Microstructural Evolution and Corrosion Behavior of Selective Laser Melted 17-4 pH Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

17-4 Precipitation hardenable (PH) stainless steel (SS) is useful for applications that require a combination of high strength and corrosion resistance. However, when produced through selective laser melting (SLM), it has a distinct microstructure with significant composition and phase variations based on the process parameters and post processing heat treatment conditions. Therefore, the present study examines how process parameters, such as scanning speed and hatch distance, affect the microstructural, and corrosion characteristics of additively manufactured (AM) 17-4 PH stainless steel samples. Post-processing heat treatment resulted in a uniform and reproducible microstructure in SLM samples. Heat-treated AM samples were assessed in a 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The specimen with an energy density of 39.06 J/mm³ exhibited the lowest open circuit potential value, indicating a favorable tendency to form a passive film. The sample with 66.96 J/mm³ exhibits enhanced corrosion resistance attributed to robust protective performance facilitated by a dense network of precipitates and finer grain size. This heightened resistance is further supported by the sample's highest corrosion layer resistance and charge transfer resistance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

31-36

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yadroitsev, Igor, Yadroitsava, Ina, Du Plessis, Anton, Macdonald, Eric: Fundamentals of Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Metals ( Elsevier publication 2021)

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824090-8.00024-x

Google Scholar

[2] DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, Mukherjee T, Elmer JW, Milewski JO, Beese AM, Wilson-Heid AD, De A, Zhang W: Progress in Materials Science Vol. 92 (2018), pp.112-224

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001

Google Scholar

[3] Al Dawood M, El Mahallawi IS, Abd El Azim ME, El Koussy MR: Materials science and technology Vol. 20 (2004), pp.363-369

DOI: 10.1179/026708304225011135

Google Scholar

[4] Lashgari HR, Xue Y, Onggowarsito C, Kong C, Li S: Materials Today Communications Vol. 25 (2020), p.101535.

Google Scholar

[5] Lashgari HR, Kong C, Adabifiroozjaei E, Li S: Wear Vol. 456 (2020), p.203367.

Google Scholar

[6] Ko G, Kim W, Kwon K, Lee TK: Metals Vol. 11 (2021), p.516.

Google Scholar

[7] WU Ming, ZHAO Zhi-hao, WANG Xu: Materials and Corrosion Vol. 70 (2019), p.461−469

Google Scholar

[8] Karthik D, Swaroop S: Optics & Laser Technology Vol. 120 (2019), p.105727

Google Scholar

[9] Kong D, Dong C, Ni X, Li X: Materials Degradation Vol. 3 (2019), p.24

Google Scholar

[10] Suryawanshi J, Baskaran T, Prakash O, Arya SB, Ramamurty U: Materialia Vol. 3 (2018), pp.153-61.

Google Scholar

[11] Guennouni N, Barroux A, Grosjean C, Maisonnette D, Nivet E, Andrieu E, Poquillon D, Laffont L, Blanc C: Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 823 (2021), p.141718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141718

Google Scholar

[12] Nezhadfar PD, Shrestha R, Phan N, Shamsaei N: International Journal of Fatigue Vol. 124 (2019), pp.188-204

Google Scholar

[13] Eskandari H, Lashgari HR, Ye L, Eizadjou M, Wang H: Materials Today Communications Vol. 30 (2022), p.103075.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103075

Google Scholar

[14] Sun Y, Moroz A, Alrbaey K: Journal of materials engineering and performance Vol. 23 (2014), pp.518-526.

Google Scholar

[15] Collazo A, Figueroa R, Pérez C, Nóvoa XR: Materials Vol. 15 (2022), p.1353

Google Scholar

[16] Tiamiyu AA, Eduok U, Odeshi AG, Szpunar JA; Materials Science and Engineering Vol. 745 (2019), pp.1-9

Google Scholar