Comparative Analysis of Printability, Optical, and Mechanical Properties of Coated Papers: A Case Study of Magno Satin and Art Carton Paper

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study compares the printability, optical, and mechanical properties of two types of coated papers: Magno Satin (MS) and Art Carton (AC). The evaluation includes grammage, thickness, bulk, brightness, opacity, Cobb60 value, oil penetration, tensile properties, tearing strength, and printability using offset ink. Printability tests measured optical density, CIE Lab* values, hue error, and grayness with varying ink film thicknesses from 0.8 to 9.6 microns. The results indicate that MS offers higher brightness and optical density, making it ideal for vibrant, high-quality printing. MS also demonstrated lower Cobb60 value compared to AC, indicating superior water resistance. Additionally, MS exhibited higher tensile strength and stiffness, suitable for applications requiring rigidity, such as brochures. Oil penetration values for both papers were comparable, ensuring effective ink transfer. In contrast, AC showed greater tear strength, tensile energy absorption, and elongation, making it more suitable for packaging due to its robustness and flexibility. The optimal ink film thickness for both papers was around 8.0 microns, beyond which optical density improvements were minimal, and print quality declined due to over-inking. Overall, MS excels in applications requiring superior color vibrancy, detail, and water resistance, while AC is ideal for packaging with its durability and flexibility. Selecting the appropriate paper type based on specific printing requirements ensures optimal print quality and material efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 31)

Pages:

47-56

Citation:

Online since:

January 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Ozcan and D. Tutak, "The effect of paper surface-coating pigments and binders on colour gamut and printing parameters," Coloration Technology, vol. 137, no. 5, p.445–455, 2021.

DOI: 10.1111/cote.12540

Google Scholar

[2] C. Aydemir, N. Kašiković, C. Horvath, and S. Durdevic, "Effect of paper surface properties on ink color change, print gloss and light fastness resistance," Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, vol. 55, no. 1–2, p.133–139, 2021, doi:10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol. 2021.55.14.

DOI: 10.35812/cellulosechemtechnol.2021.55.14

Google Scholar

[3] F. S. Ismail et al., "Physical and Mechanical Properties of Paper Made from Beaten Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber Incorporated with Microcrystalline Cellulose," Journal of Natural Fibers, p.1–13, 2020.

DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2020.1779896

Google Scholar

[4] U. C. Paul and J. A. Heredia-Guerrero, "Paper and Cardboard Reinforcement by Impregnation with Environmentally Friendly High-Performance Polymers for Food Packaging Applications," 2021.

DOI: 10.1002/9783527820078.ch10

Google Scholar

[5] V. Jangra, P. Kumar, and . V., "Comparative study of color difference on coated and uncoated paper in digital printing," The Scientific Temper, vol. 15, no. 01, p.1755–1758, Mar. 2024.

DOI: 10.58414/scientifictemper.2024.15.1.24

Google Scholar

[6] M. Baur, K. Willi, and R. Günter, "Coated satinated paper with anti-blocking agent comprising adhesive layer on the back side.," 2020 Accessed: Sep. 30, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://data.epo.org/gpi/EP1178096A1-Coated-satinated-paper-with-anti-blocking-agent-comprising-adhesive-layer-on-the-back-side

Google Scholar

[7] S. K. Gülsoy, Z. Hürfikir, and B. Turgut, "Effects of decreasing grammage on the handsheet properties of unbeaten and beaten kraft pulps," Turkish Journal of Forestry | Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2016.

DOI: 10.18182/tjf.15900

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Wang and Y. Ai, "Research on the Influence of Digital Printing Quality," 2019.

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Shen et al., "The effect of a polymer-stabilized latex cobinder on the optical and strength properties of pigment coating layers," Polymers (Basel), vol. 13, no. 4, p.1–14, Feb. 2021.

DOI: 10.3390/polym13040568

Google Scholar

[10] B. Mesic, G.A. Martiez-Hermosilla and P. Ratto, "Effect of pressure and time on water absorption of coated paperboard based on a modified Cobb test method," Tappi J, vol. 23 No. 4, Apr. 2024.

DOI: 10.32964/tj23.4.221

Google Scholar

[11] R. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Cao, and Z. Liu, "Ink Penetration of Uncoated Inkjet Paper and Impact on Printing Quality," Bioresources, vol. 10, no. 4, p.8135–8147, 2015.

DOI: 10.15376/biores.10.4.8135-8147

Google Scholar

[12] G. S. Suryadi and Susiani, "Analisis Sifat Fisik dan Mekanik Brown Kraft Paper Sebagai Material Kemasan Ramah Lingkungan," INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, vol. 4, no. 4, p.15253–15265, 2024.

Google Scholar

[13] M. A. Hubbe, "Less-tree paper: A review," Bioresources, vol. 9, no. 1, p.1634–1763, 2014.

Google Scholar

[14] G. S. Suryadi, S. Susiani, M. Nugraha, B. A. U. Alifah, and M. Suryani, "Optical Density of Yellow Prints at Coated and Uncoated Paper," Jurnal Ilmiah Publipreneur, vol. 7, no. 2, p.9–13, 2020.

DOI: 10.46961/jip.v7i2.84

Google Scholar

[15] C. Aydemr, S. Yendoğan, and S. Ayhan Özsoy, "Effects of Ink Consumption on Print Quality on Coated Cellulose-based Paper Surfaces," Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, vol. 54, no. 2, p.89–94, 2020.

Google Scholar