Analysis and Evaluating of Flexible Ankle Foot Orthosis for Drop Foot Deformity

Abstract:

This work involved two major parts: the first Part is the experimental part included manufacturing ankle foot orthotics, measure the (the reaction force of the ground, pressure distribution) for both normal (healthy) and sound side (intake) legs in two case, the first measurement when the patient walking without orthosis while the second test when the patient dressed up the flexible (AFO). The pressure generated between leg and calf part is measured by F-Socket devise. The experimental part also consist test the mechanical properties of a suggestion composite material. The second Part is the (FEM) finite element analysis for numerical simulation part during which the stresses are calculated using ANSYS 14.5 software. Experimental work was done on a case study suffering from low level spinal cord trauma he has good control of the trunk muscles but the muscle weakness and nerve damage for right leg. The patient with age, weight of 30years, 75kg, respectively. The Results show the parameters of test for both legs (left and right) in two cases. The results show that the data of the gait cycle in the case of the patient wearing the brace is more acceptable and we notice improvement in the performance of walking steps and reduce the difference between the infected leg and natural and this indicates the good evaluation of this orthosis. Max pressure obtained is 1.53*10^5MPa from F .Socket at calf region .Max stress Calculated at Posterior ankle joint because it is flexible Position The equivalent Von-Mises stress and the safety factor for fatigue of the composite material gave good results this led to the longer life design.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 398)
• Pages: 41-47
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.398.41
• Online since: January 2020
• Authors: Fahad Mohanad Kadhim*, Marfa Salah Hayal
• Keywords: Ankle, ANSYS, Foot, F-Socket, Gait Cycle, Orthosis

References

[1] Stewart JD. Foot drop: where, why and what to do? Pract Neurol. (2008) vol.8:pp.158-169.

[2] Michael J., Lower limb orthoses. In: Hsu J, Michael J, Fisk J, eds. AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices,, Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, (2008)343-355.

[3] Pansiera, Hinge system for an orthopedic brace,, Unites States Patent, USA, July, (1998).

[4] Michael J.W., Lower limb orthoses", in A AOS Atlas of orthosis and Assistive Devices,, Philadelphia, (2008) 343-355.

[5] Lehmann J.F., Esslman P.C., Ko M.J. , Smith J.C. , delateur B.J. , Dralle A.J. , Plastic Ankle-foot orthosis; evaluation of function,, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil, Sep, (1983) 402-7.

[6] Kottnik, A.I., H.J. Hermens, A.V. Nene, A Randomized Controlled Trial af an Inplantable two Channel Peroneal Nerve Stimulator on Walking Speed and Activity in Poststroke Hemiplegia,, Archives of Physical and Medicine Rehabilitation, (2007),vol. 88, pp.971-978.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.002

[7] Wade, D.T., Wood, V.A., Heller, A., Maggs, J. & Hewer, R.L. Walking after stroke measurement and recovery over the first 3 months,. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation and Medicine, (1987),vol. 19, 25-30.

[8] Fahad .M.Kadhim ,Ayad .M.Takhakh and Jumaa.S.chiad,Vibration Measurment and analysis of knee Ankle foot orthosis for both metal and plastic KAFO type,,ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and exposition, USA ,(2013).

DOI: 10.1115/imece2013-64641

[9] Kadhim K. Resan, Akeel Zeki, Design and Analysis of Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO) for Paraplegia Person,,Eng. & Tech. Journal, Vol.31, No.8, (2013).

[10] American Society for Testing and Materials International Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, D 638, (2000).

[11] Alternating Bending Fatigue Machine Instruction Manual HSM20.

[12] Brett A. Miller, Failure Analysis and Prevention, Fatigue Failures,, ASM International Handbook. Vol. 11, 2002, P 1470.