Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Optimization of the Batch Process in a Rectangular Passive Greenhouse Dryer

Abstract:

The prototyping of dryer design and performance by application of the trial-and-error technique in one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) testing is completely arbitrary, expensive and time consuming. Reducing product development lead-time and cost while concurrently improving customer satisfaction for a good manufacturer enhance rapid response to market demand which is a highly effective way of improving returns on investment. In this study a numerical model for the digital prototyping of the rectangular passive greenhouse dryer design and the optimization of the batch process in the solar dryer was developed. An interactive, user-friendly computer package ANSYS 14.0 was used to develop an empirical model. The package was used among others, for the response surface methodology (RSM) optimization to specify the dryer parameters that maximize the dryer mean temperature. The factorial experiments in a central composite design (CCD) revealed that only the inlet vent dimensions influence the mean temperature within the greenhouse dryer. The parametric analysis for robust design yielded the inlet vent height of 0.27m and inlet vent width of 0.45m as the optimum design variables that maximize the mean temperature of the drying air as 320.48K (47.30 °C). The numerical approach established facilitated the prototyping and optimization of the batch process in the passive greenhouse dryer.The prototyping of dryer design and performance by application of the trial-and-error technique in one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) testing is completely arbitrary, expensive and time consuming. Reducing product development lead-time and cost while concurrently improving customer satisfaction for a good manufacturer enhance rapid response to market demand which is a highly effective way of improving returns on investment. In this study a numerical model for the digital prototyping of a rectangular passive greenhouse dryer design and the optimization of the batch process in the solar dryer was developed. Multiple regression was used as the data-analytic system for the factorial experiment to develop an empirical model, predict the response variable and then test hypothesis in an interactive, user-friendly computer package ANSYS 14.0. The package was further used for the response surface methodology (RSM) optimization to specify the dryer parameters that maximize the dryer mean temperature. The factorial experiments in a central composite design (CCD) revealed that only the inlet vent dimensions influence the mean temperature within the dryer. Appraisal of the model through the coefficient of determination ( =0.99973) showed that the model can account for 99.973% variability observed in the dryer mean temperature consequently, the suitability of RSM for the analysis of the dryer variables. The parametric analysis for robust design yielded the inlet vent height of 0.27m and inlet vent width of 0.45m as the optimum design variables that maximize the mean temperature of the drying air as 320.48K (47.30°C). The numerical approach established facilitated the prototyping and optimization of the batch process in the passive dryer.

• Periodical: International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa (Volume 56)
• Pages: 145-161
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.56.145
• Online since: October 2021
• Authors: Abhulimhen Solomon Okouzi*, Akii Okonigbon Akaehomen Ibhadode, Albert Imuetinyan Obanor
• Keywords: ANSYS 14.0 Design Exploration, Design of Experiment, Greenhouse Dryer Simulation Modelling, Optimization, Prototyping, Response Surface Methodology

References

[1] A.S. Okouzi, Simulation and Optimization of the Batch Process in a Rectangular Passive Greenhouse Dryer, A Ph.D. Thesis in Industrial Engineering, University of Benin, Benin City, (2019).

[2] Z. Pakowski, A.S. Mujumdar, Basic process calculations and simulations in drying, Fundamental aspects, in: A.S. Mujumdar (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Drying, third ed., CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2015, pp.52-75.

DOI: 10.1201/9781420017618.ch3

[3] C. Ratti, A.S. Mujumdar, Solar drying of foods: Modelling and numerical simulation, Solar Energy. 60 (1997) 151–157.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(97)00002-9

[4] J.O. Olokor, Adaptation of Solar Tent Dryer for Fish Preservation: Implications for Forest Resources Conservation around Kainji Lake. A Ph.D. Thesis in Geography, Federal University of Technology, Minna, (2004).

[5] Z. He, X. Zhang, G. Xie, Product quality improvement through response surface methodology: A Case Study. Proceedings of International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management, (TIIM) 29-31 May, Thailand, 2013, pp. S4-120-130.

[6] A. Alaeddini, A. Murat, K. Yang, B. Ankenman, An efficient adaptive sequential methodology for expensive response surface optimization, Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 29 (2013) 799–817.

DOI: 10.1002/qre.1432

[7] D. Jain, G.N. Tiwari, Effect of greenhouse on crop drying under natural and forced convection II: Thermal modelling and experimental validation, Energy Conversion and Management. 45(17) (2004) 2777–2793.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2003.12.011

[8] J.K. Afriyie, H. Rajakaruna, M.A.A. Nazha, F.K. Forson, Simulation and optimization of the ventilation in a chimney-dependent solar crop dryer, Solar Energy. 85 (2011) 1560-1573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.04.019

[9] J.K. Afriyie, M.A.A. Nazha, H. Rajakaruna, F.K. Forson, Experimental investigations of a chimney-dependent solar crop dryer, Renewable Energy. 34(1) (2009) 217–222.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.010

[10] O. Prakash, A. Kumar, ANFIS modelling of natural convection greenhouse drying system for jaggery, International Journal of Sustainable Energy. (2012) 1-20.

DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2012.724070

[11] I.K. Yeboah, Application of MATLAB-based solar dryer for cocoa drying, Recent Researches in Applied Computers and Computational Science. ACACOS' 12 Proceedings of the 11th World Scientific Engineering Academy Society (WSEAS), International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computation Science, (2012) 252-258.

[12] C.B. Maia, A.G. Ferreira, L. Cabezas-Gómez, S.M. Hanriot, T.O. Martins, Simulation of the airflow inside a hybrid dryer, International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies (IJRRAS). 10(3) (2012) 382-389.

[13] M. Manoj, A. Manivannan, Simulation of solar dryer utilizing green house effect for cocoa bean drying, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology IJAET. IV(II) (2013) 24-27.

[14] S. Lokeswaran, M. Eswaramoorthy, An experimental analysis of a solar greenhouse: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation, Energy Sources: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 35(21) (2013) 2062-2071.

DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2010.532195

[15] O. Prakash, A. Kumar, Application of artificial neural network for the prediction of jaggery mass during drying inside the natural convection greenhouse dryer, International Journal of Ambient Energy. 35(4) (2013) 186-192.

DOI: 10.1080/01430750.2013.793455

[16] R. Kumar, V. Gupta, R. Varshney, Numerical simulation of solar greenhouse dryer using computational fluid dynamics, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI). IV(VI) (2017) 111-115.

[17] T.K. Sahu, V. Gupta, Experimental analysis of open, simple and modified greenhouse dryers for drying potato flakes under forced convection, Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application. 6(7) ( Part -4) (2016) 56-60.

[18] A.S. Okouzi, A.O.A. Ibhadode, A.I. Obanor, J.O. Eze, Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the batch process in a rectangular passive greenhouse dryer, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology. 9(4) (2020) 95-107.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.56.145

[19] K.T. Ulrich, S.D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, sixth ed., Irwin/McGraw Hill, New York, (2015).

[20] C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Vol. 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, New York, (2007).

[21] H. Bullinger, R. Breining, M. Braun, Virtual reality for industrial engineering, applications for immersive virtual environments, in: G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering, Technology and Operations Management, third ed., John Wiley, New York, 2001, pp.2496-2520.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470172339.ch96

[22] H. Bullinger, J. Warschat, J. Leyh, T. Cebulla, Planning and integration of product development, in: G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering, Technology and Operations Management, third ed., John Wiley, New York, 2001, pp.1283-1295.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470172339.ch48

[23] F.L. Krause, K. Mertins, A. Edler, P. Heisig, I. Hoffmann, M. Helmke, Computer integrated technologies and knowledge management, in: G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering, Technology and Operations Management, third ed., John Wiley, New York, 2001b, pp.177-226.

DOI: 10.1002/9780470172339.ch6

[24] A.C. Endres, Quality in research and development, in: J.M. Juran, A.B. Godfrey, R.E. Hoogstoel, E.G. Schilling (Eds.), Juran's Quality Handbook, fifth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York. (1999).

[25] Electronic Industries Alliance, EIA Standard Processes for Engineering a System. Government Electronics and Information Technology Association Engineering Department. ANSI/EIA-632-(1998).

[26] K. Ogata, System Dynamics, fourth ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2004).

[27] G. Van Straten, What can systems and control theory do for Agricultural Science, AUTOMATIKA: Časopis za automatiku, mjerenje, elektroniku, računarstvo i komunikacije. 49 (2008) 105-117.

[28] S. Rajasekar, N. Meyyappan, D.G. Rao, A review on computation fluid dynamics studies in drying processes, Journal of Food Science Research, JOFSR. 1(1) (2016) 27-31.

[29] K. Pragati, H.K. Sharma, Concept of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and its applications in food processing equipment design, Journal of Food Process Technology. 3(138) (2012) 7p.

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000138

[30] B. Xia, D. Sun, Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the food industry: A review, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 34 (2002) 5–24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1699(01)00177-6

[31] D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, eighth ed., John Wiley, New York, (2013).

[32] R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, C.M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, third ed., John Wiley, New Jersey, (2009).

[33] Z. He, Y. Han, S. Zhao, S.H. Park, Product and process optimization design through design of experiments: A case study, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 20(1) (2009) 107-113.

DOI: 10.1080/14783360802614315

[34] S. Sefa-Dedeh, B. Cornelius, E. Sakyi-Dawson, E.O. Afoakwa, Application of response surface methodology for studying the quality characteristics of cowpea-fortified nixtamalized maize, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 4(1) (2003) 109–119.

DOI: 10.1016/s1466-8564(02)00070-x

[35] V.L. Anderson, R.A. Mclean, Design of experiments for industrial engineers, in: G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering, John Wiley, New York, (1982).

[36] S. Chatterjee, J.S. Simonoff, Handbook of Regression Analysis, John Wiley, New Jersey, (2013).

[37] J. Cohen, Multiple regression as a general data-analytic system, Psychological Bulletin. 70(6) (1968) 426-443.

DOI: 10.1037/h0026714

[38] J.K. Afriyie, A. Bart-Plange, Performance Investigation of a Chimney-Dependent Solar Crop Dryer for Different Inlet Areas with a Fixed Outlet Area, International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Renewable Energy. (2012) 9p.

DOI: 10.5402/2012/194359

[39] G. Palermo, C. Silvano, V. Zaccaria, E. Rigoni, C. Kavka, A. Turco, G. Mariani, Response surface modeling for design space exploration of embedded systems, in: C. Silvano (Ed.), Multi-objective Design Space Exploration of Multiprocessor SoC Architectures, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011, pp.75-92.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8837-9_4

[40] ANSYS, ANSYS 15.0 Design Exploration User's Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, (2013).

[41] J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, seventh ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2010).

[42] R.E. Walpole, R.H. Myers, S.L. Myers, K. Ye, Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, ninth ed., Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, (2012).

[43] D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, fifth ed., John Wiley, New York, (2011).