Markov Chain Analysis of Accident Data: The Case of an Oil and Gas Firm in the Niger Delta Area of Nigeria

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concerned that management of job-oriented accidents has remained a daunting challenge for all stakeholders in Nigeria oil-industry, a longitudinal study was made to appraise the patterning of episodic incidence of industrial accidents in a typical oil and gas company operating in the Nigeria flank of the oil-rich Niger Delta Basin. A 10-year historical accident data were characterized and found to have absorbing chain properties. Four open-and-shot transition states namely : fatality, accident, near-miss and unsafe act, that are subject to ergodicity, were identified and used to craft a value digraph which define the stable transition probability matrix. The results, which suggest that on the average, 59% of staff are wasted through fatality or severe accidents, also points to escalating rates of fatalities and disabilities stemming from accidents thus calling for the need to review the existing hazard operations studies (HAZOPS) and hazard identification schemes (HAZIDS) so as to assist in whittling down, as low as reasonably practicable, the perceived unpleasant trend. The author is of the opinion that industrial accident victims, unlike in road traffic accident (RTA), habituate several times before entering the absorbing state.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

29-38

Citation:

Online since:

February 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. M. Tam and I.W.H. Fung: Effectiveness of Safety Management Strategies on Safety Performance in Hong Kong. Journal of construction Management and Economics, vol. 16, No. 1, (1998), PP. 49-55(7). Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group.

DOI: 10.1080/014461998372583

Google Scholar

[2] A. Ghaffer, A. Hyder, M. Mastoor, and I Sheikh: Injuries in Pakistan: Directions for future health policy. Journal of health policy and planning, vol. 14, No. 1, (1999), pp.11-17(7). Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.1093/heapol/14.1.11

Google Scholar

[3] K. Koch and N. Salter: The Health and Safety System in the Fedral Republic of Germany. Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 30, No. 1, (1999), pp.61-71(11). Blackwell Publishing.

DOI: 10.1111/1468-2338.00109

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Inoue, Yu Hiroe, M. Nishida and S. Shirakawa: Sleep Problems in Japanese Industrial Workers. Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 54, No. 3, (2000), pp.294-295(2). Blackwell Publishing.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00684.x

Google Scholar

[5] A. Sneddon, K. Mearns and R. Flin: Situation awareness and safety in offshore drill crews. Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 8, No. 4, (2006), pp.255-267(13). Springer.

DOI: 10.1007/s10111-006-0040-1

Google Scholar

[6] C. Denis-Remis: How can insurance benefit from more effective training programmes. The case of behavioural mitigation. International Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 3, No. 1, (2006), pp.73-82(10). Inderscience.

DOI: 10.1504/ijem.2006.010283

Google Scholar

[7] M. Zhong, T. Liu, F. Geng, X. Wei, and X. Chen: The current construction status of China emergency systems against major industrial accidents. International Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 3, No. 2-3, (2006), pp.101-113(13). Inderscience.

DOI: 10.1504/ijem.2006.011162

Google Scholar

[8] A. S. Gyekye and S. Salminen: Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 34, No 11, (2004), 2324-2342.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01979.x

Google Scholar

[9] P. T. Wong and B. Weiner: When people ask 'why', questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, (1981), 650-663.

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.650

Google Scholar

[10] D.M. DeJoy: Supervisor attributions and responses for multiple workplace accidents. Journal of occupational accidents, 9, (1987), 213 - 223.

DOI: 10.1016/0376-6349(87)90013-7

Google Scholar

[11] D.M. DeJo: Toward a comprehensive human factors model of workplace accident causation. Professional safety, 35(5), (1990), 11-16.

Google Scholar

[12] B. A Turner & N.F. Pidgeon: Man-made disasters (2nd ed. ) Oxford, (1997), UK: Butterworth - Heinmann.

Google Scholar

[13] K.G. Shaver: Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of personality and social Psychology, 14, (1970a), 101 - 113.

DOI: 10.1037/h0028777

Google Scholar

[14] S. Salminen: Defensive attribution hypothesis and serious occupational accidents. Psychological Reports, 70, (1992), 1195 - 1199.

DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1992.70.3c.1195

Google Scholar

[15] A.S. Gyekye: The self-defensive Attribution Theory Revsisited: A Culture-Comparative Analysis between Finland and Ghana in the work Environment. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] A.S. Gyekye: Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence: Miners and non-miners' perspective. Journal of Safety Research, 34, (2003), 533 - 538.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.002

Google Scholar

[17] A.S. Gyekye and S. Salminen: Causal attribution of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence . Journal of applied social Psychology, 34, 11, (2004), 2324 - 2342.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01979.x

Google Scholar

[18] A.S. Gyekye and S. Salminen: Responsibility assignment in the workplace: Finnish and Ghanaian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, (2005a), 43 -48.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00433.x

Google Scholar

[19] A.S. Gyekye and S. Salminen: The self-defensive attribution hypothesis in the work environment: Co-workers' perspective. Safety Science (In press), (2005b).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.06.006

Google Scholar

[20] M. Hewstone: Societal attributions: collective beliefs and explanation of social events. In M. Hewstone (Ed. ), causal attribution. From cognitive processes to collective beliefs, (1994), pp.205-239 oxford: Blackwell.

DOI: 10.1515/9783112469989-009

Google Scholar

[21] M. J. Martinko: The nature and function of attribution theory within Organisational sciences. In M. J. Martinko (Ed. ), Attribution theory: An organizational perspective. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie press, (1995).

DOI: 10.4324/9781315137926-2

Google Scholar

[22] M. W. Morris and K. Peng: Culture and Cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67, (1994), 949 - 971.

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949

Google Scholar

[23] J.E. Nurmi: Cross-cultural differences in self serving biases: Responses to the attributional style Questionnaire by American and finish students. Journal of social Psycology, 132, 1, (1992), 69 -76.

DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1992.9924689

Google Scholar

[24] K. Peng and R.E. Nisbett: Cross-Cultural similarities and differences in the understanding of physical causality. In M. Shield (ed. ), Proceedings of conference on culture and science. Frankfort: Kentucky state university Press, (1997).

Google Scholar

[25] S. Salminen: Risk taking, attributions, and serious accidents. Helsinki, Finland: Finish Institute of Occupational Health, (1997).

Google Scholar

[26] W. Struthers, N.L. Colwill and R.P. Perry: An attributional analysis of decision making in a personnel selection interview. Journal of Applied social Psychology, 22, (1992), 801 - 818.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00925.x

Google Scholar

[27] E. Walster: Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of personality and social Psychology, 3, (1966), 73 - 79.

Google Scholar

[28] B. Weiner: Judgements of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New york: Guilford, (1995).

Google Scholar

[29] B. Weiner and K. Allred: Effects of causal attributions on personnel decisions: A social motivation perspective. Basic and applied social psychology, 20, (1998), 155 -166.

DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2002_7

Google Scholar

[30] M. Zuckerman: Attribution of success and failure revisited: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of personality, 47, (1979), 245 - 287.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x

Google Scholar

[31] P. Tucker: The impact of rest breaks upon accident risk, fatigue and performance: a review journal of work and stress, vol. 17, No. 2, (2003), pp.123-137 (15). Psychology Press, Part of the Taylor & Francis Group.

DOI: 10.1080/0267837031000155949

Google Scholar

[32] M. R Elliott, P. R. Keindorfer and R.A. Lowe: The Role of Hazardousness and Regulatory Practice in the Accidental Release of Chemicals at U.S. Industrial Facilities. Journal of Risk Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 5, (2003).

DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00366

Google Scholar

[33] H. Kwon, H. Yoon and I. Moon: Industrial Applications of Accident Causation Management System. Journal of Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 193, No. 8, (2006), p.10241037(14). Taylor and Francis Ltd.

DOI: 10.1080/00986440500352089

Google Scholar

[34] A. Amoroso and F. Bezzi: A Reactive software system to Monitor and Assess Industrial accidents. Journal of systems Analysis Modelling simulation, vol. 43, No. 5, (2003), pp.625-638(14). Taylor and Francis Ltd.

DOI: 10.1080/0232929021000015149

Google Scholar

[35] J. C. Turner: Modern Applied Mathematics: Probability, Statistics and Operational Research, English Universities Press London, 1st Ed. 1970, pp.332-361.

Google Scholar

[36] G. G. Gilbert and D. O. Koehler. Business Mathematics, pp.354-373.

Google Scholar

[37] F. Khan & T. Husain: Risk Assessment and Safety Evaluation Using Probabilistic Fault Tress Analysis. Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 7, No 7, (2001), pp.1909-1927 (19). Taylor and Francis Ltd.

DOI: 10.1080/20018091095483

Google Scholar

[38] www. osha. gov.

Google Scholar