Influence of Annealing Temperature on Structural, Morphological, Optical and Electrical Properties of Sol-Gel SnO2 Thin Films

Article Preview

Abstract:

SnO2 thin films were prepared on glass substrates by sol-gel spin coating method using stannous chloride dihydrate and ethyl alcohol absolute as raw materials at annealing temperature 450-550 °C. The crystal phase was measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and showed tetragonal rutile structure with a preferential orientation of (110). Atomic force microscope (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images revealed the homogeneous grains distribution, and SEM images showed the obvious rectangular objects corresponding to tetragonal structure. Optical properties were observed by the transmittance in ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) region and optical energy gap, which revealed the transmittance over 75% and energy gap between 3.84 eV and 3.89 eV. Finally, I-V characteristics were tested to research electrical properties, and found the gradual non-linear property and the increase of resistance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

15-20

Citation:

Online since:

May 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sang Min Lee, Young Hee Joo, Chang-Il Kim, Influences of film thickness and annealing temperature on properties of sol–gel derived ZnO–SnO2 nanocomposite thin film, Appl. Surf. Sci. 320 (2014) 494-501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.09.099

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Xia, Precursor route to poly-crystalline SnO2 nanowires that can be used for gas sensing under ambient conditions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125(2003) 16176.

DOI: 10.1021/ja037743f

Google Scholar

[3] H. J. Snaith, C. Ducati, SnO2-based dye-sensitized hybrid solar cells exhibiting near unity ansorbed photon-to-electron conversion efficiency, Nano Letter 10 (2010) 1259.

DOI: 10.1021/nl903809r

Google Scholar

[4] W. Zhou, R. Liu, Q. Wan, Q. Zhang, A. Pan, L. Guo, B. Zou, Bound exciton and optical properties of SnO2 one-dimensional nanostructures, J. Phys. Chemistry C 113 (2009) 1719.

DOI: 10.1021/jp808422a

Google Scholar

[5] W. H. LEE, H. C. SON, P. J. REUCROFT, J. G. LEE, J. W. PARK, Effect of working pressure on the electrochemical performance of thin film SnO2 microbattery anodes deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20 (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7753(00)00382-7

Google Scholar

[6] Dominguez JE, Fu L, Pan XQ, Epitaxial nanocrystalline tin dioxide thin films grown on (0001) sapphire by femtosecond pulsed laser deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79 (2001) 614-616.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1386406

Google Scholar

[7] Sundaram KB, Bhagavat GK, X-ray and electron diffraction studies of chemically vapor-deposited tin oxide films, Thin Solid Films 78 (1981) 35-40.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(81)90415-6

Google Scholar

[8] Kim KH, Chun JS, X-ray studies of SnO2 prepared by chemical vapor deposition, Thin Solid Films 141 (1986) 287-295.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(86)90356-1

Google Scholar

[9] Z. Gu, P. Liang, X. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Le, Characteristics of Sol-Gel SnO2 Films Treated by Ammonia, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 18 (2000) 159-166.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1008769020768

Google Scholar

[10] Wei Luo, Jianfeng Deng, Qiuyun Fu, Dongxiang Zhou, Yunxiang Hu, Shuping Gong, Zhiping Zheng, Nanocrystalline SnO2film prepared by the aqueous sol–gel method and its application as sensing films of the resistance and SAW H2S sensor, Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem. 217 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.078

Google Scholar

[11] Hilal Köse, ŞeymaKaraal, AliOsmanAydin, Hatem Akbulu, Structural properties of size-controlled SnO2 nanopowders produced by sol–gel method, Mater. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 38 (2015) 404-412.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.03.028

Google Scholar

[12] S. Sujatha Lekshmy, K. Joy, SnO2 thin films doped indium prepared by the sol–gel method: structure, electrical and photoluminescence properties, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 67 (2013) 29-38.

DOI: 10.1007/s10971-013-3047-0

Google Scholar