FEA of Stress Distribution for Second Molar Dental Crown

Nathi Ram Chauhan; Rishika Bhadani; Stuti Bansal; Suruchi Maurya; Aashika Aashika; Ravinder Kumar

doi:10.4028/p-Nx204D

Paper Titles

Study on the Tribological and Physiochemical Properties of Algae Oil as a Sustainable Green Lubricant
p.47

Tribological Analysis of a Prunus Armeniaca Biolubricant under Various Temperature Conditions and its Performance in the Field of Journal Bearing
p.53

Effect of Hybrid Nano-Additives on Performance of Biofuel in Diesel Engine
p.67

Determination of Minimum Energy Consumption of an Industrial Reverse Osmosis Desalination System
p.79

Energy and Exergy Analysis of Vapor Compression Refrigeration System with Integrated Mechanical Subcooling Using R134a, R450a, R513a, and R515a
p.89

Thermodynamic Analysis of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System with Dedicated Mechanical Sub-Cooling
p.103

Enhancement of Heat Transfer Performance of a Fin Tube Heat Exchanger Using Modified Delta Winglet Vortex Generator
p.117

FEA of Stress Distribution for Second Molar Dental Crown
p.131

Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Pandemic and its Devastating Effects on the Hospitality/Service Industry: Qualitative Data Analysis from Indian Viewpoint
p.139

HomeEngineering HeadwayEngineering Headway Vol. 26FEA of Stress Distribution for Second Molar Dental...

FEA of Stress Distribution for Second Molar Dental Crown

Abstract:

There is a growing demand in the dental implant sector which aims to recreate the exact function and appearance of natural teeth, including strength, textures, and seamless blending with nearby teeth. Therefore, choosing the best crown material is a vital and challenging decision. To address this challenge, current study employs a comprehensive approach using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) on a 3-D CAD model. The stress analysis was carried out on three different crown materials - commercially pure Titanium (cp Ti), Zirconia (ZR), and Lithium Disilicate (LD) and compared their performance with that of human tooth material. The computational analysis results reveal that the pure Titanium (cp Ti) crown has shown the least deformation while the LD crown has showed the highest deformation under same loading conditions. When maximum stress is compared, Titanium showed the highest value, followed by Zirconia, whereas Lithium Disilicate (LD) demonstrated stress and deformation levels comparable to those of natural teeth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainability (ICGTS)

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 26)

Pages:

131-137

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-Nx204D

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2025

Authors:

Nathi Ram Chauhan*, Rishika Bhadani, Stuti Bansal, Suruchi Maurya, Aashika Aashika, Ravinder Kumar

Keywords:

3-D Analysis, Ansys Software, Computational Analysis, Dental Crown, FEM, Human Tooth, Lithium Disilicate, Static Analysis, Titanium, Zirconia

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] L. W. Ripa and G. S. Leske, "Longitudinal study of the caries susceptibility of occlusal and proximal surfaces of first permanent molars," J Public Health Dent, vol. 48(1), pp.8-13, 1988.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1988.tb03154.x

Google Scholar

[2] J. W. Nicholson, "Titanium alloys for dental implants: A Review," Prosthesis, vol. 2, no. 2, Prosthesis, p.100–116, 2020.

DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis2020011

Google Scholar

[3] J. Joshi, N. Gariya, A. R. Manral, and P. Kumar, "Comparative analysis of a human tooth using different materials based on the finite element method," Materials Today: Proceedings, p.94–98, 2020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.021

Google Scholar

[4] F. Zarone, M. I. Di Mauro, P. Ausiello, G. Ruggiero, and R. Sorrentino, "Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: A narrative review," BMC Oral Health, vol. 19, no. 1, pp.1-14, 2019.

DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x

Google Scholar

[5] Ioannis K. Karoussis, Urs Brägger, Giovanni E. Salvi, Walter Bürgin, Niklaus P. Lang "Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: A 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI(R) dental implant system," Clinical Oral Implants Research ,vol.15(1), pp.8-17, 2004.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00983.x

Google Scholar

[6] Cionca, N., Hashim, D., Mombelli, A., Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading?, Periodontology, vol. 73(1), pp.241-258, 2017.

DOI: 10.1111/prd.12180

Google Scholar

[7] P. Baldissara, A. Llukacej, L. Ciocca, F. L. Valandro, and R. Scotti, "Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems," Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 104, no. 1, p.6–12, Jul. 2010.

DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8

Google Scholar

[8] A. V. Tibau, B. D. Grube, B. J. Velez, V. M. Vega, and J. Mutter, "Titanium exposure and human health," Oral Science International. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2019.

DOI: 10.1002/osi2.1001

Google Scholar

[9] J. Singh and A. Kohli, "Stress analysis of second molar tooth," Comput Aided Des Appl, vol. 10, no. 4, p.701–709, 2013.

DOI: 10.3722/cadaps.2013.701-709

Google Scholar

[10] R. Biswas and R. C. Strawn, "Tetrahedral and hexahedral mesh adaptation for CFD problems," Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 26, Issues 1–2, pp.135-151, 1998.

DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00092-5

Google Scholar

[11] C. Âudio, P. Fernandes, J. Glantz, S. A. Svensson, and A. Bergmark, "A novel sensor for bite force determinations," Dental Materials, vol. 19, No.2, pp.118-126, 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00020-9

Google Scholar

[12] P. Shelar, S. Butler, and H. Abdolvand, "On the behaviour of zirconia-based dental materials: A review," Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 124. Elsevier Ltd, Dec. 01, 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104861

Google Scholar

[13] A. Pérez-González, J. L. Iserte-Vilar, and C. González-Lluch, "Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations," Biomed Eng Online, vol. 10, pp.1-16, June 2011.

DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-10-44

Google Scholar