Mat. 58 (2010) 1117-1151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.049

Google Scholar

[14] A. Suzuki, Yu. Mishin, Atomic mechanisms of grain boundary diffusion: low versus high temperatures J. Mater. Sci. 40 (2005) 3155-3161.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-005-2678-0

Google Scholar

[15] Surholt T, Herzig Chr. Grain boundary self-diffusion in Cu polycrystals of different purity Acta Mater 1997; 45: 3817.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(97)00037-2

Google Scholar

[16] J. Ribbe, G. Schmidt, S.V. Divinski, Grain boundary diffusion of Fe in high-purity copper, Def. Dif. Forum 289-292 (2009) 211-217.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ddf.289-292.211

Google Scholar

[17] D. Prokochkina, V. Esin, S. Divinski DOI: 10. 1016/J/acta_mat. 2017. 05. 024 Acta Mat. 133(2017) 240-246.

Google Scholar

[18] D. Gaertner, G. Wilde. S.V. Divinski, Grain boundary diffusion and segregation of Co-57 in high-purity copper: radiotracer measurements in B- and C-type diffusion regimes, Acta Mat. 127 (2017) 407-415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.045

Google Scholar