Direct Regeneration of NMC622 Cathode Material from Spent Ev Li-Ion Batteries via Hydrothermal Relithiation

Charles Flores; Rinlee Butch M. Cervera

doi:10.4028/p-DPrWl4

Paper Titles

Low-Temperature Fabrication of Screen-Printed NiO-YSZ Thin Film Anodic Layer on Metal Substrate via Hot-Pressing for Metal-Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
p.41

Preparation of Electrospun Styrofoam Membranes for Hydrogen Fuel Cells
p.47

Development and Characterization of Paraffin Wax Based Phase Change Material with Blacksmith Slag Snag
p.57

Solid-State Synthesis and Characterization of LiNi_0.75Co_0.20Al_0.05O₂ Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Battery Applications
p.63

Direct Regeneration of NMC622 Cathode Material from Spent Ev Li-Ion Batteries via Hydrothermal Relithiation
p.69

Optimum Case Temperature for Appropriate Thermal Resistance to Obtain Minimum Junction Temperature in GaN-On-SiC Power Amplifiers
p.77

Influence of Fuel Injection Timing and Hydrogen Enrichment on Waste Plastic Oil: Performance, Combustion, and Emissions Analysis
p.85

Influence of Shape and Bubble Diameter on Marangoni Convection in Gold Nanoparticles
p.91

Simulation of the Heat Transfer during the Casting Process by Mirror U-Net Models
p.97

HomeDefect and Diffusion ForumDefect and Diffusion Forum Vol. 433Direct Regeneration of NMC622 Cathode Material...

Direct Regeneration of NMC622 Cathode Material from Spent Ev Li-Ion Batteries via Hydrothermal Relithiation

Abstract:

With the increasing demand for electric vehicles, there is a need to address the issues associated with the increasing number of waste Li-ion batteries. In this study, a facile hydrothermal relithiation method, followed by post-annealing, was explored to repair the structure, morphology, and composition of spent NMC622. Based on the XRD pattern, the regenerated NMC622 annealed at 800°C can be indexed similarly with that of pristine NMC622 without any observable impurities. It also showed less agglomeration, with a narrower particle size distribution than the as-recovered spent NMC622. The results suggest that a desirable structure and morphology have been successfully obtained after regeneration. Notably, the results from ICP-OES and XRF analyses further indicate that the Li content of regenerated NMC622 increased from 6.99 to 7.20 wt%, a value close to the theoretical Li composition (7.16%).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

The 9th International Conference on Composite Materials and Material Engineering & The 14th International Conference on Advanced Materials Research

View Preview

Materials Physics and Heat and Mass Transfer in Engineering

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 433)

Pages:

69-73

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-DPrWl4

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2024

Authors:

Charles Flores, Rinlee Butch M. Cervera*

Keywords:

Direct Regeneration, Li-Ion Battery, Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide, Spent Battery

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] K. Jena, A. AlFantazi, and A. Mayyas: Energy Fues. Vol. 35 No. 22 (2021), p.18257

Google Scholar

[2] H. Gao, D. Tran, and Z. Chen: Curr. Opin. Electrochem. Vol. 31 (2022), p.100875

Google Scholar

[3] A. Pavlovskii, K. Pushnitsa, A. Kosenko, P. Novikov, and A. Popovich: Inorganics Vol. 10 No. 9 (2022), p.141

DOI: 10.3390/inorganics10090141

Google Scholar

[4] K. Turcheniuk, D. Bondarev, V. Singhal, and G. Yushin: Nature Vol. 559 (2018), p.467–470

DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05752-3

Google Scholar

[5] K. Richa, C. Babbitt, G. Gaustad, and X. Wang: Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Vol. 83 (2014), p.63–76

Google Scholar

[6] T. Or, S. Gourley, K. Kaliyappan, A. Yu, and Z. Chen: Carbon Energy Vol. 2 (2020), p.6–43

Google Scholar

[7] L. Gaines: One Earth Vol. 1 (2019), p.413–415

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Ji, E. Kpodzro, C. Jafvert, and F. Zhao: Clean Technol. Recycl. Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021), p.124–151

Google Scholar

[9] X. Yu, S. Yu, Z. Yang, H. Gao, P. Xu, G. Cai, S. Rose, C. Brooks, P. Liu, and Z. Chen: Energy Stor. Mater. Vol. 51 (2022), p.54–62

Google Scholar

[10] S. Sloop, L. Crandon, M. Allen, M. Lerner, H. Zhang, W. Sirisaksoontorn, L. Gaines, J. Kim, and M. Lee. Sustain. Mater. Technol. Vol. 22 (2019), e00113

DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00113

Google Scholar

[11] C. Garrido, R.B. Cervera: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 119 (2020), pp.38-42

Google Scholar

[12] C. Hanisch, T. Loellhoeffel, J. Diekmann, K.J. Markley, W. Haserieder, and A. Kwade: J. Cleaner Production Vol. 108 (2015), pp.301-311

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.026

Google Scholar

[13] S. Windisch-Kern, A. Holzer, L. Wiszniewski, H. Raupenstrauch: Metals Vol. 11 No. 11 (2021), p.1844

Google Scholar

[14] G. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Q. Meng, Y. Zhang, P. Dong, M. Zhang, and X. Yang: ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. Vol. 8 No. 49 (2020), p.18138–147

Google Scholar