Application of a Modified Particle Swarm Optimization for Maximum Power Point Tracking for Solar Photovoltaic Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The maximum power point extraction at any instant of time on photovoltaic (PV) systems has attracted attention. This study introduces a novel DC-DC converter-based power point tracking (PPT) algorithm for solar PV systems. The proposed optimization technique is a modified form of the standard particle swarm optimization (PSO), where the limitations of the standard PSO algorithm, like random number assignment of the acceleration factors and constant weight, are modified. The main goal of the suggested modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) algorithm is to change the particle weight within a range of values and remove the random number from the acceleration factors. As a result, some of the contributions to this work are: First, when the weight is within some interval values, velocity restriction with a constant number improves. It offers the chance to expedite the search without limitation because of the constantly shifting environmental conditions. Second, the solution shows that the lack of acceleration constants predicts the particle's behavior. Thirdly, the algorithm's input parameters are incredibly minimal. The MATLAB/Simulink simulation of a modeled standalone 2.9 kW solar PV system in shading and non-shading conditions proved the proposed algorithm's performance. Thus, the average efficiency and time tracking of the global maximum power point (GMPP) is 99.45% and 6.285 s, respectively. Generally, the proposed MPPT method is more straightforward and adaptable than perturb and observe (P&O), the cuckoo search algorithm, and standard PSO.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

111-127

Citation:

Online since:

September 2023

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2023 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. Gedefaye and S. Lakeou, Simulation development of multi-axis PV system tracker, 2019 IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Renew. Energy Power Eng.,(2019) 38–42.

DOI: 10.1109/repe48501.2019.9025109

Google Scholar

[2] E. Gedefaye, S. Lakeou, T. Tadiwose, and T. Terefe, Application of system-based solar photovoltaic microgrid for residential real estate, JERA, 64 (2023) 117–32.

DOI: 10.4028/p-zj5ao9

Google Scholar

[3] A. Ul-Haq, et al., "Intelligent control schemes for maximum power extraction from photovoltaic arrays under faults." Energies 16.2 (2023) 974.

DOI: 10.3390/en16020974

Google Scholar

[4] I. Shams, S. Member, S. Mekhilef, S. Member, and K. S. Tey, "Maximum power point tracking using modified Butterfly Optimization algorithm for partial shading, uniform shading, and fast varying load conditions, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 36.5 (2020) 5569–5581.

DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2020.3029607

Google Scholar

[5] C. Manickam, G. P. Raman, G. R. Raman, S. I. Ganesan, and N. Chilakapati, Fireworks enriched P&O algorithm for GMPPT and detection of partial shading in PV systems, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 32.6 (2016) 4432–4443.

DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2016.2604279

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lasheen and M. Abdel-Salam, Maximum power point tracking using Hill Climbing and ANFIS techniques for PV applications: A review and a novel hybrid approach, Energy Convers. Manag. 171 (2018) 1002–1019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.003

Google Scholar

[7] T. T. Yetayew, T. R. Jyothsna, and G. Kusuma, Evaluation of incremental conductance and firefly algorithm for PV MPPT application under partial shade condition, In 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPES) (2016) 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/icpes.2016.7584089

Google Scholar

[8] A. Mohapatra, B. Nayak, P. Das, and K. B. Mohanty, A review on MPPT techniques of PV system under partial shading condition, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80 (2017) 854–867.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.083

Google Scholar

[9] N. Kumar, B. Singh, J. Wang, and B. K. Panigrahi, A Framework of L-HC and AM-MKF for accurate harmonic supportive control schemes, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 67.12 (2020) 5246-5256.

DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2020.2996775

Google Scholar

[10] M. S. Wasim, M. Amjad, S. Habib, M. A. Abbasi, A. R. Bhatti, and S. M. Muyeen, A critical review and performance comparisons of swarm-based optimization algorithms in maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions, Energy Reports, 8 (2022) 4871–4898.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.175

Google Scholar

[11] K. S. Tey, S. Mekhilef, S. Member, and M. Seyedmahmoudian, Improved differential evolution-based MPPT algorithm using SEPIC for PV systems under partial shading conditions and load variation, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14.10 (2018) 4322-4333.

DOI: 10.1109/tii.2018.2793210

Google Scholar

[12] S.Bhim, N.Kumar, and B. Ketan Panigrahi. "Steepest descent Laplacian regression based neural network approach for optimal operation of grid supportive solar PV generation." IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs 68.6 (2020) 1947-1951.

DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2020.2967106

Google Scholar

[13] M. M. Farag et al., "An optimized fractional nonlinear synergic controller for maximum power point tracking of the photovoltaic array under abrupt irradiance change," in IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 13.2 (2023) 305–314.

DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2023.3236808

Google Scholar

[14] D. Sadeq Al-Majidi, F. Maysam Abbod, S. Hamed Al-Raweshidy, A novel maximum power point tracking technique based on fuzzy logic for photovoltaic systems, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43.31 (2018) 14158-14171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.002

Google Scholar

[15] C. Gonzalez-Castano, C. Restrepo, S. Kouro, and J. Rodriguez, MPPT Algorithm Based on Artificial Bee Colony for PV System, IEEE Access, 9(2021) 43121–43133.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3066281

Google Scholar

[16] K. A. Amalo, S. I. Birninkudu, B. B. Bukata, A. T. Salawudeen, and A. A. Ahmad, Cultured bat algorithm for optimized MPPT tracking under different shading conditions, in 2020 International Conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science (ICMCECS), (2020) 1–8.

DOI: 10.1109/icmcecs47690.2020.246985

Google Scholar

[17] D. Fares, M. Fathi, I. Shams, and S. Mekhilef, A novel global MPPT technique based on squirrel search algorithm for PV module under partial shading conditions, Energy Convers. Manag., 230 (2021)113773.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113773

Google Scholar

[18] Hadji, Slimane, Jean-Paul Gaubert, and Fateh Krim. Real-time genetic algorithms-based MPPT: study and comparison (theoretical and experimental) with conventional methods. Energies, 11. 2 (2018) 459.

DOI: 10.3390/en11020459

Google Scholar

[19] Farooqui, S.A., Khan, R. A., Islam, N., & Ahmed, N., Cuckoo search algorithm and artificial neural network-based MPPT: a comparative analysis. In 2021, IEEE 8th Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Engineering (UPCON), IEEE, (2021) 1-5.

DOI: 10.1109/upcon52273.2021.9667651

Google Scholar

[20] A. Feroz, M. Mansoor, Q. Ling, B. Yin, and M. Y. Javed, A Salp-Swarm Optimization based MPPT technique for harvesting maximum energy from PV systems under partial shading conditions, Energy Convers. Manag., 209 (202) 112625.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112625

Google Scholar

[21] S. Titri, C. Larbes, K. Toumi, and K. Benatchba, A new MPPT controller based on the Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions, Appl. Soft Comput. J., (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.017

Google Scholar

[22] J. Luo, H. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xu, H. Huang, and X. Zhao, A modified grasshopper optimization algorithm with application to financial stress prediction, Appl. Math. Model., 64 (2018) 654–668.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.044

Google Scholar

[23] G. Calvinho, J. Pombo, S. Mariano, and M. do Rosario Calado, Design and implementation of MPPT system based on PSO algorithm, in 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS), (2018) 733–738.

DOI: 10.1109/is.2018.8710479

Google Scholar

[24] M. Alshareef, Z. Lin, M. Ma, and W. Cao, Accelerated particle swarm optimization for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking under partial shading conditions, Energies, 12.4 (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/en12040623

Google Scholar

[25] K. Ishaque and Z. Salam, A deterministic particle swarm optimization maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic system under partial shading condition, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 60.8 (2013) 3195–3206.

DOI: 10.1109/tie.2012.2200223

Google Scholar

[26] F.B. Pelap, P.D. Dongo, and A.D. Kapim, Optimization of the characteristics of the PV cells using nonlinear electronic components, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, 16 (2016)84-92.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.05.005

Google Scholar

[27] L. Rui. and F. Shi. Control and optimization of residential photovoltaic power generation system with high efficiency isolated bidirectional DC–DC converter. IEEE Access 7 (2019) 116107-116122.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2935344

Google Scholar

[28] A. Raj, S. R. Arya, and J. Gupta, Solar PV array-based, DC-DC converter with MPPT for low power applications, Reinf. Plast., 34 (2020) 109–119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ref.2020.05.003

Google Scholar

[29] Hashim, Norazlan, Zainal Salam, Dalina Johari, and Nik Fasdi Nik Ismail. DC-DC boost converter design for fast and accurate MPPT algorithms in the stand-alone photovoltaic system. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems 9.3 (2018) 1038.

DOI: 10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i3.pp1038-1050

Google Scholar

[30] Ayop, Razman, and Chee Wei Tan. Design of boost converter based on maximum power point resistance for photovoltaic applications. Solar Energy 160 (2018) 322–335.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.016

Google Scholar

[31] Fan, Xiaochao, et al. High voltage gain DC/DC converter using coupled inductor and VM techniques. IEEE Access 8 (2020) 131975-131987.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3002902

Google Scholar

[32] H. S. Saad, M. S. M. Elksas, S. F. Saraya, and M. M. Abdelsalam, An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic cells in normal and under partial shading conditions, MEJ. Mansoura Engineering Journal 46.1 (2021) 10–20.

DOI: 10.21608/bfemu.2021.146311

Google Scholar

[33] M. Alshareef, Z. Lin, M. Ma, and W. Cao, Accelerated particle swarm optimization for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking under partial shading conditions, Energies, 12.4 (2019) 623.

DOI: 10.3390/en12040623

Google Scholar

[34] C. Gao, Z. Chen, X. Li, Z. Tian, S. Li, and Z. Wang, Multiobjective discrete particle swarm optimization for community detection in dynamic networks, EPL Europhysics Lett., 122.2 (2018) 28001.

DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/122/28001

Google Scholar

[35] S. Saravanan and N. R. Babu, Maximum power point tracking algorithms for the photovoltaic system–A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 57 (2016) 192–204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.105

Google Scholar

[36] N. H. Saad, A. A. El-Sattar, and A. E.-A. M. Mansour, Modified particle swarm optimization for photovoltaic system connected to the grid with low voltage ride through capability, Renew. Energy, 85 (2016) 181–194.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.029

Google Scholar