Prediction of the Frictional Behavior of Sealing Assembly for Mass Production by Surface Roughness Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Direct measurement of the friction of elastomers is challenging due to the complex mechanical behavior of the rubber and the limited accessibility of the often-cylindrical counter-surface of typical sealing systems. This study proposes an indirect approach to estimate the frictional behavior of sealing assembly by analyzing the friction of more accessible reference front surfaces. The apparent coefficient of friction between a rubber seal and an aluminum die-cast component was evaluated through surface roughness analysis, adhesion and direct friction measurements. Power spectral density functions were used to describe the counter-surface topography and to estimate friction using a simplified rubber friction model. Adhesion was characterized by contact angle measurements. The results reveal a moderate correlation between surface roughness and friction, demonstrating that indirect estimation may provide useful input for assembly analysis without destructive testing of the actual interface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-12

Citation:

Online since:

August 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] V. Sári-Barnácz and T. J. Goda, "Indirekt hiperelasztikus anyagmodell identifikáció autóipari gyártósor tömítésszerelési adatainak felhasználásával," Gép, vol. 75, no. 3–4, p.91–96, 2024.

DOI: 10.70750/GEP.2024.3-4.20

Google Scholar

[2] F. P. Bowden, D. Tabor, and G. I. Taylor, "The area of contact between stationary and moving surfaces," Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 169, no. 938, p.391–413, Jan. 1997.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1939.0005

Google Scholar

[3] A. Schallamach, "A theory of dynamic rubber friction," Wear, vol. 6, no. 5, p.375–382, Sep. 1963.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(63)90206-0

Google Scholar

[4] K. A. Grosch, "The Relation between the Friction and Visco-Elastic Properties of Rubber," Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, vol. 274, p.21–39, Jun. 1963.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1963.0112

Google Scholar

[5] J. A. Greenwood, "Constriction resistance and the real area of contact," Br. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 17, no. 12, p.1621, Dec. 1966.

DOI: 10.1088/0508-3443/17/12/310

Google Scholar

[6] V. Popov and M. Heß, Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction. 2015.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-46160-0

Google Scholar

[7] B. N. J. Persson, "Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 115, no. 8, p.3840–3861, Aug. 2001.

Google Scholar

[8] B. N. J. Persson, O. Albohr, U. Tartaglino, A. I. Volokitin, and E. Tosatti, "On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion," J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. R1–R62, Jan. 2005.

DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/17/1/R01

Google Scholar

[9] R. Heise, "Friction between a temperature dependent viscoelastic body and a rough surface," Friction, vol. 4, no. 1, p.50–64, Mar. 2016.

DOI: 10.1007/s40544-016-0103-0

Google Scholar

[10] M. Scaraggi and B. N. J. Persson, "General contact mechanics theory for randomly rough surfaces with application to rubber friction," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 143, no. 22, p.224111, Dec. 2015.

DOI: 10.1063/1.4936558

Google Scholar

[11] A. Genovese, F. Farroni, A. Papangelo, and M. Ciavarella, "A Discussion on Present Theories of Rubber Friction, with Particular Reference to Different Possible Choices of Arbitrary Roughness Cutoff Parameters," Lubricants, vol. 7, no. 10, p.85, Oct. 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/lubricants7100085

Google Scholar

[12] M. Ciavarella, "A simplified version of Persson's multiscale theory for rubber friction due to viscoelastic losses." arXiv, Feb. 02, 2017.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4036917

Google Scholar

[13] A. Tiwari, N. Miyashita, N. Espallargas, and B. N. J. Persson, "Rubber friction: The contribution from the area of real contact," J. Chem. Phys., vol. 148, no. 22, p.224701, Jun. 2018.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5037136

Google Scholar

[14] K. L. Johnson, K. Kendall, A. D. Roberts, and D. Tabor, "Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids," Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 324, no. 1558, p.301–313, Jan. 1997.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1971.0141

Google Scholar

[15] V. L. Popov, Contact Mechanics and Friction. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.

Google Scholar

[16] F. Kaiser, D. Savio, and R. Bactavatchalou, "Modelling of Static and Dynamic Elastomer Friction in Dry Conditions," Lubricants, vol. 12, no. 7, Art. no. 7, Jul. 2024.

DOI: 10.3390/lubricants12070250

Google Scholar

[17] T. D. B. Jacobs, T. Junge, and L. Pastewka, "Quantitative characterization of surface topography using spectral analysis," Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., vol. 5, no. 1, p.013001, Jan. 2017.

DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/aa51f8

Google Scholar

[18] M. C. Röttger et al., "Contact.engineering—Create, analyze and publish digital surface twins from topography measurements across many scales," Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., vol. 10, no. 3, p.035032, Sep. 2022.

DOI: 10.1088/2051-672X/ac860a

Google Scholar

[19] D. K. Owens and R. C. Wendt, "Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers," J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 13, no. 8, p.1741–1747, 1969.

DOI: 10.1002/app.1969.070130815

Google Scholar

[20] D. H. Kaelble, "Dispersion-Polar Surface Tension Properties of Organic Solids," J. Adhes., Apr. 1970.

DOI: 10.1080/0021846708544582

Google Scholar

[21] A. Tiwari, T. Tolpekina, H. van Benthem, M. K. Gunnewiek, and B. N. J. Persson, "Rubber Adhesion and Friction: Role of Surface Energy and Contamination Films," Front. Mech. Eng., vol. Volume 6-2020, 2021, Accessed: Nov. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //www.frontiersin.org/journals/mechanical-engineering/articles/.

DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2020.620233

Google Scholar