Electromyography Feature Analysis to Recognize the Hand Motion in a Prosthetic Hand Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

The increasing need for prosthetic hands for people with disabilities is one reason for innovation in the field of prosthetic hands to create the best prosthetic hand technology. In the design of EMG-based prosthetic hands, this is determined by several things, among others, the selection of features. The selection of the right features will determine the accuracy of the prosthetic hand Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analysis the time domain feature to obtain the best feature in classifying the hand motion. The contribution of this work is able to detect 4 movements in real time, namely hand close, flexion, extension, and relax. The Electromyograph signal is tapped using an electromyograph (EMG) dry electrode sensor in which there is a circuit of EMG instrumentation amplifier. Furthermore, the analog EMG signal data is processed through the ADC (Analog to Digital Converter) by using MCP3008 device. EMG signal data is processed in Raspberry Pi. A feature extraction process is applied to reduce data and determine the characteristics of each hand movement. Feature extraction used is MAV (mean absolute value), SSI (sign slope integral), VAR (variance), and RMS (root mean square). From the results of the four-time domain feature, then the best feature extraction is determined using scatter plot and Euclidean distance. The results that have been carried out on ten people with each person doing ten sets of movements (hand close, flexion, extension, relax), showing the best Euclidean distance results, is the RMS feature, with a value of 2608.07. This data is the result of the best feature extraction analysis through the method of calculating the distance of feature extraction data using Euclidean distance. This analysis of time domain feature is expected to be useful for further experiment in machine learning implementation so that it can be obtained an effective prosthetic hand.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Supas, Profil Penduduk Hasil Supas. (2015).

Google Scholar

[2] P. Ponpriya and E. Priya, Design and control of prosthetic hand using myoelectric signal,, Proc. 2017 2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Technol. ICCCT 2017, p.383–387, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/iccct2.2017.7972314

Google Scholar

[3] M. D. M. Atique and S. E. Rabbani, A cost-effective myoelectric prosthetic hand,, J. Prosthetics Orthot., vol. 30, no. 4, p.231–235, (2018).

DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000211

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Bandou, O. Fukuda, H. Okumura, K. Arai, and N. Bu, Development of a prosthetic hand control system Based on general object recognition analysis of recognition accuracy during approach phase,, ICIIBMS 2017 - 2nd Int. Conf. Intell. Informatics Biomed. Sci., vol. 2018–Janua, p.110–114, (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/iciibms.2017.8279703

Google Scholar

[5] R. Ahmed, Prosthetic Arm Control Using Electromyography ( EMG ) Signal,, 2018 Int. Conf. Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng., p.1–4, (2018).

Google Scholar

[6] R. E. Russo et al., Algorithm of Myoelectric Signals Processing for the Control of Prosthetic Robotic Hands,, J. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol. 18, no. 1, p.28–34, (2018).

Google Scholar

[7] A. V. Vidyapeetham, EMG Controlled Low Cost Prosthetic Arm,, IEEE Distrib. Comput. VLSI, Electr. Circuits Robot., p.169–172, (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] A. H. Al-Timemy, R. N. Khushaba, G. Bugmann, and J. Escudero, Improving the Performance Against Force Variation of EMG Controlled Multifunctional Upper-Limb Prostheses for Transradial Amputees,, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 24, no. 6, p.650–661, Jun. (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2015.2445634

Google Scholar

[9] K. Xu, W. Guo, L. Hua, X. Sheng, and X. Zhu, A Prosthetic Arm Based on EMG Pattern Recognition,, IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Biomimetics, p.1179–1184, (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/robio.2016.7866485

Google Scholar

[10] A. Phinyomark and E. Scheme, A feature extraction issue for myoelectric control based on wearable EMG sensors,, 2018 IEEE Sensors Appl. Symp. SAS 2018 - Proc., vol. 2018–Janua, p.1–6, (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/sas.2018.8336753

Google Scholar

[11] A. Bhattacharya, A. Sarkar, and P. Basak, Time domain multi-feature extraction and classification of human hand movements using surface EMG,, 2017 4th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. ICACCS 2017, p.1–5, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/icaccs.2017.8014594

Google Scholar

[12] V. Kumar, A new proposal for time domain features of EMG signal on individual basis over conventional space,, 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Signal Process. Comput. Control. ISPCC 2017, vol. 2017–Janua, p.531–535, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/ispcc.2017.8269736

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Paul, V. Goyal, and R. A. Jaswal, Comparative analysis between SVM & KNN classifier for EMG signal classification on elementary time domain features,, 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Signal Process. Comput. Control. ISPCC 2017, vol. 2017–Janua, p.169–175, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/ispcc.2017.8269670

Google Scholar

[14] A. A. Neacsu, G. Cioroiu, A. Radoi, and C. Burileanu, Automatic EMG-based hand gesture recognition system using time-domain descriptors and fully-connected neural networks,, 2019 42nd Int. Conf. Telecommun. Signal Process. TSP 2019, p.232–235, (2019).

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2019.8768831

Google Scholar

[15] O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and A. E. Protocol, Quantitative Relationship Between Feature Extraction of sEMG and Upper Limb Elbow Joint Angle.,.

DOI: 10.1109/isemantic.2016.7873808

Google Scholar

[16] I. Rahayuningsih, A. D. Wibawa, and E. Pramunanto, Klasifikasi Bahasa Isyarat Indonesia Berbasis Sinyal EMG Menggunakan Fitur Time Domain (MAV, RMS, VAR, SSI),, J. Tek. ITS, vol. 7, no. 1, (2018).

DOI: 10.12962/j23373539.v7i1.29967

Google Scholar

[17] E. J. Rechy-ramirez and H. Hu, Stages for Developing Control Systems using EMG and EEG Signals : A survey,, p.33, (2011).

Google Scholar

[18] Pbarrett.net, Euclidean Distance. (2005).

Google Scholar

[19] J. Javed, H. Yasin, and S. F. Ali, Human movement recognition using euclidean distance: A tricky approach,, Proc. - 2010 3rd Int. Congr. Image Signal Process. CISP 2010, vol. 1, p.317–321, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/cisp.2010.5648214

Google Scholar

[20] M. Yochum, T. Bakir, S. Binczak, and R. Lepers, Multi axis representation and Euclidean distance of muscle fatigue indexes during evoked contractions,, IEEE TENSYMP 2014 - 2014 IEEE Reg. 10 Symp., p.446–449, (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/tenconspring.2014.6863074

Google Scholar

[21] A. Bajpai, U. Varshney, and D. Dubey, Performance Enhancement of Automatic Speech Recognition System using Euclidean Distance Comparison and Artificial Neural Network,, Proc. - 2018 3rd Int. Conf. Internet Things Smart Innov. Usages, IoT-SIU 2018, p.1–5, (2018).

DOI: 10.1109/iot-siu.2018.8519839

Google Scholar

[22] T. Triwiyanto, O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and H. Herianto, Quantitative relationship between feature extraction of sEMG and upper limb elbow joint angle,, in Proceedings - 2016 International Seminar on Application of Technology for Information and Communication, ISEMANTIC 2016, (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/isemantic.2016.7873808

Google Scholar

[23] T. Triwiyanto, O. Wahyunggoro, H. A. Nugroho, and H. Herianto, DWT Analysis of sEMG for Muscle Fatigue Assessment of Dynamic Motion Flexion-Extension of Elbow Joint,, in 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), 2016, p.1–6.

DOI: 10.1109/iciteed.2016.7863300

Google Scholar