Simulation of Two Phase Flow Dynamics in Flexible Riser Exit Geometries for Oil and Gas Applications

Abstract:

Four different riser pipe exit configurations were modelled and the flow across them analysed using STAR CCM+ CFD codes. The analysis was limited to exit configurations because of the length to diameter ratio of riser pipes and the limitations of CFD codes available. Two phase flow analysis of the flow through each of the exit configurations was attempted. The various parameters required for detailed study of the flow were computed. The maximum velocity within the pipe in a two phase flow were determined to 3.42 m/s for an 8 (eight) inch riser pipe. After thorough analysis of the two phase flow regime in each of the individual exit configurations, the third and the fourth exit configurations were seen to have flow properties that ensures easy flow within the production system as well as ensure lower computational cost. Convergence (Iterations), total pressure, static pressure, velocity and pressure drop were used as criteria matrix for selecting ideal riser exit geometry, and the third exit geometry was adjudged the ideal exit geometry of all the geometries. The flow in the third riser exit configuration was modelled as a two phase flow. From the results of the two phase flow analysis, it was concluded that the third riser configuration be used in industrial applications to ensure free flow of crude oil and gas from the oil well during oil production.

• Periodical: International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa (Volume 39)
• Pages: 1-13
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.39.1
• Online since: November 2018
• Authors: Ikpe E. Aniekan*, Owunna Ikechukwu, Satope Paul
• Keywords: Exit Geometries, Flexible Riser, Flow Dynamics, Pressure, Simulation, Velocity

References

[1] Y. Miglis, S. H. Mark and X. Qi, Reliability Based ECA Flaw Acceptance Criteria and Safety Factors of Risers and Flowlines. ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, and Arctic Engineering, Volume 5B, Trondheim, Norway, June 25th-30th. Paper No: OMAE2017-61028, (2017).

DOI: 10.1115/omae2017-61028

[2] API American Petroleum Institute, General Overview of Subsea Production Systems, First Edition. API Technical Report 17TR13, API Publishing Services, Washington, DC, (2015).

[3] J. Chen, M. Duan and T. Kai, Dynamic Response and Fatigue Damage Analysis for Drilling Riser. Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Material Science (MEMS), Atlantis Press, (2012).

DOI: 10.2991/mems.2012.99

[4] S. Laik, V. P. Sharma and R. L. Malhotra, Recent Trends in Exploration, Exploitation and Processing of Petroleum Resources. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. ISBN: 9780070077287, (2009).

[5] Gate Energy, Introduction to Risers-Subsea Engineering, 2015 Gatekeeper. Houston, Texas, 77084, USA. [online] available at https://www.gateinc.com/gatekeeper/gat2004-gkp-2015-02, (2015).

[6] A. E. Ikpe, I. B. Owunna, P. O. Ebunilo and E. E. Ikpe, Feasibility Studies on Offshore Triceratops as Future Offshore Structure Using FMEA Approach. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development 5, 6 (2016) 104-113.

[7] A. Luppi, G. Cousin, and R. O'Sullian Deepwater Hybrid Riser Systems. Offshore Technology Conference, Asia, 25-28 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Document ID: OTC-24802-MS, (2014).

[8] S. J. Liu, Y. H. Xie, J. Yang, R. E. Xie, C. Y. Zhang, H. C. Lin and Z. R, Peng, Drilling riser dynamic characteristics of marine deep water. Oil Drilling & Production Technology 31, (2009) 1-4.

[9] Y. J. Chang, G. M. Chen, Y. Y. Sun, L. B. Xu and P. Peng, Nonlinear dynamic analysis of deepwater drilling risers subjected to random loads, China Ocean Engeering 22, (2008) 683-691.

[10] Y. Bai, R. B. Charrya and M. E. McCormick, Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series Volume 3, Pipelines and Risers. Elsevier Science Limited, Oxford OX5 IGB, UK, ISBN: 0080437125, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s1571-9952(01)80012-x

[11] M. A. Gamino, FSI Methodology for Analyzing VIV on Subsea Pipeline Free Spans with Practical Boundary Conditions. Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology, University of Houston, (2013).

DOI: 10.1115/omae2013-10419

[12] N. Politis, H. Banon and C. Curran, HIPPS-Based No-Burst Design of Flowlines and Risers. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 30th April-3th May, Society of Petroleum Engineers, (2013).

DOI: 10.4043/22908-ms

[13] P. Collberg, Guideline on Design of Pipelines Systems with Over Pressure Protection System. Report No. 2010-9414, 12TB6X5-10, Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Oslo, Norway, (2010).

DOI: 10.3940/rina.mre.2010.01

[14] C.D. Adapco User guide: STAR-CCM+ Version 8.04 [online] available at http://cumoodle.coventry.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=15595, (2013).

[15] M. Sommerfeld, Numerical Methods for Dispersed Multiphase Flows. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics, 327-396. Springer International Publishing AG, ISBN: 9783319602820, (2017).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60282-0_6

[16] Q.C. Fu, Numerical Simulation of Pressure Loss in Large Size Annulus of Deeper Water Drilling Riser. Materia Science Forum 857, (2016) 590-597.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.857.590

[17] A.E. Ikpe, E. K. Orhorhoro and O. G. Ogiemudia, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation in Air Duct Channels Using STAR CCM+. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology 4, (2017) 216-220.

[18] R. Manivel, T. Babin, N. Sangeeta and V. Brathikan, Simulation of Two Phase Flows in Flexible M-shaped Jumper to Predict the Failure. Innovative Solutions in Flow Measurement and Control in Oil and Gas, August 28-30, FCRI, Palakkad, Kerela, India, (2017).

[19] A. Saieed, B. Sam, W. Pao, and F. M. Hashim, Numerical investigation of side arm gas volume fraction in two phase T-junction. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences (JMES) 10, (2016) 2311-2323.

DOI: 10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.9.0215