For Libraries For Publication Open Access Downloads About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Intelligence Sports Performance Analytics from Strava Using Big Data Platform with Multi-Layer Perceptron
p.364
Smart AI Baby Body Scanner (SABBS): A Mobile Application for Infant Height Measurement
p.380
Near Real Time Ionosphere Opening Channel Information for HF near Vertical Incidence Skywave Communication over Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur Indonesia
p.393
Multi-Object Trajectory Prediction with Crossing Detection Using Interacting Multiple Model Kalman Filter
p.403
Simulation and Performance Analysis of Manet in Post-Disaster Areas Utilizing Proactive Routing Protocol (Case Study: Palu Earthquake 2018)
p.413
Moving Zone Clustering for Device-to-Device Users Based on Binary Message Passing
p.425
Flood Risk Mapping in Katingan Regency Using Composite Mapping Analysis (CMA) Method
p.437
Study on the Quality of Land Data Utilised in Land Policy Making around the International Borders in Sebatik Island
p.452
Built-Up Land Change and Spatial Population Distribution in Madiun City
p.459

Simulation and Performance Analysis of Manet in Post-Disaster Areas Utilizing Proactive Routing Protocol (Case Study: Palu Earthquake 2018)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Indonesia, situated at the convergence of active tectonic plates and surrounded by active mountain ranges known as the Ring of Fire, enjoys advantages such as fertile land and a tropical climate. However, these benefits also pose threats when nature is not in its best state, rendering certain regions of Indonesia susceptible to natural disasters. The consequences not only entail material and human losses but also extend to the detriment of critical infrastructure, including communication networks. Communication disruptions in crucial conditions undoubtedly hinder rescue and recovery efforts. This study focuses on designing communication scenarios based on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) as a post-disaster communication solution, utilizing the NS-3 simulator with proactive routing protocols OLSR and DSDV, alongside an analysis of their performance in scenarios involving the addition of nodes. Performance metrics, including Packet Loss, Throughput, and Delay, are compared based on the TIPHON QoS standard. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of OLSR routing performance over DSDV, with the best average throughput value at 2292.57 Kbps, a delay of 76.98 ms, and a packet loss of 0.12% for a scenario involving 150 nodes. This research aims to provide an alternative solution for developing post-disaster emergency communication networks and contribute to post-disaster rescue and recovery efforts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
The 10th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST) View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 27)

Pages:

413-424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-fH3ptM

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2025

Authors:

Muchammad Husni*, Henning Titi Ciptaningtyas, Najwa Amelia Qorry 'Ain

Keywords:

Earthquake, Mobile Ad-Hoc Network, Mobility Disaster Area, Proactive Routing, Routing Protocol

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Rosyida, A., Nurmasari, R., & Suprapto. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Dampak Kejadian Bencana Hidrometeorologi dan Geologi di Indonesia dilihat dari Jumlah Korban dan Kerusakan (Studi: Data Kejadian Bencana Indonesia 2018). Jurnal Dialog Penanggulangan Bencana, 12-21.

DOI: 10.34126/jlbg.v12i1.303

Google Scholar

[2] Fauzi, M., & Mussadun. (2021). Dampak Bencana Gempa Bumi dan Tsunami di Kawasan Pesisir Lere Kota Palu. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 16-24.

DOI: 10.14710/pwk.v9i2.6534

Google Scholar

[3] Younis, Z. A. (2021). Mobile Ad Hoc Network in Disaster Area Network Scenario: A Review on Routing Protocols. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering.

DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v17i03.16039

Google Scholar

[4] Hanafi, Rachmawati, & Fatmawati, C. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Jaringan Manet Menggunakan Protokol Routing OLSR. Jurnal Listrik Telekomunikasi Elektronika, 13-19.

DOI: 10.30811/litek.v19i1.2851

Google Scholar

[5] Mirza, S., & Bakshi, S. Z. (2018). Introduction to MANET. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 17-20.

Google Scholar

[6] Obidike, G., Nwabueze, C., & Onuzulike, V. (2018). Concept And Characteristics Of Mobile Ad-Hoc Network. International Journal Of Innovative Engineering, Technology And Science, 68-76.

Google Scholar

[7] Vijayalakshmi, D., & Sweatha, M. (2018). A Survey on History and Types of Manet. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 4310-4312.

Google Scholar

[8] Hamatta, H., Zanoon, N., & Al-Tarawneh, R. (2018). Comparative Review for Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. International Journal of Ad hoc, Sensor & Ubiquitous Computing (IJASUC),13-3.

DOI: 10.5121/ijasuc.2016.7202

Google Scholar

[9] Tanenbaum, A. S., & Wetherall, D. J. (2011). Computer Network. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Google Scholar

[10] Susanto, B., Hariyanto, A., & Surateno. (2018). Performance Comparison of Proactive and Reactive Routing Protocol in Mobile Ad Hoc Network. Journal of Communications Vol. 13, 218-221.

DOI: 10.12720/jcm.13.5.218-224

Google Scholar

[11] Wheeb, A. H., & Al-Jamali, N. A. (2022). Performance Analysis of OLSR Protocol in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 106-119.

DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v16i01.26663

Google Scholar

[12] Hanafi, Rachmawati, & Fatmawati, C. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Jaringan Manet Menggunakan Protokol Routing OLSR. Jurnal Listrik Telekomunikasi Elektronika, 13-19.

DOI: 10.30811/litek.v19i1.2851

Google Scholar

[13] E. Baccelli, J.A. Cordero, and P. Jacquet, "OSPF over Multi-Hop Ad Hoc Wireless Communications", International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, vol. 2, no. 5, September 2010.

DOI: 10.5121/ijcnc.2010.2503

Google Scholar

[14] Kong, F.-s., & Cui, B.-b. (2017). Performance Evaluation of AODV, DSR and DSDV in Mobile Ad-hoc Network. ITA Annual International Conference on Information Technology and Applications. Beijing: ITM Web of Conferences.

DOI: 10.1051/itmconf/20171204007

Google Scholar

[15] Utami, P. R. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Quality Of Service Jaringan Internet Berbasis Wireless Pada Layanan Internet Service Provider (ISP) Indihome dan First Media. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Rekayasa, 125-137.

DOI: 10.35760/tr.2020.v25i2.2723

Google Scholar

[16] Aschenbruck, N., Gerhards-Padilla, E., & Martini, P. (2009). Modeling Mobility in Disaster Area Scenarios. International Journal Performance Evaluation, 773-790.

DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2009.07.009

Google Scholar

[17] Milayanti, M. D., & Sabiq, A. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Protokol Routing ZRP dan TORA Pada Komunikasi Berbasis MANET dan WMN Untuk Penanggulangan Daerah Bencana. Jurnal Transformatika, 32-43.

DOI: 10.26623/transformatika.v20i1.5184

Google Scholar

[18] G. Walunjkar and A. K. Rao, "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols in Large Size Disaster Scenario", International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), vol. 9, no. 2, pp :4200-4204, Jul 2019

DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B3389.078219

Google Scholar

[19] Segara, A. J., Wijayanto, A., Gustalika, M. A., & Ramadhani, A. D. (2022). Implementasi Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Pada Kawasan Pasca Bencana Dengan Routing Protokol DSR. Jurnal Riset Komputer STMIK Budi Darma, 834-839.

DOI: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i4.4508

Google Scholar

[20] Barnes, P. (n.d.). About NS-3. Retrieved from NS-3: nsnam.org.

Google Scholar

[21] Subektiningsih, Renaldi, & Ferdiansyah, P. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Parameter QoS Standar TIPHON Pada Jaringan Nirkabel Dalam Penerapan Metode PCQ. Jurnal EXPLORE STMIK Mataram, 57-63.

DOI: 10.35200/explore.v12i1.527

Google Scholar

[22] BNPB. (2018). Laporan Harian PUSDALOPS BNPB. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB)

DOI: 10.29313/mediator.v10i2.3007

Google Scholar

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open access content, terms of the Creative Commons licensing CC-BY are applied.
Scientific.Net is a registered trademark of Trans Tech Publications Ltd.