Permeation Data Analysis Considering a Nonzero Hydrogen Concentration on the Low Pressure Detector Side for a Purged Permeation Experiment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently available diffusion constant and Sieverts constant experimental results are based on time dependent permeation experiments. The common principle is an analysis which is expecting that the permeating hydrogen is “transported” from the retentate chamber to the permeate chamber through the connecting membrane, with a vanishing hydrogen partial pressure on the permeate side. But reality shows a different behaviour caused by the fact that a nonzero hydrogen partial pressure in the permeate chamber is necessary for detection purposes. This nonzero pressure is mostly not considered by analysis. This issue is solved (approximatively) numerically by the procedure as described in this paper. This work is rooted in the field of fusion research, where so called purge gas with low partial pressure of tritium is contacting the structural materials (300-550°C) of the fusion reactor (blanket) and of process equipment, where the tritium losses are of interest. The developed algorithms are intended for the evaluation of an experiment termed “Q-PETE” (Q for any hydrogen isotope, PEermeation Transport Experiment), which abstracts the hydrogen transport conditions of the fusion blanket, and where the effect of nonzero hydrogen concentration on the permeate side is relevant. The algorithms are useful for all experiments, where the ratio of hydrogen pressures between retentate and peremeate side are far from infinite.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

18-29

Citation:

Online since:

February 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Federici et al., Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO, Fusion Engineering and Design 109-111 (2016) 1464-1474.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Carella et al., Tritium modelling in HCPB breeder blanket at a system level, Fus. Eng. Des. 1224 (2017) 687-691.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.01.051

Google Scholar

[3] A. Ciampichetti et al., Conceptual design of Tritium Extraction System for the European HCPB Test Blanket Module, Fus. Eng, Des. 87 (2012) 620–624.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.01.047

Google Scholar

[4] F. Hernandez et al., A new HCPB breeding blanket for the EU DEMO: Evolution rationale and preliminary performance, Fus. Eng. Des. 124(2017) 882-886.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.008

Google Scholar

[5] A. von der Weth et al., Review of Hydrogen Isotopes Transport Parameters and Considerations to corresponding Experiments, Fus. Eng. Des. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.2016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.024.

Google Scholar

[6] K.S. Forcey et al., Hydrogen Transport and Solubility in 316L and 1.4914 Steels for Fusion Reactor Applications, J. Nucl. Mat. 160 (1988) 117-124.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(88)90038-4

Google Scholar

[7] H. A. Daynes, The Process of Diffusion through a Rubber Membrane, Proc. Roy. Soc. (1920) A97, 286.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion, Clarendon Press, Oxford, (1975).

Google Scholar

[9] F. Arbeiter et al, Simulations and uncertainty analysis for a hydrogen diffusion experiment using a two side purged membrane, setup, Fus. Eng. Des. Article in press (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.02.010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.02.010

Google Scholar

[10] D Klimenko et al., Definition of the Q-PETE Experiment for Investigation of Hydrogen Isotopes Permeation through the Metal Structures of a DEMO HCPB Breeder Zone, Fus. Eng. Des. Article in press (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.03.024.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.03.024

Google Scholar

[11] A. von der Weth et al. Analysis for evaluation of hydrogen isotopes permeability parameters like Sieverts´ and diffusion constant from experimental results with a purged permeator setup under publication J. Nucl. Mat.

Google Scholar

[12] H. S. Careslaw, J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford 19592.

Google Scholar

[13] D. W. Marquardt, An Algorithm for least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. Vol 11, 2, (1963).

Google Scholar

[14] A. H. Land and A. G. Doig, An Automatic Method of Solving Discrete Programming Problems, Econometrica, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1960, pp.497-520.

DOI: 10.2307/1910129

Google Scholar

[15] H. R. Schwarz, Numerische Mathematik, Stuttgart (1993).

Google Scholar

[16] https://www.bwhpcc5.de/wiki/index.php/bwUniCluster.

Google Scholar

[17] A. von der Weth, Technical note on Hydrogen permeation parameter in RAFM steel, Karlsruhe 2016, Eurofus. IDM D2MYS5400C, March (2016).

Google Scholar