Prediction of Road Infrastructure Priorities in Banten Province Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Roads are the key infrastructure that is needed to support the smooth transportation to improve the condition of the community economy. Along with the passage of time and the use of the road, the road will suffer damage due to natural factors as well as other technical factors, so it takes serious handling efforts from the local government to maintain excellent road infrastructure for the community. In case of road damage handling in some areas still found problems that need to be resolved immediately, one of them is the problem of availability of budget that is not comparable to the level of damage of the road is quite a lot required a method to know the order of the road priority should be addressed immediately. To determine the prediction and priority order of road handling, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) algorithm is used with consideration of damage, traffic, and economic factors as criteria decision. The result shows that area of Serang city with the value 0.231 (23.1%) as the most priority road to be repaired.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Akbar, C.Utary, Y. Kakerissa, S. Asmal, Priorities of road network development to support national food flows in Merauke District with SWOT and AHP methods, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 343 (2019) 012185.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012185

Google Scholar

[2] L.E.P Girsang, Kajian Kriteria Penentuan Skala Prioritas Pada Proyek Penanganan Jalan Nasional (Studi Kasus Pada Satuan Kerja Pelaksana Jalan Nasional Wilayah II Provinsi Sumatera Utara), Jurnal Poli-Teknologi. 17:1 (2018) 71-80.

DOI: 10.32722/pt.v17i1.1100

Google Scholar

[3] O.M. Oraegbune, O.O. Ugwu, Delivering Sustainable Transport Infrastructure Projects (Railway) In Nigeria: Frameworks, Indicators, Method And Tools, Nigerian Journal of Technology. 39:3 (2020) 665-679.

DOI: 10.4314/njt.v39i3.4

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Alonso, M.T. Lamata, Consistency in The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A new approach, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 14:4 (2006) 445-459.

DOI: 10.1142/s0218488506004114

Google Scholar

[5] O.K. Bhatti, A.R. Hanjra, Development prioritization through analytical hierarchy process (AHP) - decision making for port selection on the one belt one road, Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies. 12:3 (2019) 121-150.

DOI: 10.1108/jcefts-04-2019-0020

Google Scholar

[6] Z.A. Bukhsh, I.S. Oslakovic, G. Klanker, N.P. Hoj, B. Imam, Y. Xenidis, Multi-criteria decision making: AHP method applied for network bridge prioritization, The Value of Structural Health Monitoring for the reliable Bridge Management, Zagreb, 2-3 March (2017).

DOI: 10.5592/co/bshm2017.3.2

Google Scholar

[7] F. Abastante, S. Corrente, S. Greco, A. Ishizaka, I.M. Lami, A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects, Expert System With Application. 127 (2019) 109-120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.036

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ahmed, P. Vedagiri, K.V.K. Rao, Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using objective based Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 10:2 (2017) 158-170.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.01.001

Google Scholar

[9] A. Arsyad, W. Hamid, Landslide susceptibility mapping along road corridors in west Sulawesi using GIS-AHP models, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 419 (2020) 012080.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/419/1/012080

Google Scholar

[10] P. Babashamsi, A. Golzadfar, N.I.M. Yusoff, H. Ceylan, N.G.M. Nor, Integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and VIKOR method in the prioritization of pavement maintenance activities, International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 9:2 (2016) 112-120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.002

Google Scholar

[11] S. Memoli, M. Calabrese, P.D. Pace, N. Pascale, S.D. Luca, The use of the analytic hierarchy process method for supporting urban road regeneration actions: The case study of Naples, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2017 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe), Milan, Italy, 6-9 June (2017).

DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2017.7977723

Google Scholar

[12] P.Z. Razi, M.I. Ali, N.I. Ramli, Overview of analytical hierarchy process decision making method for construction risk management, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 244 (2019) 012034.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/244/1/012034

Google Scholar

[13] C. Fitouri, N. Fnaiech, C. Varnier, F. Fnaiech, N. Zerhouni, A Decision-making Approach for Job Shop Scheduling with Job Depending Degradation and predictive Maintenance, IFAC-PapersOnLine. 49:12 (2016) 1490–1495.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.782

Google Scholar

[14] G. Priorov, A. Makarova, V. Chelnokov, A. Glushko, A. Matasov, Analytic hierarchy process of geoecological monitoring of the impact of road infrastructure on environmental objects, 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM. (2019) 745-752.

DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/2.1/s08.097

Google Scholar

[15] M. Getahun, Analysis on Road Safety Inspection using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method A case study in Addis Ababa city, Thesis of the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, (2017).

DOI: 10.3934/energy.2017.4.667

Google Scholar

[16] H.A. Rani, Development priority of Road Infrastructure the Aceh post tsunami in Simeulue District, International Journal of Civil Engineering. 6:3 (2017) 9-17.

Google Scholar

[17] M.C. Djemai, M. Bensaibi, K. Zellat, Seismic vulnerability assessment of bridges using analytical hierarchy process, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 615 (2019) 012106.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/615/1/012106

Google Scholar

[18] A.R. Padillo, A.J. Torija, A.F. R. Ridao, D.P. Ruiz, Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: Prioritizing road stretches, Environmental Modelling & Software. 81 (2016) 45-55.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.009

Google Scholar

[19] G. Campeol, S. Carollo, N.Masotto, Infrastructural projects and territorial development in Veneto Dolomites: Evaluation of performances through AHP, 2nd International Symposium NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES, - Strategic planning, spatial planning, economic programs, and decision support tools, through the implementation of Horizon/Europe2020, ISTH2020, Reggio Calabria (Italy), 18-20 May (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.294

Google Scholar

[20] A. Ruiz, J. Guevara, Sustainable Decision-Making in Road Development: Analysis of Road Preservation Policies, sustainability. 12:5 (2020) 1-25.

DOI: 10.3390/su12030872

Google Scholar