Void Content Measurement of the 3D Printed PEEK Materials by X-Ray Micro Computed Tomography

Abstract:

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is revolutionizing the manufacturing industry as various AM technologies continue to mature and more AM-compatible materials are being developed. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is one of the promising materials at the forefront of this technological revolution as efforts to enhance its application as a 3D-printing material are continuously being pursued. In this study, the effect of printing parameters on the void content of 3D-printed PEEK was examined using a non-destructive method, X-ray micro computed tomography (X-ray micro-CT). Of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) parameters considered, higher nozzle temperature and printing speed were seen to promote an increase in void content while higher build plate temperature reduces it. Void content has a direct effect on the mechanical and other properties of the manufactured material and therefore provides a link between the printing parameters and the expected mechanical performance of these materials. This study also highlights the importance of choosing the right printing parameters to ensure the quality of the manufactured PEEK.

• Periodical: Diffusion Foundations and Materials Applications (Volume 31)
• Pages: 29-35
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-c00t77
• Online since: November 2022
• Authors: Carlo S. Emolaga*, Persia Ada N. De Yro, Shaun Angelo C. Aranez, Jocelyn P. Reyes, Brigida A. Visaya, Blessie A. Basilia, Araceli M. Monsada, Rigoberto Advincula
• Keywords: 3D Printing, PEEK, Void Content, X-Ray Computed Tomography

References

[1] M. Thiruchitrambalam, D. Bubesh Kumar, D. Shanmugam, and M. Jawaid, A review on PEEK composites – Manufacturing methods, properties and Applications,, Materials Today: Proceedings vol. 33, p.1085–1092, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.124

[2] D. Kumar, T. Rajmohan, and S. Venkatachalapathi, Wear Behavior of PEEK Matrix composites: A review,, Materials Today: Proceedings vol. 5, pp.14583-14589, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.03.049

[3] R . Wang, K.J. Cheng, R.C. Advincula, and Q. Chen, On the thermal processing and mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether ether ketone,, MRS Communications, 2019,.

DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2019.86

[4] S. Singh et al, 3D printing of polyether-ether-ketone for biomedical applications,, European Polymer Journal 114 234-248, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.02.035

[5] H. Spece, et al, 3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces,, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials vol. 109, 103850, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103850

[6] A. Le Duigou, G. Chabaud, R. Matsizaki and M. Castro, Tailoring the Mechanical properties of 3D-printed continuous flax/PLA biocomposites by controlling the slicing parameters,, Composites Part B, vol. 203, 108474, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108474

[7] P. Szymczyk-Ziolkowska, M.B. Labowska, J. Detyna, I. Michalak and P. Gruber, A Review of fabrication polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing techniques,, Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 40 624-638, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.015

[8] M.M. Prabhakar, A. K. Saravanan, A.H. Lenin, I.J. Leno, K. Mayandi, and P.S. Ramalingam, A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials,, Materials Today: Proceedings vol. 45, pp.6108-6114, (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.225

[9] B.S. Rupal, K.G. Mostafa, Y. Wang, A.J. Qureshi, A reverse CAD Approach for estimating Geometric and Mechanical Bahavior of FDM Printed Parts,, Precedia Manufacturing vol. 34 pp.535-544, (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.217

[10] S. Sommacal, A. Matschinski, K. Drechsler, and P. Compston, Characterization of void and fiber distribution in 3D printed carbon-fiber/PEEK using X-ray Computed tomography,, Composites Part A. vol. 149, 106487, (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106487

[11] M.R. Khosravani and T. Reinicke, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 39 75, (2020).

[12] A. Hernandez-Contreras et al (2020). Extended CT Void Analysis in FDM Additive Manufacturing Components. Materials, 13, 3831;.

DOI: 10.3390/ma13173831

[13] T. Jayaraghul et al, On the Use of X-ray Computed Tomography in Assessment of 3D-printed Components,, Materials Today: Proceedings vol. 44, pp.2963-2967, (2021).

[14] M. Rinaldi, et al, Additive layer manufacturing of poly (ether ether ketone) via FDM,, Composites Part B vol. 145, p.162–172, (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029

[15] Y. Zhao et al. Mechanical characterization of biocompatible PEEK by FDM,. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 56: 28–42, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.063

[16] Y. Wang et al. Mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated PEEK for biomedical applications depending on additive manufacturing parameters,. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 115:104250, (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104250

[17] P. Wang, et al (2019). Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 271: 62–74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.016