Application of Aluminum Foam Based Vibration Dampers in Electric Car Batteries to Improve Performance and Safety

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using Vibration Damper Foam (VDF) as a vibration damping component in electric car batteries. The need for vehicles that are lightweight but resistant to vibrations due to poor road conditions is increasingly important, given the potential damage to battery cells that can cause failures, such as explosions or fires. The relevance of this research is increasing along with the global growth of electric vehicles, including in Indonesia. The research method involves numerical simulations with variations in the thickness of the aluminum foam sandwich, namely 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm. Data from the simulations were then validated through vibration tests in the laboratory to compare their agreement with experimental data. Initial simulations were performed without using aluminum foam to determine the baseline values, and then compared with simulations using foam. The results showed that without aluminum foam, the acceleration reached 8409.86 m/s2, displacement 0.0122 m, and velocity 10.36 m/s. Meanwhile, with the use of 20 mm aluminum foam, the acceleration, displacement, and velocity were reduced to 1739.96 m/s2, 0.0041 m, and 3.00 m/s, respectively. The conclusion of this study is that the addition of sandwich aluminum foam significantly reduces vibration in electric car batteries, thereby improving the safety and reliability of electric vehicles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Engineering Headway (Volume 39)

Pages:

45-55

Citation:

Online since:

July 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Choi, Y.; Jung, D.; Ham, K.; Bae, S. A study on the accelerated vibration endurance tests for battery fixing bracket in electrically driven vehicles. Procedia Eng. 2011, 10, 851–856.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.140

Google Scholar

[2] Brand MJ, Schuster SF, Bach T, et al. Effects of vibrations and shocks on lithium-ion cells. J Power Sourc 2015; 288: 62–69.

Google Scholar

[3] Opiela, K.C.; Zielinski, T.G.; Dvorak, T.; Kudela, S., Jr. Perforated closed-cell aluminium foam for acoustic absorption. Appl. Acoust. 2021, 174, 107706.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107706

Google Scholar

[4] Lu, T.; Hess, A.; Ashby, M. Sound absorption in metallic foams. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 7528–7539.

DOI: 10.1063/1.370550

Google Scholar

[5] Navacerrada, M.A.; Fernandez, P.; Diaz, C.; Pedrero, A. Thermal and acoustic properties of aluminium foams manufactured by the infiltration process. Appl. Acoust. 2013, 74, 496–501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.10.006

Google Scholar

[6] Ye, H.; Ma, M.; Ni, Q. An experimental study on mid-high temperature effective thermal conductivity of the closed-cell aluminum foam. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 77, 127–133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.029

Google Scholar

[7] Grilec, K.; Mari´c, G.; Miloš, K. Aluminium Foams in the Design of Transport Means. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2012, 24, 295–304.

DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v24i4.437

Google Scholar

[8] Dineshkumar, J.; Jesudas, T.; Elayaraja, R. Characteristics, applications and processing of aluminium foams— A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 1773–1776.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.176

Google Scholar

[9] Hassanpour Roudbeneh, F.; Liaghat, G.; Sabouri, H.; Hadavinia, H. High-velocity impact loading in honeycomb sandwich panels reinforced with polymer foam: A numerical approach study. Iran. Polym. J. 2020, 29, 707–721.

DOI: 10.1007/s13726-020-00833-5

Google Scholar

[10] Langdon, G.; Von Klemperer, C.; Rowland, B.; Nurick, G. The response of sandwich structures with composite face sheets and polymer foam cores to air-blast loading: Preliminary experiments. Eng. Struct. 2012, 36, 104– 112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.023

Google Scholar

[11] Nasirzadeh, R.; Sabet, A.R. Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2014, 63, 129–139.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.08.009

Google Scholar

[12] Zhou, J.; Guan, Z.; Cantwell, W. The impact response of graded foam sandwich structures. Compos. Struct. 2013, 97, 370–377.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.037

Google Scholar

[13] Tarlochan, F.; Ramesh, S.; Harpreet, S. Advanced composite sandwich structure design for energy absorption applications: Blast protection and crashworthiness. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 2198–2208.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.025

Google Scholar

[14] Arora, H.; Hooper, P.; Dear, J. The effects of air and underwater blast on composite sandwich panels and tubular laminate structures. Exp. Mech. 2012, 52, 59–81.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-011-9506-z

Google Scholar

[15] Jahuddin, Muh. Ma'ruf. (2023). Aplikasi Penambahan Aluminium Foam pada Struktur Crash Box Rangka Mobil Listrik. Universitas Hasanuddin: Gowa.

Google Scholar

[16] Smith, K., Gasper, P., Colclasure, A. M., Shimonishi, Y., & Yoshida, S. (2021). Lithium-Ion Battery Life Model with Electrode Cracking and Early-Life Break-in Processes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 168(10), 100530.

DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac2ebd

Google Scholar

[17] Cortada Torbellino, M., Garcia Elvira, D., El Aroudi, A., & Valderrama-Blavi, H. (2023). Review of Lithium- Ion Battery Internal Changes Due to Mechanical Loading. Batteries, 10(7), 258.

DOI: 10.3390/batteries10070258

Google Scholar

[18] Fire Safety Research Institute. (2023). The Science of Fire and Explosion Hazards from Lithium-Ion Batteries. UL Research Institutes, United States.

Google Scholar