Evaluation of Cyclic Tensile Stress Effect in Boiler Tube Failure

Abstract:

Boiler is one of the critical parts and plays an important role in Steam Generation Power Plant. It transforms the chemical energy of fuel into heat or thermal energy. During plant operations, some problems occurred in the boiler and Superheater leakage is the heaviest problem that interfered the whole operations, and the units needed to stopped for maintenaces outages. Failure analysis is necessary to determine the cause of failure. Root Caused Failure Analysis methods was through mechanical tests in the laboratory, which is Visual Observation included Macrofractography Structure examination, Metallographic or Microstructure Examination, Hardness Test. The metallographic examination result shows that the microstructure of the base metal is ferrite pearlite, and there is no indication of microstructure changes in tube as effect from high operation temperature. Likewise, microstructure in the weld region is in normal conditions, no weld failure phenomenon. Hardness value for base metal, weld and HAZ area are still in a good condition. Macrofractrography structure examination shows that the fracture is in mechanical fatigue condition. Based on those results the source of the tube leak is not caused by operating errors, inside or outside deposit nor weld failure. Superheater tube failures caused by mechanical factors, namely due to cyclic tensile stress as result in vibration by gas flow coupled with an increase in the local area due to the welding heat, therefore, increases the rate of crack propagation. To verified the data from mechanical test, CFD simulation will be used. CFD can detect the direction of the gas flow around the Superheater tube. The simulation result shows the possibility of turbulence flow around the tube, which creates the vibrations on the tube due to gas flow velocity. Thus, the superheater tube leakage mostly because vibration that create cyclic tensile stress.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 415)
• Pages: 115-120
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-5wf01v
• Online since: April 2022
• Authors: Ariyana Dwiputra Nugraha*
• Keywords: Boiler, CFD, Superheater Failure

References

[1] William Liu. A superheater creep-fatigue interaction failure and its stress assessment. Engineering Failure Analysis 119 (2021) 105004.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105004

[2] Babak Haghighat-Shishavan, Hossein Firouzi-Nerbin, Masoud Nazarian-Samani, Pooria Ashtari, Farzad Nasirpouri. Failure analysis of a superheater tube ruptured in a power plant boiler: Main causes and preventive strategies. Engineering Failure Analysis 98 (2019) 131–140.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.016

[3] F. Dehnavi, A. Eslami, F. Ashrafizadeh. A case study on failure of superheater tubes in an industrial power Plant. Engineering Failure Analysis (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.007

[4] H. Roy, D. Ghosh, P. Roy, A. Saha, A.K. Shukla, J. Basu, Failure investigation of Platen Superheater Outlet Header, International Journal for Manufacturing Science & Production.

DOI: 10.1515/ijmsp.2009.10.1.17

[5] Helmut Thielsch, P.E, Robert Smoske, Florence Cone, Jason Husband, Failure Analysis and Repair Welding of Superheater Outlet Header Subject to Thermal Fatigue Cracking, AREGC, June 13-16, (1999).

DOI: 10.31399/asm.fach.power.c9001526

[6] John David Anderson, Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. McGraw Hill, (1995).

[7] P. Wesseling. Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York. (2001).

[8] Joel H. Ferziger and Milovan Peric, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer Verlag. 1999, ch 10.

[9] Culbert B. Laney. Computational Gasdynamics, Cambridge University Press, Springer Verlag, (1998).