Role of Production Part Approval Process in Continuous Quality Improvement and Customer Satisfaction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) defines generic requirements for production part approval, including production and bulk material. The objective of PPAP is to recognize all customer requirements and to prove that manufacturing process has the potential to produce product consistently meeting these requirements during actual production run. Hence it increases customer confidence in the organisation and enhance customer satisfaction, but PPAP is much more than that. By implementing PPAP, organisation gets more benefits like manufacturing process improvement and standardisation, rejection reduction, high quality product, customer acceptance and many more which contributes towards continuous quality improvement. In this case study based research, the role of PPAP in the quality improvement and customer satisfaction is presented. The PPAP was implemented in four Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and its effect on quality and customer satisfaction was monitored. The experience of the SMEs and their customer’s feedback after implementation of PPAP is presented as a result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

174-183

Citation:

Online since:

February 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Antony, M. Kumar, C. Mandu, Six sigma in small and medium sized UK manufacturing enterprises: some empirical observations. International journal of quality and reliability management. 22 (8), (2005) 860–874.

DOI: 10.1108/02656710510617265

Google Scholar

[2] J. Doshi, D. Desai, Review of continuous quality improvement methodology – enablers, exertion, benefits for SMEs. International Journal of Quality and Innovation. 2(3), (2014) 245–255.

DOI: 10.1504/ijqi.2014.066357

Google Scholar

[3] Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) - reference manual, 4th edn, (2010) 5-125.

Google Scholar

[4] Shrotri A.P., Dandekar A.R., PPAP an effective tool for vendor quality management, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(4) (2012) 1-12.

Google Scholar

[5] Krajewski, Lee, Larry Ritzman and Manoj Malthor, Operations Management. Processes and Value Chain. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2010).

Google Scholar

[6] Salomäki, Rauno, Hyödynnä SPC – Suorituskykyiset prosessit. Metalliteollisuuden Kustannus Oy, (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Doshi, S. Jani, Measurement System Analysis for Quality Improvement Using Gage RandR Study at Company Based Ahmedabad – Manufacturer of Automotive AC Air Duct. Admet ARAI. (2012) 1-7.

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Shrotri, A.R. Dandekar, PPAP an effective tool in vendor quality management. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(4), (2012) 369-372.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Belu, A. Ali, N. Khassawneh, Application of Control Plan – PPAP Tool in Automotiive Industry. Production QUAL ITY access to success, 14(136), (2013) 5-12.

Google Scholar

[10] A.P. Shrotri, A.R. Dandekar, S.B. Khandagale, Essential Requirements of PPAP. International Journal of Technological Exploration and Learning, 3(3), (2014) 502-505.

Google Scholar

[11] Desai, D. A, Cost of quality in small- and medium-sized enterprises: case of an Indian engineering company, Production Planning and Control – The Management of Operations, 16(1), (2008) 25–34.

DOI: 10.1080/09537280701773336

Google Scholar

[12] Raisinghani, M., Kaiser, J.G. and Abdulovic, T, Theoretical quality management frameworks in today's business: an automobile industry application, Proceedings of Informing Science and IT Education Conference, (2011) 471–488.

DOI: 10.28945/1473

Google Scholar

[13] Yan, B. and Makinde, O.D., Impact of continuous improvement on new product development within SMEs in the Western Cape, South Africa, African Journal of Business Management, 5(6), (2011) 2220–2229.

Google Scholar

[14] Hirsijärvi, Sirkka, Remes, Pirkko and Sajavaara, Paula, Tutki ja kirjoita. Tammi. 464 (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] R. K Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] C Voss, N Tsikriktsis, M Frohlich, Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 22(2), (2002) 195-219.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570210414329

Google Scholar

[17] J Meredith, Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management. 16(1), (1998) 441-540.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00023-0

Google Scholar

[18] Cooper DR, Schinddler PS, Business research methods. Tata McGraw-Hill. New Delhi (2005).

Google Scholar