Paper Titles

Numerical Study of the Influence of Imperfection of the Tip of a Vickers Indenter on Ultramicrohardness Test Results
p.525

Forming Limit Diagram for 6016-T4 Aluminium Alloy Deformed along Linear and Complex Strain Paths
p.529

Numerical Modelling of Carbon/Epoxy Laminated Plate Impact Damage
p.533

A New Anisotropic Yield Criterion for Aluminium Alloys
p.537

Reverse Deep Drawing: Experimental and Numerical Simulation Results
p.541

In-House Development and Application of Solidification Simulation Software
p.545

Comparison of Experimental and Simulated Results for a Mild Steel and a Dual-Phase Steel Deformed under Tension and Deep-Drawing
p.549

Transparent and Antiglare Conducting Coatings Deposited by Wet Chemical Processes
p.555

Role of the Density of States in the Colour Selection of the Collection Spectrum of Amorphous Silicon-Based Schottky Photodiodes
p.559

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 230-232Reverse Deep Drawing: Experimental and Numerical...

Reverse Deep Drawing: Experimental and Numerical Simulation Results

Article Preview

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Materials Forum I

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 230-232)

Pages:

541-544

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.230-232.541

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2002

Authors:

P.Y. Manach, Marta C. Oliveira, S. Thuillier, Luis Filipe Menezes

Keywords:

Experimental Investigation, Numerical Simulation, Reverse Deep Drawing

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2002 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Makinouchi. Journal of Material Processing Technology, vol.60, pp.19-26, 1996.

[2] Numisheet’99. Eds J.C. Gelin and P. Picart, Besançon France, 1999.

[3] Numisheet’96. Eds J.K. Lee, G.L. Kinzel and R.H. Wagoner, Dearborn, Michigan USA, 1996.

[4] J. Danckert, K.B. Nielsen and P. Hojberg. Proc. of Numisheet’99 Int. Conf., pp.637-642, 1999.

[5] S. Thuillier and P.Y. Manach. Submitted to Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001.

[6] Z. Marciniak, J. Duncan. Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Publ. by Edward Arnold, 1992.

[7] S. Thuillier, L. Alves, L.P. Menezes, P.Y. Manach. Submitted to Materials Science Forum, 2001.

[8] L. Shulkin et al., J. Mat. Proc. Tech., vol.59, pp.34-40, 1996.

[9] M.A. Ahmetoglu, G.L. Kinzel, T. Altan, J. Brandelstein, MF95-122, NAMRC XXIII, 1995.

[10] S.K. Esche et al., J. Mat. Proc. Technology, vol.98, pp.17-24, 2000. Fig.5. Experimental and numerical thickness cup wall after stage 2 for 0º, 45º and 90º 0,9 0,95 1 1,05 1,1 1,15 1,2 1,25 1,3 1,35 1,4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Distance from the cup bottom (mm) Thi ck ne ss (m m) Experimental RD Experimental 90º Experimental 45º 1 - Numerical RD 2 - Numerical 90º 3 - Numerical 45º Initial Thickness 1 2 3

DOI: 10.21608/erjeng.2019.125701