Synthesis of Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 Nanocrystal from Iron Sand with Semi-Automatic Coprecipitator

Arifa Diana Agustin; Arum Nur Kusuma Wardani; Sari Ramadhani Meutuah; Indra Sidharta; Darminto Darminto

doi:10.4028/p-bQTX02

Paper Titles

Shape Dependence of Bending Fatigue Strength Shown by Actual Stress and Strength Design Criterion Examination
p.41

Investigation of Crack Propagation Behaviors in Thermal Barrier Coatings after Heat Treatment in Hydrogen Environments by In Situ Three-Point Bending Tests
p.53

Constitutive Modeling of Fibrous Tissues with Non-Symmetric Fiber Dispersion: Application to Extension Behavior of Leather
p.59

Study of Copper Separation from Ternary Black Powder Leaching Solution Using P204 (D2EHPA) Multistage-Extraction
p.69

Enhanced Purification of Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate Leachates via P₂₀₄: A Study on Process Efficiency
p.77

Multiferroicity in Quasi-One-Dimensional Compound Ca₃NiMnO₆
p.87

Magnetism and Electronics of Pyridinic and Pyrolic Site in Graphene: A Density Functional Theory Study
p.95

Magnetic Study of LiFe(P,Si)O₄ Probed by SQUID and µSR
p.105

Synthesis of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ Nanocrystal from Iron Sand with Semi-Automatic Coprecipitator
p.111

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 1014Synthesis of Fe3O4 and Fe2O3 Nanocrystal from Iron...

Synthesis of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ Nanocrystal from Iron Sand with Semi-Automatic Coprecipitator

Abstract:

Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals have been successfully synthesized from iron sand by the coprecipitation method using a semi-automatic coprecipitator. The composition of iron sand used was 12, 18, and 24 gram, to investigate the performance of the coprecipitator. The synthesized Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals were characterized using X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-Ray (SEM-EDX), and Vibrating Sample Magnetometer (VSM). The best phase composition of Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals is 100 wt% which has a magnetite crystal size range of 5 to 13 nm, and the mass obtained is in the range of 7.01 to 12.71 gram. The best phase composition of Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals is 99.89 wt% hematite (α – Fe₂O₃) which has a crystal size range of 23 to 26 nm, the mass obtained is in the range of 3.51 to 7.49 gram. The highest gain of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals was 67.62% and 41.58%, respectively, obtained from 18 gram iron sand composition. The morphology of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals is almost spherical. The highest magnetization was obtained from Fe₃O₄ nanocrystals with a saturation magnetization of 8.87 emu/gram. The magnetic properties of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃ nanocrystals are ferrimagnetic and weak ferrimagnetic, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

The 3rd International Conference on Magnetism and its Applications (ICMIA)

View Preview

Hydrometallurgy, Metals and Advanced Materials: Magnetic and Electronic Characteristics, Properties and Processing

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 1014)

Pages:

111-117

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/p-bQTX02

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2025

Authors:

Arifa Diana Agustin*, Arum Nur Kusuma Wardani, Sari Ramadhani Meutuah, Indra Sidharta, Darminto Darminto

Keywords:

Fe₂O₃ Nanocrystal, Fe₃O₄ Nanocrystal, Iron Sand, Semi-Automatic Coprecipitator

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Y. E. Gunanto, M. P. Izaak, E. Jobiliong, L. Cahyadi, and W. A. Adi, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1011 (2018) 012005.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1011/1/012005

Google Scholar

[2] L. S. Ganapathe, M. A. Mohamed, R. Mohamad Yunus, and D. D. Berhanuddin, Magnetochemistry. 6 (2020) 68.

DOI: 10.3390/magnetochemistry6040068

Google Scholar

[3] T. Saragi, B. Permana, M. Saputri, L. Safriani, I. Rahayu, and R. Risdiana, J. Mater. Dan Energi Indones. 7 (2018) 17.

DOI: 10.24198/jmei.v7i02.15393

Google Scholar

[4] F. Malega, I. P. T. Indrayana, and E. Suharyadi, J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis. Al-Biruni. 7 (2018) 129–138.

Google Scholar

[5] M. D. Nguyen, H.-V. Tran, S. Xu, and T. R. Lee, Appl. Sci. 11 (2021) 11301.

Google Scholar

[6] I. Nkurikiyimfura, Y. Wang, B. Safari, and E. Nshingabigwi, J. Alloys Compd. 846 (2020) 156344.

Google Scholar

[7] Sunaryono, A. Taufiq, Mashuri, S. Pratapa, M. Zainuri, Triwikantoro, Darminto, Mater. Sci. Forum. 827 (2015) 29–234.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.827.229

Google Scholar

[8] Departemen Fisika Fakultas MIPA Universitas Padjadjaran and T. Saragi, J. Ilmu Dan Inov. Fis. 2 (2018) 53–56.

DOI: 10.24198/jiif.v2i1.15438

Google Scholar

[9] A. Basith, A. Taufiq, S. Sunaryono, and D. Darminto, J. Fis. Dan Apl. 8 (2012) 120205.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Mascolo, Y. Pei, and T. Ring, Materials. 6 (2013) 5549–5567.

Google Scholar

[11] L. K. Sholihah and Jurusan Fisika Fakultas MIPA Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (2010)

DOI: 10.24089/j.sisfo.2014.03.015

Google Scholar

[12] I. Sidharta, N. H. Romadhon, R. F. Syah, R. K. Hafiyanda, Darminto, and A. Shahab, Mater. Sci. Forum. 1028 (2021) 50–55.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1028.50

Google Scholar

[13] Y. W. Myint, T. T. Moe, W. Y. Linn, A. Chang, and P. P. Win, 6 (2017).

Google Scholar

[14] D. Puryanti, J. Ilmu Fis. Univ. Andalas 12 (2020) 11–15.

Google Scholar