Assessing the Performance of Standard Mobility Models in Cellular Networks for Drones

Article Preview

Abstract:

Several well-known Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) mobility models that make use of cellular networks will be compared in this study. The acquisition of services for ground-based User Equipment (UE) from Drone Base Stations (DBSs) is the primary focus of the examination. The four distinguishable mobility models— Random Waypoint (RWP), Straight Line (SL), Random Stop (RS), and Random Walk (RW)—are analysed and compared in this work. The UDM and UIM are two service models that are researched in this study. The primary contribution of this work is the development of a thorough method for investigating the point process of DBSs across different mobility and service models. The study compares the basic SL mobility model to more complex models that incorporate curved trajectories and finds performance disparities between the two. It also looks at the average session and received pricing of standard user equipment (UEs). The results of this study shed light on how well drone mobility models perform in cellular network settings, which can help with the development and refinement of drone-optimized cellular networks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 35)

Pages:

165-173

Citation:

Online since:

February 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Banagar and H. S. Dhillon, "3GPP-inspired stochastic geometry-based mobility model for a drone cellular network," in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (Globecom), Dec. 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9013645

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, "Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 5, p.36– 42, May 2016.

DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2016.7470933

Google Scholar

[3] M. Grossglauser and D. N. C. Tse, "Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks," IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 10, no. 4, p.477–486, Aug. 2002.

DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2002.801403

Google Scholar

[4] C. Bettstetter, G. Resta, and P. Santi, "The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 2, no. 3, p.257–269, July 2003.

DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2003.1233531

Google Scholar

[5] X. Lin, R. K. Ganti, P. J. Fleming, and J. G. Andrews, "Towards understanding the fundamentals of mobility in cellular networks," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 4, p.1686–1698, Apr. 2013.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2013.022113.120506

Google Scholar

[6] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, Y. Nam, and M. Debbah, "A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems," IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 3, p.2334–2360, 3rd Quart. 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/comst.2019.2902862

Google Scholar

[7] 3GPP, "Enhanced LTE support for aerial vehicles," 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Tech. Rep. 36.777, 01 2018, version 1.1.0. Partnership Project (3GPP), Tech. Rep. 22.829, 11 2018, version 0.0.0.

DOI: 10.17487/rfc4396

Google Scholar

[8] V. V. Chetlur and H. S. Dhillon, "Downlink coverage analysis for a finite 3-D wireless network of unmanned aerial vehicles," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 10, p.4543–4558, Oct. 2017.

DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2017.2722500

Google Scholar

[9] R. Amer, W. Saad, and N. Marchetti, "Mobility in the sky: Performance and mobility analysis for cellular-connected UAVs," IEEE Trans. Commun., to appear.

DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2020.2973629

Google Scholar

[10] C. Zhang and W. Zhang, "Spectrum sharing for drone networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 1, p.136–144, Jan. 2017.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Tian, and V. C. M. Leung, "Modeling and analysis of aerial base station-assisted cellular networks in finite areas under LoS and NLoS propagation," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 10, p.6985–7000, Oct. 2018.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2018.2865344

Google Scholar

[12] M. Alzenad and H. Yanikomeroglu, "Coverage and rate analysis for unmanned aerial vehicle base stations with LoS/NLoS propagation," in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (Globecom) Workshops, Dec. 2018.

DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2018.8644511

Google Scholar

[13] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, "Unmanned aerial vehicle with underlaid device-to-device communications: Performance and tradeoffs," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 6, p.3949– 3963, June 2016.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2016.2531652

Google Scholar

[14] A. M. Hayajneh, S. A. R. Zaidi, D. C. McLernon, M. Di Renzo, and M. Ghogho, "Performance analysis of UAV enabled disaster recovery networks: A stochastic geometric framework based on cluster processes," IEEE Access, vol. 6, p.26215– 26230, June 2018.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2835638

Google Scholar

[15] M. M. Azari, F. Rosas, and S. Pollin, "Cellular connectivity for UAVs: Network modeling, performance analysis, and design guidelines," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 7, p.3366–3381, July 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2019.2910112

Google Scholar

[16] M. Afshang and H. S. Dhillon, "Fundamentals of modeling finite wireless networks using binomial point process," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 5, p.3355–3370, May 2017.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2017.2681659

Google Scholar

[17] A. Al-Hourani, S. Kandeepan, and S. Lardner, "Optimal LAP altitude for maximum coverage," IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 3, no. 6, p.569

DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2014.2342736

Google Scholar

[21] H. Tabassum, M. Salehi, and E. Hossain, "Fundamentals of mobilityaware performance characterization of cellular networks: A tutorial," IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 3, p.2288–2308, 3rd Quart. 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/comst.2019.2907195

Google Scholar

[22] M. J. Neely and E. Modiano, "Capacity and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 6, p.1917– 1937, June 2005. [23] Z. Kong and E. M. Yeh, "On the latency for information dissemination in mobile wireless networks," in Proc. 9th ACM Int. Symp. Mobile Ad Hoc Netw. Comput., May 2008, p.139–148.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2005.847717

Google Scholar

[24] P. Madadi, F. Baccelli, and G. de Veciana, "Shared rate process for mobile users in Poisson networks and applications," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 64, no. 3, p.2121– 2141, Mar. 2018.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2017.2781909

Google Scholar

[25] M. McGuire, "Stationary distributions of random walk mobility models for wireless ad hoc networks," in Proc. 6th ACM Int. Symp. Mobile Ad Hoc Netw. Comput. ACM, 2005, p.90–98.

DOI: 10.1145/1062689.1062702

Google Scholar

[26] R. Groenevelt, E. Altman, and P. Nain, "Relaying in mobile ad hoc networks: The Brownian motion mobility model," Wireless Netw., vol. 12, no. 5, p.561–571, Sep. 2006.

DOI: 10.1007/s11276-006-6535-0

Google Scholar

[27] I. Rhee et al., "On the Levy-walk nature of human mobility," IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 19, no. 3, p.630–643, June 2011.

Google Scholar

[28] D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Springer US, 1996, p.153–181.

Google Scholar

[29] C. Bettstetter, H. Hartenstein, and X. Perez-Costa, "Stochastic properties of the random waypoint mobility model," Wireless Netw., vol. 10, no. 5, p.555–567, Sep. 2004.

DOI: 10.1023/b:wine.0000036458.88990.e5

Google Scholar

[30] E. Hyytia, P. Lassila, and J. Virtamo, "Spatial node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model with applications," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 5, no. 6, p.680– 694, June 2006.

DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2006.86

Google Scholar

[31] S. Enayati, H. Saeedi, H. Pishro-Nik, and H. Yanikomeroglu, "Moving aerial base station networks: A stochastic geometry analysis and design perspective," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 6, p.2977– 2988, June 2019.

DOI: 10.1109/twc.2019.2907849

Google Scholar